You have probably heard the phrase “hedge your bets.” Hedging is what you do when you want to play it safe, and this goes for your essay-writing as well. However, playing it safe is rarely the right tact in an essay. In fact, when badly mishandled, hedging can devolve into a logical fallacy and destroy your paper.
In writing, hedges are words or phrases that express uncertainty.
It will probably rain today.
“Probably” undercuts the much stronger claim that “it will rain today.” The word “probably” expresses uncertainty about the claim.
Although hedges are not strictly wrong, they are not strong arguments because they are uncertain. This is why they make sense for casual claims about the future, but they do not make much sense for formal claims in an essay.
Hedging Words List
Hedging language is cautious. Too much caution can weaken your point, making your writing vague and less impactful.Here is a list of hedges commonly employed:
Believe
Conceivably
Presumably
Perhaps
Probably
Possibly
Maybe
Seem
Likely
Suggest
Think
These words weaken your argument, so consider whether it is truly important to include before you use one.
Hedging Expressions
As with single words, there are several expressions you can use to hedge your point. Anything that suggests either you don't know, or there is a possibility of doubt, is going to reduce the impact of your statement. Some hedging phrases include it looks like, it appears to be, it could be that, there is a chance that, and so on.
A few common hedging expressions are, according to recent studies, based on limited data, and in the view of many experts. These expressions all distance the writer from the actual claim.
Hedging Examples in an Essay
Your essay comes in three parts: the introduction, body paragraphs, and the conclusion. Here is how hedging should and should not be used in each area.
Hedging in your essay introduction
You should never hedge in your thesisstatement. A thesis statement must be provable and disprovable. If it contains a hedge, it becomes a moving target. Here’s an example:
Hedged thesis: One would think books should not be banned.
This is weak, because how does one prove what "one would think?" This is also very general. Here is a better thesis:
Improved thesis: To protect the freedom of writers and others, books should not be banned by the US government or any other party.
This thesis clearly explains that no books should be banned, not by anyone, not at any time.
Your thesis statement should be as specific as possible. Hedged phrases are always less specific than unhedged phrases because hedges create ambiguity.
Stay organized and focused with your smart to do list
Hedges should not feature in the body paragraphs of your essay. Hedging in your body paragraphs is often a sign that your evidence is weak.
Hedged evidence: Based on this passage, Mr. Woolwick probably doesn’t like to be disturbed while in bed.
What does “probably” prove? Probably not much. If you are not confident enough in your evidence to include it without hedges, then you shouldn’t include it.
Do you want to see this and many more great infographics?
Although for many students, the opposite problem is true. Many students will present perfectly good evidence, and then hedge it just to be on the safe side. Don’t do this! Let your evidence speak for itself. You want to be confident in your essay.
Unhedged evidence: Based on this passage, Mr. Woolwick values his privacy while in his bedchambers—to the point he will become aggressive when confronted thus.
Hedging in your essay conclusion
This is the one time for you to pull out your sheers and get to work on those hedges! In your conclusion, you will discuss other avenues for study and chance at future developments surrounding your topic. In this capacity, you will likely employ hedges to extrapolate how such things might affect your conclusion.
Your goal here is not to hedge your entire essay because you missed a lot. Your goal here is to explain in good faith how your conclusions might change, based on future research and developments.Ideally, this “future research” is not something you could have studied at the time you wrote your essay.
Although this sector of genetics has remained vastly unchanged over the last 25 years, there is a possibility that these conclusions could be at least partially refuted if “gene 404” is successfully mapped.
In a timed essay, use hedges in your conclusion to fill holes. There is no way you can cover an entire topic in 40 minutes, so use hedges to acknowledge any potential shortcomings in your arguments. Again, don’t employ hedges as an excuse to write a weak essay. Employ hedges to explore how a topic can be larger than one small essay.
Access millions of flashcards designed to help you ace your studies
Hedging your essay is usually weak. However, it can tip into the territory of logical fallacy, especially when employed in your body paragraphs, which you should avoid at all costs. Using hedge words in a hedging fallacy can implode your essay.
A fallacy is an error of some kind.
A logical fallacy is employed like a logical reason, but it is actually flawed and illogical.
Here’s how hedging can become fallacious:
The hedging fallacy concedes an argument using a hedge word or phrase to create a new hedged argument, but then dismisses the hedged argument and returns to the original (previously conceded) argument.
In other words, hedge words can be used to make something appear like a concession when it is actually not. There are steps to this logical fallacy.
Hedging fallacy example
In the following example, follow the highlight. Thepink highlight is the hedged answer (it features a bold hedge word), andthe purple highlight is the key dismissal.
The hedged answer is a revised claim that the fallacious party makes. It features a hedge word or phrase to soften the original argument. This hedged answer is not sincere, however. The key dismissal is the indicator that the fallacious party is hedging. It is a phrase that dismisses the hedged argument and refers the other party back to the original argument, despite the fallacious party having conceded it already.
Hedged answers are easy to dismiss in this way because they are not strong and definitive. Middling claims are easier to shove aside than bold ones.
In the following example, Person A will be the fallacious party, while Person B will be the other party, their interlocutor.
Person A: Soccer is a no-skill sport.
Person B: How can some athletes consistently perform so much better than others, then? Take Lionel Messi, for example. He’s received a record seven Ballon d’Or awards.
Person A: Sure, so at the highest level there might be some skill involved, but still.
“So at the highest level there might be some skill involved” is the hedged answer. It is a revised claim. “Might be some” is the hedge phrase that seems to shrink Person A’s stance.
At this point, all seems to be on track. It seems like the argument is continuing logically. However, that all changes when Person A introduces the key dismissal, the utter classic: but still. “But still” is short and unassuming, but the hedging fallacy impinges upon it. “But still” indicates that Person B should refer to Person A’s original argument, despite the fact that Person A has conceded their original argument.
There are some obvious problems with Person A’s logic.
Find relevant study materials and get ready for exam day
To concede an argument is to surrender that argument. Thus, to concede an argument and then to use that argument without surrender is fallacious.
In our example, if Person A had ended the discussion before adding “but still,” that would not have been a logical fallacy. In this event, Person A would have lost the original argument, but left the door open for further arguments.
Here is a way that Person A could have responded to Person B while remaining logical:
Sure, so at the highest level there might be some skill involved. I’ll concede that, but let’s talk about the lower levels. The barrier to entry for soccer is much lower than a sport like baseball, which requires a player with more developed mental and physical skills.
This argument probably won’t hold up, either, but at least Person A is trying to be logical. However, since the definition of “skill” is subjective, this argument will likely conclude with both parties agreeing that the skill it takes to play soccer is a matter of opinion.
It is not fallacious to search for the truth. It is okay to revise a claim. It's not okay, however, to revise a claim superficially and then continue arguing the original claim.
Do you want to see this and many more great infographics?
How we ensure our content is accurate and trustworthy?
At StudySmarter, we have created a learning platform that serves millions of students. Meet
the people who work hard to deliver fact based content as well as making sure it is verified.
Content Creation Process:
Lily Hulatt
Digital Content Specialist
Lily Hulatt is a Digital Content Specialist with over three years of experience in content strategy and curriculum design. She gained her PhD in English Literature from Durham University in 2022, taught in Durham University’s English Studies Department, and has contributed to a number of publications. Lily specialises in English Literature, English Language, History, and Philosophy.
Gabriel Freitas is an AI Engineer with a solid experience in software development, machine learning algorithms, and generative AI, including large language models’ (LLMs) applications. Graduated in Electrical Engineering at the University of São Paulo, he is currently pursuing an MSc in Computer Engineering at the University of Campinas, specializing in machine learning topics. Gabriel has a strong background in software engineering and has worked on projects involving computer vision, embedded AI, and LLM applications.
StudySmarter is a globally recognized educational technology company, offering a holistic learning platform designed for students of all ages and educational levels. Our platform provides learning support for a wide range of subjects, including STEM, Social Sciences, and Languages and also helps students to successfully master various tests and exams worldwide, such as GCSE, A Level, SAT, ACT, Abitur, and more. We offer an extensive library of learning materials, including interactive flashcards, comprehensive textbook solutions, and detailed explanations. The cutting-edge technology and tools we provide help students create their own learning materials. StudySmarter’s content is not only expert-verified but also regularly updated to ensure accuracy and relevance.