Mikhail Gorbachev

Mikhail Gorbachev and the USSR

When Gorbachev’s predecessor, Leonid Brezhnev, died in 1982, Soviet economic growth had stalled and had even become negative in some instances. As early as 1965, Soviet economist Abel Aganbegyan elucidated that the rate of economic growth was slowing, just as the American economy was becoming stronger. Aganbegyan pointed to the preposterous resources the USSR devoted to the military and the extreme centralisation of the Soviet economy.

The arms race with America, the war in Afghanistan and the great subsidies handed out to communist states around the world were a further burden on the already overstretched Soviet economy.

Gorbachev’s decisions and reforms were therefore seen as essential to turn the Soviet economy and make it successful again.

Mikhail Gorbachev and the Chernobyl disaster

The 1986 Chernobyl disaster, wherein a faulty nuclear reactor released massive quantities of radioactive material into the environment, further highlighted the failings of the Soviet system. Soviet technologies proved to be unreliable, poorly maintained, and resistant to change. Gorbachev himself wrote in his memoirs that the incident at Chernobyl was a turning point for communism, noting that the system could not continue as it had been. Arguably, the lethargic and self-interested response of the Communist Party in solving the crisis prompted the moral and intellectual critique of communism that inspired these reforms.

Gorbachev had inherited control of a state where corruption was rife, and the economy was stagnating. The floundering Soviet economy and the blatant need for change in the Communist Party were Gorbachev’s justification for reforms. This reformist doctrine was called the ‘New Political Thinking’ and included his policies of glasnost and perestroika.

In 1985, Gorbachev gave a speech to Congress, laying out what these changes would mean for the Communist Party and Soviet people, saying, "[these changes] mean the scientific and technical updating of production and the attainment of the highest world level of labour productivity. [They] mean the improvement of social relations, first of all, economic relations. [They] mean profound changes in the sphere of labour and people’s material and spiritual living conditions. [They] mean the invigoration of the entire system of political and public institutions, the deepening of socialist democracy, and self-government by the people."

Fig. 2 - Reactor 4, several months after the Chernobyl disaster.

Gorbachev's glasnost

Glasnost, meaning ‘openness’ was demanded at the Glasnost Rally as early as 1965. In 1986, Gorbachev and his cabinet adopted the term as a political policy. The movement towards glasnost became a political tool for Gorbachev to discredit the conservative opposition to his reformist policies. Initially, this openness had a very small scope, but over the course of Gorbachev’s regime, the policy expanded.

Glasnost focused on social reform, with the particular aim of increasing transparency in government processes and including the masses in making decisions. Civil liberties like freedom of speech and freedom of information were remarkably expanded. This was meant to allow the people of the USSR to reflect on their problems and discuss potential solutions.

As a direct consequence, the glasnost allowed greater freedom for the Soviet public to speak freely, allowing for the criticism of Soviet leaders, the re-examination of Soviet history, and an open debate on the actions of past governments such as the Purges. Political dissidents were released from prisons, the persecution of the Churches ceased, and liberty to travel to Western countries was introduced. Glasnost was also perceived by some in the West to be part of a new foreign policy of openness towards more democratic states.

However, while the introduction of glasnost was meant to strengthen the USSR, it had the opposite effect. Glasnost was used to allow blame to be passed on to former Soviet leaders, but it eventually became the channel through which the call for the democratisation of the Soviet Union would be amplified. Glasnost ultimately permitted dramatic changes in Soviet media and the end of single-party domination.

Gorbachev's perestroika

Perestroika focused on the restructuring of the Communist Party and the Soviet economy. Gorbachev first used the term during a speech in 1986.

The policy promoted market-like reforms, allowing small-scale private enterprises, collective ownership of businesses, worker cooperatives, and the elimination of centralised control over quotas. State enterprises still had to fulfil orders from the Party but were now free to do what they wanted with their remaining goods, based on consumer demand and the actions of other enterprises.

However, perhaps the most radical reform to the economy was the authorisation of foreign investment into the Soviet Union. The structure of the Communist Party also saw massive changes. As Gorbachev said to the Supreme Court in 1988, "The time has come when we can expect nothing from further instructions from above, when we must actively implement the adopted decisions everywhere: in every collective, in every city and village. Here a very important role belongs to the soviets, as genuine bodies of people’s rule".

Thus, perestroika entailed a process of democratisation or demokratizatsiya.

From January 1987 onwards, Gorbachev announced that members of local councils would be elected by the people and not the Party. Direct elections were also announced for several significant roles within the Communist Party.

From 1988 onwards, a new parliament called the Congress of People’s deputies was established. This parliament became the highest institution of power in the Soviet Union. Congress would have two-thirds of its members elected by universal suffrage and one-third elected from public organisations, such as the Communist Party. Gorbachev assumed the role of executive President, much like in the American system.

What was Mikhail Gorbachev’s foreign policy?

As Paul Demakis, former US State Representative, argued in 2009, Gorbachev identified that

This outsized spending on the military led to budget cuts in education, healthcare, and social services, which damaged the regime’s domestic popularity. As such, Gorbachev took a very different approach to foreign policy than his predecessors.

He emphasised that the world’s nations are inextricably linked and made clear his commitment to nuclear disarmament, declaring in the 27th Party Congress of 1986 that

Gorbachev’s New Thinking Policy opened the doors to cooperative diplomacy between the US and the USSR. He moved away from the soviet concept of ‘international class struggle’, which stated that the working class of all nations must act together to replace capitalism with communism. He also ended the Brezhnev Doctrine, which promised Soviet intervention in any event where a socialist state was threatened.

Gorbachev instead encouraged the Sinatra Doctrine (alluding to the Frank Sinatra song ‘My Way’), which described the USSR’s new policy of allowing the Soviet bloc to determine its own internal affairs. In May of 1988, Soviet forces withdrew from Afghanistan, underscoring the nation’s new policy of avoiding conflict wherever possible.

With Gorbachev’s reforms, Reagan relaxed his hostile rhetoric towards the Soviet Union. Instead of opposing Reagan, Gorbachev’s priority was to reduce the toll of the Cold War on the USSR and thus complied with many of Reagan’s demands. This agreement between the two powers led to the strategic arms reduction summit in Reykjavik in 1986 and the historic Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty of 1987, which banned intermediate-range nuclear missiles.

Mikhail Gorbachev’s significance

Gorbachev sought to completely reform the Soviet economy, political system, and relations with foreign powers. He dismantled the long-standing command economy, the rigorous censorship that hushed any criticism of communism, and introduced democracy into the Party.

However, he failed to account for all of the changes that would occur because of these reforms. The dismantling of the command economy and the introduction of capitalist elements ultimately undermined the entire system. Moreover, the freedoms introduced by glasnost allowed for an ideological revolution that diminished the legitimacy of the Communist Party’s rule.

Historian Stephen Kotkin argues that

However, other historians argue that the economic decline of the Soviet Union ultimately led to the dissolution of the USSR and the end of the Cold War. They would argue that Gorbachev’s reforms were ‘too little too late’.

Raymond Pearson states that