Russification

Why was Russification important to the Tsars?

Tsarist Russia was culturally diverse and inhabited by over 100 different ethnic groups. Only 55% of Russian citizens considered themselves Russian, with the rest identifying with other nationalities.

Northern European Russia consisted of Lithuanians, Latvians, Finns, and Estonians, each with their own national culture. In addition, most of the land in the Baltics was owned by Lutheran Germans. Western Russia was the home of Catholic Poles and most of the Russian Jews. The Ukrainians, Romanians, Georgians, and Azerbaijanis all considered themself separate nations. Russian expansion into Asia meant that the number of Muslims in the Empire was growing, reaching 10 million by 1900.

Ruling such a diverse empire was a challenge for the Tsars. The development of a national ideology from 1815 led to ethnic groups asserting their own foreign identity and independence from Russia. Supporters of Russification believed Russification was necessary to allow for modernisation and to reassert Russia’s greatness.

Other factors influenced the turn towards Russification. Germany had been growing stronger since 1870 and was imposing its own ‘Germanisation’ in minority areas. Russia’s economic development encouraged centralisation (consolidating power under central control, at the expense of local self-government). This in turn encouraged Russification. The historian Walter Moss argues that Russification can also be understood as part of the ‘counter-reform mentality’,¹ as a reaction to the changes threatening Russian autocracy and the stability of the Empire.

Russification under Alexander II

Alexander II was initially more tolerant of minority groups than his predecessor, Nicholas I.

This changed after the 1863 Polish uprising, in which more than 200,000 Poles rebelled against Russian rule. Alexander responded harshly, exiling, executing, and confiscating land from, the leaders of the uprising.

Fig. 2 - January Uprising

In other areas, foreign national identity did not threaten the security of the Russian Empire and Alexander was more accommodating. He used concessions to keep control over rebellious provinces. For example, he allowed the Finns to have their own diet (parliament) and permitted Lutheranism amongst the Estonians and Latvians. These compromises reduced the risk of another uprising.

In Alexander II’s later years he became less tolerant of national differences. His conservative ministers believed that ethnic and religious diversity threatened Russia. Russian language and culture were promoted above all else. For example, Russian was made the only official administrative language.

Russification under Alexander III

Konstantin Pobedonostsev, Alexander III’s tutor and Procurator of the Holy Synod, believed in ‘Autocracy, Orthodoxy, Nationality. Alexander III was heavily influenced by his views and pursued cultural Russification.

Cultural Russification aimed to unite all the Tsar’s subjects under a shared national identity. Pobedonostsev believed that political and religious unity was necessary to achieve a harmonious society, and any Western influence would degrade Russian culture. He argued for a policy of isolationism from non-Russian countries.

What were the effects of Russification?

Let’s study the main effects that Russification had on the different parts of the Russian empire.

On Russian language and culture:

• Russian was declared the official first language.

• Public office was limited to those who spoke Russian fluently.

• The use of foreign languages was restricted, e.g. in 1864 speaking Polish or Belarusian in public was banned.

Russification of Finland:

• In 1892, the Finnish diet’s influence was limited.

• Russian coins replaced Finnish currency.

Russification of Poland:

• Speaking Polish or Belarusian in public was banned.

• All subjects except Polish language and religion had to be taught in Russian.

• The Polish administration was changed to prevent attempts at independence.

Russification of the Baltic area:

• Russian was made mandatory in state offices, schools, the police force, and the judiciary.

Russification of Ukraine:

• In 1883, laws were passed to limit the use of Ukrainian.

• In 1884, all theatres were closed.

• Military conscripts were separated to prevent radical national groups from forming.

Uprisings were forcibly suppressed in Georgia, Bashkiria, and what would become modern-day Uzbekistan.

Russification and the Orthodox Church

The Orthodox Church taught that the Tsar was chosen by God. Any criticism of the Tsar or his rule was said to be an insult to God.

Laws were passed to benefit Orthodox Christians and encourage Russians of other faiths to convert. In Poland, Catholic monasteries were closed down and non-Catholics were encouraged to settle there. In Asia, missionaries conducted forced mass baptisms to convert ‘heathens and Muslims’.

Fig. 3 - Zimne Monastery as catholic church

From 1883, members of non-Orthodox churches were forbidden to build places of worship, wear religious clothing outside of their meeting places, spread religious propaganda, or try to convert Orthodox Christians.

Negative effects of social and cultural change

Russification led to popular disturbances and increased resentment amongst national minorities, especially the more educated Finns, Poles, and Baltic Germans. For example, a Polish underground education network was established to secretly teach in Polish. Books in the local language were exchanged and some ethnic schools survived.

Russification was intended to unite the country, but instead, it intensified national feelings amongst minorities and fuelled resentment towards the Empire. Wealthier citizens emigrated to foreign countries, taking valuable talent and resources away from Russia. Others were persuaded to join opposition groups.

What effect did Russification have on Jews?

With their distinct ethnic background, religion, and culture, Russian Jews suffered under Russification.

Anti-semitism under Alexander II

Anti-semitism was common in the Russian Empire and Jews were excluded from everyday society, forced to live in a Western area of the Russian Empire called the Pale of the Settlement. Under Alexander II, some of these restrictions were lifted and Jews were able to integrate more into Russian society. However, this increased anti-semitism as many enjoyed commercial success, which led to resentment amongst poorer Russians.

Anti-semitism under Alexander III

Pobedonostsev, Alexander's advisor, was avowedly anti-Semitic and in the press, Jews were blamed for the assassination of Alexander II. There was a vicious circle of anti-Semitism:

Fig. 4 - Diagram showing the vicious circle of anti-Semitism - StudySmarter Originals.

The Jewish pogroms 1881–84

In April 1881 pogroms (anti-Semitic attacks) broke out in Ukraine. The violence may have been encouraged by the Okhrana, and the ‘Holy League’ supported by Pobedonostsev helped coordinate early attacks. The riots spread across Ukraine and beyond, with around 16 major cities affected. Jewish property was burnt, shops were destroyed, and Jews were attacked, raped, and murdered. Governing authorities were slow to respond and the violence continued into 1884.

Anti-Semitic legislation

The May Laws of 1882 banned Jews from living outside major towns, from renting property, and from conducting business on Sundays. Anti-Semitic legislation increased, for example:

• In 1887 quotas were introduced, restricting the numbers of Jews who could attend university

• In 1892 Jews were banned from local elections and dumas

• Laws were passed restricting Jewish movement and settlement, effectively creating Jewish districts in the Pale

What was the impact of anti-Semitism?

To some extent, anti-Semitism succeeded in segregating and driving away Jews. Many Jews left the country following the pogroms and others were forcibly expelled. In 1891, 10,000 Jewish artisans were expelled from Moscow, with over 20,000 expelled in 1892. The Jews that remained in Russia were forced to live in Jewish districts and had their rights curtailed.

References

1. Walter Moss, A history of Russia since 1855, 2003.