Collectivisation

Collectivisation in Russia

In the Soviet Union, collectivisation was the process of turning individual farms, controlled by one person, to collective farms, owned by the state on which numerous different people worked. The change to collective farming was brought on by Stalin's new economic policy, the First Five-Year Plan, and would continue to be a staple aspect of these plans for decades to come.

When the State Planning Committee was setting up the First Five-Year Plan under the orders of Stalin, collectivisation was seen as the best way to increase the USSR's output of grain. While the focus of the First Five-Year Plan was industrialisation, grain and food production still needed to rise to keep up with the demand of a bigger workforce and an expanding army. Equally, Stalin wanted to reduce the power of the Kulaks, a class of peasant farmers who had grown fairly wealthy from running their individual farms.

Collectivisation of Agriculture in USSR

Here is how collectivisation of agriculture was supposed to be carried out in the USSR:

• Small independent farms were destroyed, and the peasants who worked on them were sent to the larger collective farms, called kolkhozy.

• The state supplied these new farms with modern farming machinery like tractors to make grain production more efficient.

• Peasants not only worked on these farms, but they also lived there as well, with their families - they were essentially farming communes.

Fig. 1 - An old kolkhoz

However, the process was far from simple. Unsurprisingly, the Kulaks did not want to leave their farms which had been so profitable for them. When collectivisation became forced, rather than just encouraged, in 1931, the Kulaks responded by burning their crops, killing their livestock, and destroying their machinery so that the state could not use it. This left the new farms at quite a disadvantage, as the idea had been to use the already existing machinery and animals to kickstart the collective farms.

Effects of Collectivisation

The process of collectivisation had a drastic effect on the lives of millions in the USSR, yet its impact on the agricultural sector of the Soviet economy was less than what Stalin had intended.

Food Output

Under collectivisation, the output of grain did rise; however, the statistics produced by the USSR are to be taken with a hefty grain of salt. Stalin was hardly above inflating the figures for grain output to make the USSR look better, and it was in his best interest to do so.

Since the 1930s, the figures produced by the Soviet Union have been re-examined and adjusted to try and reflect the actual output, but it is still uncertain. We are left with the figures given by the USSR in the 1930s and the estimates of the actual output made by the West. The table below shows the difference between the two sets of statistics for grain output.

While the patterns for both sets of statistics are broadly the same, the differences in output estimates suggest that collectivisation was not providing the agricultural transformation that the USSR needed and that Stalin wanted. Obviously, there were extenuating circumstances in some of these years: the revolt of the Kulaks during the initial stages of collectivisation hindered progress, as did the drought in 1931. However, the USSR generally failed to meet the ambitious targets set under Stalin's Five-Year Plans, with the initial goals almost always having to be cut down for a number of reasons.

Fig. 2 - Soviet leader during collectivisation, Joseph Stalin

There were also issues with livestock - the number of livestock on the kolkhozy dropped with the introduction of collectivisation due to the revolt of the Kulaks as well as the drought and famine between 1931-34. It wasn't until 1935 that livestock numbers began to rise back up to their 1929 levels. During its initial years, collectivisation was causing more problems than it was solving.

Collectivisation: Famine

From 1931 to 1934, the Soviet Union experienced one of the worst famines in its history, with around 5-8 million people dying from starvation.

This famine was, in a large part, caused by the impact of the First-Year Plan and the collectivisation of agriculture - here is why:

• The priority given to industrialisation meant that the agricultural workforce was shrinking at the exact time it needed to be expanding.

• The resistance of the Kulaks to collectivisation resulted in the loss of lots of crops and livestock, slowing down agricultural production on the collective farms.

• Collective, state-owned farms meant that there was practically no limit on how much grain the state could requisition from these farms. With the rapid expansion of an industrial workforce, construction and urban centres, the state gave priority for food to them, leaving very little left for the agricultural workforce.

• The state also wanted to export as much grain as possible to finance industrial expansion.

• Farmland was over-planted, the soil was not rejuvenated, and there was little food for livestock, all of which hindered agricultural progress - the leaders of the Soviet Union ignored these issues, meaning they only got worse over time.

All of these factors contributed to a severe lack of food for those living in the agricultural regions of the USSR during the early 1930s.

Estimates of how many died in the Holodomor famine have varied over the years, with current estimates standing at around 3.9 million out of the 5-8 million total deaths in the USSR during the 1931-4 period of famine. While the label of genocide is still contested amongst historians (though recognised by Ukraine), it is clear that the effects of the policy of collectivisation contributed significantly to the famine in the USSR and were manipulated by Stalin in order to target Ukraine and its people.

Collectivisation: Summary

By 1936, with many casualties along the way, just over 90% of farmland in the Soviet Union fell to collectivization. With much of the country under socialist policies, Stalin turned inward in the late 1930s, seeking to purge any potential opposition within his party. World War II resulted in some reversal of collectivisation with German occupation but this was not long-lasting.

Fig. 3 - Soviet stamp praising the Virgin Lands campaign

Stalin's less hardline successor, Nikita Khrushchev announced the Virgin Lands campaign in 1953 where unfarmed lands in Kazakhstan provided temporary respite to the food shortages.