Crime and Punishment in Industrial Britain

Crime and punishment and the Industrial Revolution

With the rise of industry, young people flocked to towns and cities in search of work. No longer needing to labour long hours on rural farms, people began to marry earlier, and as a result, have more children. This caused the population to dramatically increase, with the population in England and Wales swelling from about 6.1 million in 1750 to 17.9 million in 1851.

With so many people in such crowded conditions, crime thrived, with an abundance of young men, who were the most likely culprits of this new crime wave. Statistically, crime steadily increased from about 1750 to the mid-19th century, followed by a steady decline until the early years of the 20th century. This also correlates with a general increase in living standards during this later period.

The Industrial Revolution also specifically impacted punishment in several ways:

• The increase in crime associated with urbanisation made current punishments (such as the death sentence for even minor crimes) unfeasible.

• The justice system began to focus on rehabilitating criminals instead of exclusively using punishment as a deterrent.

• With many crimes now taking place regarding the theft of goods and property, crime rates highlighted wider societal issues, and therefore punishment also needed to take into account other factors.

Crime and punishment 1750 to 1900

Now we have a broad overview of what crime and punishment looked like in the industrial period, let's find out more about why people committed crimes, what types of crime were common, and how exactly these criminals were punished.

Crime rates during the Industrial Revolution

It has widely been accepted that crime rates increased throughout the Industrial period, but several factors influenced this.

For a start, crime statistics before industrialisation were practically non-existent as the justice system was heavily localised, relying on parish constables to deal with criminals. Statistics that emerged later are also hard to assess as the increasing amount of resources dedicated to catching criminals led to more arrests.

It is therefore quite difficult to assess specific crime statistics from this period.

Reasons for crime

With people living in ways they never had before, in quantities they never had before, the types of crimes people committed and why they committed them took a sudden detour. In many newly emerging industrialised cities, people resorted to crime for several reasons:

Types of crime

The nature of crime varied from petty theft to violent crime. There is usually a particular emphasis on petty theft, considering it accounted for 75% of recorded crime in London at the time, compared to 10% for violent crime.

In terms of violent crime, higher wages and more work could result in higher consumption of alcohol, which in turn resulted in a higher rate of violent crime. The press often focused on these violent crimes, as they could affect all reaches of society and be used to cause hysteria and sell newspapers. For example, the 1862 mugging of Hugh Pilkington MP horrified the public and was used to demonstrate the high incidence of crime in cities at the time.

Smuggling and poaching continued as they had in the medieval and pre-industrialisation periods but seriously intensified. With the development of more roads meaning more goods/money on the move, often violent highway robberies became a huge issue.

The general public found murder cases particularly concerning, with the media closely following the ‘Jack the Ripper’ murders of the 1880s in Whitechapel. The fact that the killer was never found only produced more hysteria.

Fig. 2 Discovery of Mary Ann Nichols, Jack the Ripper's first victim

Although crime was higher in urban slum areas, it certainly was not confined to these areas, occurring in wealthier suburbs and rural areas, with widespread unrest at the time.

A significant aspect that emerged from industrialisation was public unrest. In an era with such social, political and economic change, many working-class people still did not have the right to vote. As a result, the public reacted through protest and even rioting.

Public Unrest and the Peterloo Massacre

An event that sums up this changing landscape is the Peterloo Massacre of 1819. The massacre occurred in St. Peter’s Field in Manchester and is of particular significance as the events are reflective of the rapidly changing circumstances at the time.

In terms of maintaining public order, Peterloo demonstrated the need for a defined police force that could maintain order, as opposed to militias and other military units as had been used previously.

Fig. 3 Peterloo Massacre

Around the same time as the Peterloo massacre, an organisation known as the Luddites was formed in 1811 made up of textile workers who opposed automation. It quickly gained support across England, and its actions included protest and in some cases destruction of machinery. In response, 12,000 soldiers were deployed to suppress the Luddites. Machine breaking became a capital crime and harsher sentences were introduced, with the trial of prominent Luddites usually in the public eye. This legal and military suppression would eventually kill the movement, with the movement largely extinct by 1817.

Changing punishment in Industrial Britain

Just as crime had changed, punishment needed to change in retaliation. People were uneasy about crime due to overcrowding, poor conditions, and media representations - a strong reaction was necessary.

Various political reforms were introduced, from better-lit streets to vast prison construction projects. The government also used a harsh set of laws known as the bloody code to enforce law and order. This led to a greater number of people being sentenced to death.

In terms of specific punishment, the period was rather experimental.

• Older, ‘shaming’ punishments such as the pillory or the stocks were phased out.

• For more serious crimes the use of public execution began to be seen as inhumane, with the Bloody Code eventually being dismantled, fewer hangings later taking place and public executions being phased out entirely in 1868.

• For many, the solution was transportation to one of Britain's colonies, many of which were short of labour. America's 13 colonies were initially used, but upon their independence in 1776, attention was turned to Australia.

• Once this became unsustainable, attention was turned to large-scale prisons.

Prisons and incarceration

Previously, most prisoners had been incarcerated in old ships (known as convict hulks) and other temporary arrangements.

These served as both a punishment and a means to keep criminals away from the general public in the face of overcrowded, insufficient prisons. However, this was incompatible with modern Victorian ideals and the government embarked on a campaign to construct prisons in large numbers.

In the period between 1840 and 1877 for example, 90 prisons were constructed, an unprecedented number even by today's standards. Examples of these prisons include Pentonville (1842) in London, Strangeways (1868) in Manchester and Mountjoy (1850) in Dublin.

Prison began to attempt to rehabilitate prisoners in conjunction with punishing them, with prisons designed to be less crowded, more liveable and more efficient for guards. Although this was a significant shift in attitudes towards incarceration, transportation to Australia continued until the 1860s, not being completely phased out until 1875.

By 1900, many of the older practices had died out; the industrialisation period and immediate aftermath had certainly provided a unique period of experimentation and reform in terms of both crime and punishment.

Famous criminals and figures in the Industrial Revolution period

Industrial Britain produced some noteworthy criminals and figures, many of which are still talked about today.

• Jack the Ripper: The most famous criminal of the period and perhaps in British history, Jack the Ripper was the name given to an unidentified serial killer active in Whitechapel in the second half of 1888.

• John Bellingham: Bellingham was responsible for the 1812 assassination of British Prime Minister Spencer Perceval, the only Prime Minister to be assassinated. He was later hanged.

• Celestina Sommer: She was convicted of murdering her daughter in 1856 - this case ignited debate on capital punishment, crime and insanity, and crime and gender. She was deemed fit for trial but eventually transferred to a lunatic asylum where she died in 1859.

Fig. 4 Newspaper illustration of Jack the Ripper

• John William Bean: He attempted to shoot Queen Victoria in 1842 to secure transportation to Australia.

• John Babbacombe Lee: Lee was a convicted murderer who survived three attempts to hang him and had his sentence changed to life imprisonment.

• Richard Carlile: Carlile was a political agitator who was arrested in the aftermath of the Peterloo massacre for publishing material that might encourage people to hate the government.

• Sherlock Holmes: British author Sir Arthur Conan Doyle created the fictional detective in 1887, demonstrating a public fascination with crime.

With the increase in crime due to the impact of rapid industrialisation and urbanisation, punishment altered significantly. Punishment throughout the 19th century would be radically new and at times experimental, but would gradually alter to resemble punishment in the modern world. This can be attributed to new ways of thinking, adjustment to conditions and new circumstances. With improving economic conditions a gap between rich and poor would emerge, facilitating the theft of the vast array of wealth on display. Industrialisation and the new crime and punishment it would spawn would ultimately inspire a vast array of social, political and economic movements, further formulating new types of crime and punishment in itself.