Jump to a key chapter
Understanding Finitely Repeated Games
Finitely Repeated Games, a concept of central importance in Business Studies, opens avenues to understanding strategic interactions among businesses under certain conditions.Introduction to Finitely Repeated Games in Managerial Economics
Let's dive deeper into the realm of Finitely Repeated Games. Within the context of managerial economics, or even more broadly, in the fields of economics and game theory, Finitely Repeated Games refer to games where participants play a base game for a fixed known number of periods.A Finitely Repeated Game is characterised by the base game, the number of times participants repeat the base game, and the protocol that dictates the game's flow
Why Finitely Repeated Games Matter in Business Studies
The study of Finitely Repeated Games in Business Studies delivers important knowledge on strategic exchanges between diverse commercial entities. It affords useful insights into buyer-seller relationships, price wars among competitors, cooperation strategy, and ways to attain the optimal equilibrium in market scenarios.Application of Finitely Repeated Game models can accurately predict the potential outcomes and profits of strategic decisions under specific conditions, thus helping a business constantly stay ahead.
Core Concepts of Finitely Repeated Games in Game Theory
Let's move on to the key concepts associated with Finitely Repeated Games. The recurring terms that you tend to come across when studying these games include:- \(\text{Subgame perfect equilibrium}\)
- \(\text{Nash equilibrium}\)
- \(\text{Backward induction}\)
\(\text{Subgame perfect equilibrium}\) occurs in a game when players devise a strategy that secures them the maximum possible outcome, given the strategies of other players in every possible subgame.
In the first year, both entities simultaneously select a price for their product. The lower price gains a larger market share. This scenario repeats over the subsequent years. A Finitely Repeated Game model will allow these businesses to predict their competitor's pricing strategy and optimise their own strategy to maximise cumulative profit.
The Role of Strategic Interaction and Information in Finitely Repeated Games
Strategic interaction and information play influential roles in Finitely Repeated Games. On one hand, strategic interactions influence decision-making, affecting the payoff matrices and game outcomes. On the other hand, information availability or lack thereof can significantly influence a player's strategy.In game theory, the term \(\text{Perfect Information}\) refers to the scenario in which each player, at every stage of the game, is aware of every action that has taken place so far.
Exploring Finitely Repeated Games Examples
Bringing theoretical concepts to life, let's delve into some real-world and fictitious examples that effectively illustrate the principles and intricacies of Finitely Repeated Games.Practical Examples of Finitely Repeated Games
Finitely Repeated Games are evident in many day-to-day situations and more so in the world of business. To understand the practical applications of Finitely Repeated Games better, let's consider the following scenarios: 1. Market Price Wars: Imagine two large supermarket chains operating in the same city. They're in stiff competition and often strategically lower their prices to attract customers; they conduct this exercise four times a year. Here, their pricing game repeats four times in a year – a prime example of a Finitely Repeated Game. In this scenario, each supermarket chain must determine a pricing strategy considering the competitor's potential moves to ensure maximum profits.If supermarket A decides to undercut supermarket B by lowering prices, they may attract more customers and hence increase sales. However, if supermarket B chooses to lower its prices even further, supermarket A's strategy may backfire. Thus, supermarket A needs to anticipate this and choose a price not easily undercut by B while still remaining attractive to customers. This decision process highlights the strategic interaction at play in Finitely Repeated Games.
Case Study: Finitely Repeated Games in Real World Business Scenarios
Examining real-world application can vitalise the understanding of Finitely Repeated Games concepts. Let's look at a case study of the Coca-Cola and Pepsi 'Cola Wars' – a classic example of how large corporations engage in Finitely Repeated Games. For decades, these two giant beverage companies have been in a fierce rivalry, constantly attempting to outdo each other in terms of pricing, marketing, and product development efforts. Their intense competition can be modelled as a Finitely Repeated Game, where each strategic move forms a round of the game.Each year, both Coca-Cola and Pepsi dedicate huge sums to advertising campaigns, aiming to increase their market share. If Coca-Cola learns that Pepsi is planning a large campaign, they might opt to increase their own advertising budget to counteract it. However, if Pepsi anticipates this and decides to unexpectedly reduce their advertising spend, Coca-Cola might overspend unnecessarily. This strategic decision making process reprised here perfectly embodies a Finitely Repeated Game. The moves made by either player depend not only on their individual payoffs but also on what they expect the other player to do.
Delving into the Finitely Repeated Game Subgame Perfect Equilibrium
Subgame Perfect Equilibrium represents an essential concept within the context of Finitely Repeated Games, offering valuable understanding about game outcomes under strategic interaction.Breaking Down the Subgame Perfect Equilibrium in Finitely Repeated Games
In Finitely Repeated Games, the Subgame Perfect Equilibrium refers to a state in which all players devise a strategy that provides each player with the maximum possible outcome, given the strategies selected by other players. This applies in every possible subgame, regardless of the historical adaptation of strategies in the game. Understanding this definition requires insight into some fundamental terms. Firstly, let's establish what a 'subgame' signifies.A 'subgame' is defined as part of the original game that starts at some decision node and includes all subsequent nodes. It, essentially, reflects the remaining strategic interaction that follows that decision point.
The Mechanics of Subgame Perfect Equilibrium in Finitely Repeated Games
Understanding the mechanics of achieving Subgame Perfect Equilibrium in Finitely Repeated Games involves the notion of backward induction.Backward induction is a process where you solve a game starting from the end, or the last period, and working your way back to the first period.
Period 3 | Player A’s Strategy | Player B’s Strategy | Player A’s Payoff | Player B’s Payoff |
High | High | 100 | 100 | |
High | Low | 150 | 50 | |
Low | High | 50 | 150 | |
Low | Low | 125 | 125 |
Period 2 | Player A’s Strategy | Player B’s Strategy | Player A’s Payoff (current + future) | Player B’s Payoff (current + future) |
High | High | 200 + 100 = 300 | 200 + 100 = 300 | |
High | Low | 350 + 50 = 400 | 100 + 150 = 250 | |
Low | High | 100 + 150 = 250 | 350 + 50 = 400 | |
Low | Low | 250 + 125 = 375 | 250 + 125 = 375 |
Comprehending Finitely Repeated Games Backward Induction
Backward induction serves as a cornerstone analytical tool when dealing with Finitely Repeated Games. By understanding this influential concept, you impart a keen edge to your decision-making ability and strategic thinking when dealing with these games.An In-Depth Look at Backward Induction in Finitely Repeated Games
Backward induction, a strategic method of solving dynamic games, exhibits exceptional value when dealing with Finitely Repeated Games. This method could be vital while formulating robust strategies and predicting your competitor's moves, regardless of whether you're a large corporation, startup, or even a student studying Business Studies. With backward induction, you start solving the game from the end (the final period) and gradually move towards the beginning. The term 'backwards' should not confuse you. In essence, this technique allows you to "look into the future" by analysing decisions in reverse chronological order. The key steps delivered by backward induction are as follows:- Firstly, evaluate potential decisions and associated payoffs in the last round of the game.
- Secondly, move to the preceding round and, considering the outcomes from the following round, identify the optimal decisions at this stage.
- Lastly, repeat this process until the first round of the game is reached.
In game theory, a round that exhibits the optimal play considering the outcomes of all future rounds is said to be at a Subgame Perfect Equilibrium. It is critical to note that backward induction always leads to a Subgame Perfect Equilibrium in Finitely Repeated Games.
How Backward Induction Influences Decision Making in Finitely Repeated Games
Backward induction encompasses a profound impact on decision making within Finitely Repeated Games contexts. By its leveraging, you obtain the ability to predict potential strategic decisions by your competitors. This empowers you to mould your strategies to deliver the best possible outcomes and navigate the game constructively. A central aspect of decision making influenced by backward induction is the consideration of future repercussions. It is not solely about making optimal decisions for the present stage. It's about selecting actions that lead to favourable future outcomes, given the likely future reactions by your competitors.This concept is known as intertemporal decision making, a key pillar of the backward induction process. It essentially refers to how your current decisions are influenced by the potential future outcomes.
Understanding the Finitely Repeated Games Folk Theorem
The Folk Theorem, a fundamental part of the mathematical field of game theory, uncovers unique relevance when applied to Finitely Repeated Games. This theorem proposes that any feasible and individually rational payoff can be sustained as an equilibrium outcome in indefinitely repeated games. While its namesake suggests an undefined origin, don't let that fool you; the strategies and outcomes it encompasses are anything but vague.Decoding the Folk Theorem's Role in Finitely Repeated Games
The Folk Theorem deals with the equilibrium outcomes of infinitely repeated games, yet it still lends noteworthy insights into the structure of Finitely Repeated Games. To decode the role and implications of the Folk Theorem for Finitely Repeated Games, an excursion of its basis is crucial. The Folk Theorem posits that if players in a game discount the future sufficiently lightly or the horizon of the overall game extends indefinitely, then any feasible outcome that provides each player with a payoff at least as much as the minmax payoff can be sustained as a Nash equilibrium.The Minmax Payoff refers to the minimum payoff a player can assure themselves regardless of the actions of other players. The Feasible Outcome of a game is any element of the set of possible payoff combinations that players could secure for themselves if they were to play specific strategies.
The Relationship Between the Folk Theorem and Finitely Repeated Games
Fathamming out the relationship between the Folk Theorem and Finitely Repeated Games opens intriguing possibilities that broaden your understanding of strategic interactions. This relationship demonstrates how the structure and outcomes of Finitely Repeated Games can be influenced dramatically by the future's perceived importance. The Folk Theorem and Finitely Repeated Games are inherently linked by the premise of repeated strategic interaction. Nevertheless, their relationship stems from the fact that both include contexts where players repeatedly interact, typically in similar fashion, over time. The Folk Theorem, conceived for infinitely repeated games, presupposes a continuity or persistence of strategic interaction with no foreseeable end. However, Finitely Repeated Games have a distinct end, creating a terminal effect influencing the strategies of players, particularly as the game's end draws near. The contrast in these scenarios leads to the crux of the relationship between the Folk Theorem and Finitely Repeated Games. While many cooperative outcomes feasible in infinitely repeated games as per the Folk Theorem aren't usually maintainable in Finitely Repeated Games, the Folk Theorem still lays the foundation of understanding deviation and incentives for cooperation in these games. In Finitely Repeated Games, it may be possible to maintain cooperative strategies for considerable periods by relying on the threat of switching to non-cooperative strategies in case of a deviation, akin to the Folk Theorem's premise. This is usually attainable until the game nears its end, as the threat of reversion becomes insignificant. By integrating the lessons from the Folk Theorem and acknowledging the critical role of the game's finiteness, players can devise advanced nuanced strategies that balance immediate gains from potential deviations with future payoffs from sustained cooperation. In summarising, it can be concluded that while the Folk Theorem's traditional formulation does not directly apply to Finitely Repeated Games, the theorem's central lessons in maintaining cooperation and deterring deviations unfold critical guiding principles for Finitely Repeated Games, defining and enriching their relationship.Discerning the Difference Between Finitely and Infinitely Repeated Games
While both finitely and infinitely repeated games bear the premise of repeated strategic interaction, the differences in their nature and implications significantly influence the outcomes and strategies employed within these games. Recognising the dichotomy between finitely and infinitely repeated games helps comprehend the intricacies of strategic decision-making.Highlighting Key Distinctions Between Finitely and Infinitely Repeated Games
Let's focus on the characteristics that discern finitely and infinitely repeated games, which lay the groundwork for an in-depth understanding of strategic interactions in repeated games: 1. Duration of the Game: The discerning contrast between finitely and infinitely repeated games lies in their duration. Finitely repeated games have a predetermined end, known to all players, occurring after a fixed number of periods. On the contrary, infinitely repeated games extend indefinitely without a foreseeable conclusion. 2. Terminal Effect: In finitely repeated games, the imminent end of the game affects the players' behaviour and strategic choices, dubbed the 'Terminal Effect'. The closer the game gets to its end, the lesser are the repercussions of today's actions on future outcomes – affecting cooperative actions. In infinitely repeated games, lacking a foreseeable end, the terminal effect does not manifest. Players weigh current decisions considering limitless possible future interactions.Terminal Effect refers to the influence of the game's end-point on a player's strategic decisions during the course of the game.
Applying the Differences Between Finitely and Infinitely Repeated Games in Context
Understanding the differences between finitely and infinitely repeated games in the context of strategic interactions deepens insight into their potential applications and implications.Finitely Repeated Game | Infinitely Repeated Game |
A situation where a firm competes on price with another firm for a contract over a fixed duration of three years. | A situation where a firm consistently competes on price with another firm over an indefinite duration. |
As the end of the three-year period approaches, the terminal effect becomes more prominent, influencing the strategies of competing firms. The possibility of retaliation or reward in future periods diminishes. | Since there is no predictable end, the businesses can always influence future outcomes through their current actions. This enables sustaining cooperative outcomes. |
Using backward induction could enable one to predict the pricing strategies of the competing firms for each year of the three years. | Backward induction wouldn’t be of value as there is no defined end-point. However, strategy selection may still consider the likelihood of future interactions. |
Finitely Repeated Games - Key takeaways
- Finitely Repeated Games: Refers to scenarios where strategic interactions between players (businesses, individuals, etc.) occur a definite number of times. Example: The price wars between Coca-Cola and Pepsi, where each strategic decision is a 'round' of the game.
- Subgame Perfect Equilibrium: Within the context of finitely repeated games, it refers to a state where all players plan a strategy that maximises their outcomes, given the strategies chosen by others. This applies to every possible subgame - a part of the game that starts at a decision point and includes all subsequent nodes.
- Backward Induction: A method of solving Finitely Repeated Games by beginning from the last round of the game and moving backwards to the game's starting point. This approach aids in achieving Subgame Perfect Equilibrium while helping to predict potential strategies of competitors.
- Intertemporal Decision Making: The process where current decisions are influenced by potential future outcomes, a key aspect of the backward induction process in Finitely Repeated Games.
- Folk Theorem's application to Finitely Repeated Games: Despite originally dealing with infinitely repeated games, the Folk Theorem provides insights into the structure and potential outcomes of Finitely Repeated Games. While not applicable directly due to finite games' end-points, the theorem assists in understanding the possibilities of sustaining cooperative outcomes and punishing non-cooperative deviations.
Learn with 12 Finitely Repeated Games flashcards in the free StudySmarter app
We have 14,000 flashcards about Dynamic Landscapes.
Already have an account? Log in
Frequently Asked Questions about Finitely Repeated Games
About StudySmarter
StudySmarter is a globally recognized educational technology company, offering a holistic learning platform designed for students of all ages and educational levels. Our platform provides learning support for a wide range of subjects, including STEM, Social Sciences, and Languages and also helps students to successfully master various tests and exams worldwide, such as GCSE, A Level, SAT, ACT, Abitur, and more. We offer an extensive library of learning materials, including interactive flashcards, comprehensive textbook solutions, and detailed explanations. The cutting-edge technology and tools we provide help students create their own learning materials. StudySmarter’s content is not only expert-verified but also regularly updated to ensure accuracy and relevance.
Learn more