Descriptivism

Features of descriptivism

Here are the key things to remember about descriptivism:

What are some descriptivism examples?

Let's compare the use of two phrases, "If I were you" and "If I was you":

• 'If I were you' is considered Standard English, and therefore grammatically correct from a prescriptivist perspective.

• 'If I was you' is considered to be Non-Standard English, and therefore grammatically incorrect from a prescriptivist perspective. However, it is frequently used by English speakers in day-to-day language.

A descriptivist would take the position that neither phrase is incorrect, as they both function in a way other English speakers can comprehend. As long as language can be understood, descriptivism argues no use of language is wrong.

Descriptivism: descriptivist philosophy

Today, the majority of academic linguists take a descriptivist approach.

The focus in linguistics is typically less on the rules of the English language, and more on the use of language in different contexts and among diverse communities.

• Descriptivism is the preferred approach for analysing language, which makes it perfect for academic linguists who study languages around the world.

• The analytical nature of descriptivism makes it a useful approach for analysing literature, as it allows for interpretation, unlike prescriptivism which evaluates language according to correctness.

Fig. 2 - Descriptivism allows us to interpret language according to different contexts.

Benefits of descriptivism

Descriptivism has particular benefits that make it the preferred approach:

• It has destigmatised certain kinds of language.

• In terms of non-standard speech varieties, descriptivism provides an analysis of language that is neither hierarchical nor critical, as prescriptivism tends to be.

• It looks at socially-stigmatised groups and their use of language in an analytical and non-judgmental way, and can help to bridge the gap between social groups.

• It offers a more accurate reflection of language use across the world than the prescriptivist approach. This is because it focuses on studying language as it is used in daily life.

• It accounts for the ways languages evolve in different communities.

Shortfalls of descriptivism

There are areas in which descriptivism is not the preferred approach when observing language usage:

• Consider those learning English for the first time. Prescriptivism might be the preferred approach as new learners would need to be aware of the rules of the language they are learning.

• Descriptivism is a good approach for analysing language, but not necessarily for teaching language. In professional environments or when writing formally, for example, one would need to know the rules of the English language. It is important to be aware of when and where to use 'correct' grammar.

Linguistic descriptivism in the future

In the future, descriptivism may prove to be the more useful linguistic approach in mapping the evolution of language use around the world.

While prescriptivism can help us map the grammatical and structural rules of a language, descriptivists will be able to analyse how language evolves over time.

As our society continues to change and new forms of communication emerge, the descriptivist approach will help ensure that we are able to keep pace with these developments and document language as it actually exists. With its focus on inclusivity and respect for linguistic diversity, the descriptivist approach will remain an important tool for understanding and appreciating the complexity and richness of human language.