Discourse Analysis

Discourse analysis meaning

Discourse analysis (sometimes named discourse studies) is a qualitative research method that involves an in-depth examination of any written, spoken, non-verbal, and visual language in context.

Discourse analysts are interested in how language can impart meaning. This could be vocabulary, use of grammar, gestures, facial expressions, imagery, language techniques, and many more. They analyse whole chunks (rather than individual utterances) of both planned and spontaneous written, spoken, and visual language.

An essential part of discourse analysis is examining language use within its social context. This means the societal norms, political climate, time, place, intended audience, and the speaker's socio-cultural background must all be considered as they can play a role in the meaning of language and how it's interpreted.

Discourse analysis (DA) is a varied and diverse research method used across multiple disciplines, such as linguistics, sociology, media studies, history, and more.

Why conduct discourse analysis?

We analyse discourse to understand the world better and how language is used in real life. By examining the social use of language, we can appreciate its multiple functions, such as creating meaning and maintaining certain social norms and common knowledge.

When to use discourse analysis?

Discourse analysis is the perfect method for looking at the relationship between language and broader social issues, such as language and power, language and gender, language and inequality, and language in the media.

We can also use discourse analysis to see how people interact with each other in different situations and the impact language can have on society and vice versa.

Common examples of discourse we can conduct discourse analysis on are;

• Newspapers

• Novels

• Conversations

• Song lyrics

• Adverts

• Speeches

These are just a few examples - you can really conduct discourse analysis on anything!

Discourse analysis: what's analysed

There are no guidelines on what aspects of language you should analyse when conducting DA. How you undertake your analysis will depend on your research question and the purpose of your study. However, here is a list of language features that are commonly analysed as they can impart meaning.

• Vocabulary - e.g. word choice, jargon, special lexicon.

• Grammar - e.g. type of sentences, grammatical voice, use of affixes.

• Punctuation - e.g. use of exclamation marks, capital letters etc.

• Genre - Is it a newspaper, song, novel, etc.

• Non-verbals - e.g. facial expressions, body language, pauses.

• Paralinguistic features - e.g. tone, pitch, intonation.

• Pragmatics - what are the extended or hidden meanings?

• Grice's conversational maxims - are useful for reviewing power relations in spoken discourse.

• Images and colour - how do they add to the meaning of the discourse?

• Relationship between the discourse and the wider social context

Fig. 1 - Discourse Analysis requires you to 'read between the lines.'

Types of discourse analysis

The two main types of discourse analysis are language-in-use analysis and socio-political analysis.

Let's take a look at each of these in more detail.

Language-in-use discourse analysis

Language-in-use discourse analysis focuses more on the technical details of language, such as grammar, syntax (the arrangement of words, phrases, and clauses), phonetics, phonology, and prosody. A language-in-use approach to DA involves a highly descriptive and in-depth examination of linguistic properties.

Socio-political discourse analysis

This approach is less concerned with the technical details of language, and more focused on the impact language can have on society and vice versa. Socio-political discourse analysis looks at the relationship between language and society, such as language and power.

The most common socio-political discourse analysis approach is critical discourse analysis.

Critical discourse analysis

Critical discourse analysis (CDA) is primarily concerned with language's role in constructing ideology and power. The approach views language as a form of social practice and aims to investigate the ideologies and power dynamics hidden within discourse.

Critical discourse analysis can also be used to critically examine language's role in creating and maintaining social inequality.

Work by the researcher and analyst Norman Fairclough has been highly influential and pioneering in the development of critical discourse analysis as a research method.

The main aims and principles of CDA include;

• To see how language can create and maintain ideologies.

• To uncover power structures.

• To understand how power can be maintained and abused through language.

• To encourage people to question what they are being told and why.

• To give a voice back to historically marginalised or oppressed people.

• Consider how gender, ethnicity, race, and culture are represented and constructed in discourse.

• Recognising the marginalised people in society and who the most powerful are.

According to Fairclough (1984), critical discourse analysis can typically be split into two disciplines: ¹

• Power in discourse - the lexicon, strategies, and language structures used to create power.

• Power behind discourse - The sociological and ideological reasons behind who is asserting power over others and why.

Semiotic analysis

Semiotic analysis is predominantly used for multimodal discourse (usually printed communication mediums containing words, images, graphics, colours, etc.).

When conducting semiotic analysis, we take a medium of communication (e.g., a website, poster, textbook, or advertisement) and interpret the denotative (literal) and connotative (implied) meaning of the different types of discourse working together in context.

Semiotic analysis recognises that written and spoken language isn't the only part of discourse that can carry meaning, and it's important to consider how things such as imagery can significantly impact how we interpret things.

Discourse analysis methodology

Discourse analysis is an interdisciplinary research method (i.e. used across many subjects); therefore, research methods will vary depending on the subject, purpose of the study, and research question.

There is no right or wrong way to conduct discourse analysis - which is good news as it's difficult to get it wrong. However, this doesn't help when the time comes to conduct your analysis, and you don't know where to start!

With this in mind, we've compiled a useful 'tool kit' based on Fairclough's (1995) three-dimensional model to help you get started.²

Fairclough's model proposes discourse be analysed in three stages:

• Description - analysis of the text itself, including grammar, syntax, lexicon, phonological features, literary devices (e.g. rhetorical questions), and images.

• Interpretation - how discourse is produced and distributed and then consumed by the reader/listener, i.e. who is the author and the audience.

• Explanation - viewing the discourse as a social practice and placing it in the context of wider society.

Fig. 2 - Fairclough's three-dimensional model.

When conducting discourse analysis, you should also ask yourself the following questions;

• Who wrote this text, and who is it intended for?

• What narrative is being promoted?

• Who benefits from this text? Who is marginalised by it?

• Is the evidence credible?

• What ideas are normalised by this discourse, and what are disqualified?

• How do the images, colours, text, etc., work together if it is a multimodal text?

Discourse analysis example

For this example, we will conduct a discourse analysis on song lyrics using Fairclough's three-dimensional model. The chosen song is 'British Bombs' by Declan Mckenna (2019).

We have decided to undertake a socio-political analysis due to the genre of the discourse (a song) and the evident political influence behind the lyrics.

1. Description (analysis of the language itself)

This is a pop/rock song with somewhat emotive language, which can be seen in thought-provoking words and phrases, such as 'My baby brother has already got a gas mask' and 'Killing with your hands tied'. Repetition of the word great and alliteration of the letter B have been used to draw connections between 'Great Britain' and 'Great British bombs'.

The terms 'Great snakes' and 'Good gravy' were common phrases in 1920-30s Britain. Mckenna may be trying to allude to British attitudes and society during the World War era, which are often described as being ignorant and overly patriotic.

2. Interpretation (the author and the audience and their potential interpretation)

The song was written by a young British musician and will likely be listened to by predominantly young British people. Mckenna may be using his music to draw his audience's attention to the use of British bombs in Yemen.

The lyrics 'Set sail babe we read it in the mail - no hope now' may be criticising the British newspaper The Daily Mail, which has often been accused of presenting a biased view of British politics. In doing this, he may influence listeners to consider where they get their news.

Mckenna uses slang associated with younger generations, such as 'hun' in the line 'Great way to fool me again, hun'. Using recognisable language may engage his audience and potentially encourage them to think more about politics.

3. Explanation (placing discourse into wider societal context)

The line 'Great British bombs in the Yemen' is likely referring to the UK's sale of British-produced bombs to Saudi Arabia, which they have dropped on civilians in Yemen since 2015.³

By placing the lyrics into a socio-political context, we can interpret that McKenna finds the use of British bombs hypocritical, which is arguably highlighted in the following lyrics, 'Great Britain won't stand for felons. Great British bombs in the Yemen.'