Conflict Process

Definition of Conflict Process

Often, this process begins with a latent conflict or a perceived conflict, and it eventually progresses to a noticeable or overt conflict. These stages include conflict antecedents, perceived and felt conflicts, manifest conflicts, conflict outcomes, and resolution. An important component in understanding conflict process is recognizing conflict antecedents. These involve:

• Communication factors such as differing word connotations, noise, and misinformation
• Structural factors such as size, degree of specialisation, and jurisdictional clarity
• Personal variables which include individual values and personality traits

Types of Conflict in Organisational Behaviour

In the realm of organisational behaviour, conflict takes on various forms. Each type of conflict can have a different impact on both individual members and the overall goals of an organisation, necessitating various methods of conflict resolution.

Role and Influence of Managers

Significant differences exist in the way managers respond to conflicts, thereby influencing the conflict process extensively. They can either accentuate or mitigate conflicts based on their understanding and proficiency in handling difficult situations and disagreements. Ultimately, the understanding and management of the conflict process are of immense importance in business studies, with successful conflict resolution viewed as a critical skill for effective managers. A comprehensive comprehension of this topic arms individuals with the requisite capabilities to navigate the intricate world of organizational relationships.

The Stages of the Conflict Process

The conflict process typically unfolds in five stages. These stages include potential opposition or incompatibility, cognition and personalisation, intentions, behaviour, and aftermath or outcomes.

Detailed Overview of Conflict Process Stages

The conflict process begins with the stage of Potential Opposition or Incompatibility. This stage constitutes the conditions that create opportunities for conflict to arise. They include communication barriers, structure, and personal variables. The structure includes factors like size, degree of specialisation, member-goal compatibility, leadership styles, reward systems, and the degree of dependence between parties; The next stage is Cognition and Personalisation. The potential for opposition becomes actualised into a conflict when parties involved are affected by it and acknowledge its existence. The third stage, Intentions, involve decisions by the parties to act in a given way. Intentions are usually planed responses and can range from competing, collaborating, avoiding, accommodating to compromising. This is followed by the fourth stage, Behaviour, which is where conflict becomes visible. The behaviour stage includes the statements, actions, reactions, and inactions. The final stage is the Outcomes/Aftermath stage.

How Managers can Navigate through Each Conflict Process Stage

Management's role is crucial in guiding the conflict process to ensure functional outcomes. The strategies and techniques used can vary across different stages of the conflict process. During the first stage, Potential Opposition or Incompatibility, managers should work on eliminating any potential triggers for conflict like communication gaps, structural discrepancy, and personal differences. They can do this by encouraging open communication, formulating clear roles and responsibilities and promoting understanding among team members. In the Cognition and Personalisation stage, it is crucial for managers to check misunderstandings and miscommunication immediately. This can be achieved by having personal conversations with parties involved to understand their perspective and explain the actual scenario. Next in the Intentions stage, a manager should guide the team members to formulate planned responses that are in the best interest of the overall group and work goals. It is equally important to discourage harmful intent that could escalate the conflict. The Behaviour stage is where the manager's skills are truly put to the test as this necessitate immediate and effective conflict management. Techniques vary from negotiation, mediation to promoting collaboration and understanding. Finally, in the Outcomes stage, depending on the results achieved, managers should either work on rewarding the behaviour that led to functional outcomes or rectifying the situation that resulted in dysfunctional results to avoid repeat. In conclusion, managers navigating through each of these stages need a deep understanding of people management and effective communication skills. With the right approach, conflict can lead to creative solutions, improvement of relationships and enhancement in self-knowledge and perspective.

The Conflict Process Model

The Conflict Process Model encapsulates five key stages through which a conflict evolves. These stages include potential opposition or incompatibility, cognition and personalisation, intentions, behaviour, and outcomes.

Insights into the Conflict Process Model

The Conflict Process Model is governed by the cognitive, behavioural, and emotional dynamics that contribute to the emergence, escalation, de-escalation and resolution of conflicts. Here's an in-depth walk through the five stages: The first step - Potential Opposition or Incompatibility - includes the scenarios and conditions that may instigate the conflict. These are often categorised into communication, structure, and personal variables.

• Communication deals with semantic misunderstandings, misinterpretation of information, noise in communication channels or merely the absence of communication.
• Structure pertains to the conflicts arising from organisational aspects like the size and complexity of the group, level of specialisation and interdependence, clarity of roles, leadership styles and reward systems.
• Personal Variables represent the individual characteristics and belief systems that may not align with the organisational aspirations or other individual's views.

The second stage, Cognition and Personalisation, only occurs if the conditions leading to conflict are perceived by the parties involved. The conflict really exists only when the parties are aware of it. It might negatively influence their emotions (felt conflict) or just reside as a thought process (perceived conflict) without any emotional involvement. Intentions, the third stage, manifest in the behaviour which demonstrates how the parties plan to deal with the conflict. There are five major conflict-handling intentions or behaviours namely competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating. Each one finds suitable application depending upon the situations and involved parties. In the fourth stage of Behaviour, dynamics shift from being latent to becoming overt conflict. Here, the measures taken during the intention stage get executed and are visible to others. The final stage, known as Outcomes, is the result of the conflict process. This stage can have a spectrum of results i.e., they can either be constructive resulting in improved group performance or dysfunctional leading to a decline in performance or satisfaction.

Applying the Conflict Process Model in Business Scenarios

In business contexts, the Conflict Process Model has multiple utilities. For starters, it allows managers to identify potential geschillen and address them before they escalate. In situations where conflicts have already arisen, it provides a framework to understand the different stages and dynamics involved in order to strategise an effective resolution approach. For example, if two team members have a disagreement due to miscommunication (Potential Opposition/Incompatibility), the issue might only come to light when their performance or collaboration is affected (Cognition and Personalisation). Depending on how each person decides to react (Intentions), the conflict may either escalate or begin to dissolve. The behaviour stage might include actions like arguments, disagreements, blaming etc. Finally, the conflict's resolution might lead to an improved understanding between the team members, leading to better collaboration in the future (Outcomes).

The Role of Managers in Employing the Conflict Process Model

Managers can play a crucial role in guiding and controlling conflicts in the workplace using the Conflict Process Model. To begin with, managers could identify the possible sources of conflict (Potential Opposition or Incompatibility) and address them proactively. For instance, clear communication, defined roles and responsibilities and fostering an understanding amongst team members could prevent potential conflicts. In the case where conflict has been realised and parties are affected (Cognition and Personalization), managers should try to fully understand the perspectives involved and act as mediators. In the intention stage, managers can guide the involved parties to adopt constructive conflict-handling behaviours which can de-escalate the conflict and promote use of collaboration, compromise and problem-solving rather than negative behaviours like competing or avoiding conflict. During the behaviour stage, managers' conflict management techniques are truly tested as visible signs of conflicts arise. Depending on the strategies adopted, such as negotiation or promoting understanding, conflicts may either be resolved or unfortunately, escalate. In the outcomes stage, regardless of the results, managers can learn valuable lessons, implement necessary changes and reward desirable behaviours, thus promoting a conflict-conducive organisational culture.

Conflict Process Theories and Examples

Exploring theories can provide a comprehensive understanding of the conflict process. Each theory offers valuable insights into the nature, causes, and strategies for conflict resolution. Together, they establish a robust framework that positions managers to effectively handle conflicts within an organisational setting.

Comprehensive Review of Conflict Process Theory

The conflict process theory encompasses numerous strands that individually address different aspects of conflict. Firstly, the psychoanalytic theory of conflict emphasises the intrapsychic processes, whereby conflict is viewed as the product of internal psychological states. This theory advocates for self-awareness to understand the effects of an individual's thoughts, feelings, and behaviours on a conflict situation. Knowledge about these internal processes can facilitate effective conflict resolution strategies. On the other hand, the social identity theory views conflict as stemming from group or 'us' versus 'them' dynamics. It suggests that conflicts are a natural outcome of individuals' desire to enhance their social identity.

---

---

Another influential theory is the game theory, which uses mathematical models to depict conflict situations. Game theory can be used to predict the outcome of a conflict based on individuals' strategies and the potential payoffs. Finally, the integrative theory of conflict integrates the various theoretical perspectives to provide a broad perspective of conflict. Integration theory acknowledges the complexity of conflict, asserting that it results from a multitude of factors- both internal and external.

Manager's Perspective on Conflict Process Theory

From a managerial standpoint, understanding these different theories is crucial. Notably, the psychoanalytic theory sheds light on how conflicts can derive from subconscious feelings and thoughts, helping managers to consider the underlying psychological factors at play in conflict situations. The game theory, however, enables managers to predict the potential outcomes of certain conflict strategies. Managers can use this theory to design incentives and penalties that deter conflict escalation and promote cooperative behaviour. Appreciating the social identity theory can empower managers to create a unified organisational identity, thus mitigating conflicts arising from group dynamics. Lastly, the integrative theory facilitates a more comprehensive understanding of conflict, which empowers managers to adopt a multifaceted approach to conflict management, considering both the internal and external factors influencing a situation.

Real-World Conflict Process Examples in Organisations

Application of these theories can be reflected in real-world conflict examples. In many organisations, conflicts often stem from issues such as resource allocation, decision-making authority, and personal differences among team members. Application of psychoanalytic theory can help understand how individual fears, insecurities and power struggles contribute to such conflicts. For instance, a marketing team in a company might feel under-recognised and undervalued compared to the sales team. This conflict, viewed through the lens of social identity theory, can be understood as arising from the marketing team’s desire for a significant social identity.

How Managers Resolved Conflicts: Examples and Analysis

An example of real-world conflict resolution might see a manager utilising game theory to resolve a conflict between two departments over resource allocation. By foreseeing the potential outcomes of this dispute and formulating strategies that offer the greatest benefit to both parties, the manager can devise a resolution that ensures a win-win situation for both departments. In an instance where the marketing team feels underappreciated, managers can apply psychoanalytic theory by addressing the underlying insecurities and emotions contributing to the conflict head-on. To mitigate 'us vs them' conflicts, managers can utilise the social identity theory by undertaking team building exercises, creating a common organisational goal that transcends individual team objectives. By understanding and utilising these theories, managers can proactively address conflicts, propose mutually favourable solutions, and foster an organisational climate that encourages open communication, collaboration, and mutual respect.