Northern and Southern Advantages in the Civil War
When it came to military strategy, leaders of both the Union and the Confederacy needed to consider their respective advantages. We can get an idea of these advantages in the table below:
Northern Advantages | Southern Advantages |
| More experienced and knowledgeable military leaders Larger territory and familiarity with the terrain Trade relationships with England and France
|
Interestingly, upon evaluation, both the North and the South believed they would earn a swift victory. The North was counting on its infrastructure, and the South believed several major victories would make the Union abandon the war effort altogether. But the First Battle of Bull Run made both sides realize the war was going to take longer than they thought and that they needed to re-evaluate strategy. It was a long and bloody battle that foreshadowed what was to come.
Union Military Strategy During the Civil War
At the beginning of the war, the explicit Northern goal was to unify the nation. Essentially, the North was fighting a war of attrition where they needed to overpower and outlast the South’s capabilities so that they would give up and return to the Union. Winfield Scott, an American military leader, suggested the Anaconda Plan to strangle the South into submission.
Northern Civil War Military Strategies: The Anaconda Plan
The Anaconda Plan was to create a naval blockade surrounding the entire South so that food and supplies could not get through. While the South was prepared to acquire supplies without the North, their plan was to turn to Europe. And without access to European trade, the South was left without much-needed supplies. The suspension of the cotton trade also left the South without necessary funding. This was detrimental enough, but eventually, the North also gained control of the Mississippi River, which essentially cut the South in half.
Fig. 1 - illustration of the Anaconda Plan
Northern Civil War Military Strategies: Lincoln’s Strategy at the Beginning of the War
As we noted above, at the beginning of the war, the goal was to preserve the Union, and President Abraham Lincoln did not have a particular interest in bringing an end to slavery. In fact, he believed such a move would alienate border states that still had slaves. Instead, he focused on the Anaconda Plan and cracked down on so-called copperheads that threatened the war effort.
copperheads
Confederate sympathizers living in the North
Fig, 2 - Abraham Lincoln
Executive Power during the War
After the breakout of the Civil War, President Lincoln expanded the scope of executive power in the name of preserving the Union. He touted this wartime power with several unprecedented actions and executive orders, including the institution of martial law and the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus. Active in rebellious areas, including border states, martial law replaced civilian authorities (i.e., police) with military authority. And, instead of going before civilian courts, those deemed rebels went before military tribunals.
The suspension of the writ of habeas corpus meant that authorities could detain and arrest alleged rebels without a court trial or any indication of how long they would be detained. The goal of this suspension as well as martial law was to prevent the copperheads from gaining any real ground in shifting the alignment of border states. Additionally, these actions helped fight draft evasion.
Northern Civil War Military Strategies: The Shift in Lincoln’s Strategy
As the war carried on, it became clear to President Lincoln that Northern morale was falling rapidly, and draft riots were just one of the symptoms. In a strategic decision, Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which shifted the goal of the war to ending slavery and provided renewed vigor in the North.
Southern Civil War Military Strategy
While the North was going on the offensive, the South was on the defensive, trying to prevent the Union from encroaching on Confederate territory. While they began with the cordon defense which placed Confederate forces on the borders of Southern territory, they soon turned to an offensive-defensive method. Using the offensive-defensive method, they went on the offensive only when they were sure to be successful, such as when they overpowered Union troops in numbers
Overall, many of the strategies the South implemented did not have the desired results, and sometimes Southerners outright rejected strategies introduced by leaders before they could even implement them. We can take a look at the key examples in the table below:
Southern Strategy | Reason for Failure |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Fig. 3 - Depiction of the USS Merrimack, the first iron-clad ship made by the Confederates
The Success of Northern Civil War Strategies
So, as you can see, Southerners’ actual desires often came into conflict with Southern military strategies and interests. While the Confederacy needed to unite and make sacrifices to win the war, the ever-present issue of states’ rights prevented leaders from taking decisive action (e.g., instituting an income tax or draft). The Confederacy continued to face severe food and supply shortages, and eventually, war weariness took its toll. The North had won its war of attrition, and Confederate forces surrendered.
Civil War Military Strategies - Key takeaways
- Both the North and the South thought they would have a swift victory, but realized it was going to be a long war after the First Battle of Bull Run.
- The North was fighting a war of attrition, believing that their superior infrastructure would eventually overpower the South. The Anaconda Plan was a naval blockade that prevented food and supplies from entering the South, with the goal of forcing surrender.
- Just as morale was at an all-time low in the North, Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which shifted the goal of the war to ending slavery and increased morale once again. It also dashed Confederate hopes of a British or French intervention.
- The South was fighting a defensive war, hoping a series of major victories would lower morale and make the North abandon the war effort. Decisive action was difficult because Southern interests did not always align with Southern military interests.
- The North's military strategies reigned supreme. The South continued to suffer from severe food and supply shortages and eventually surrendered to the North's attrition.
How we ensure our content is accurate and trustworthy?
At StudySmarter, we have created a learning platform that serves millions of students. Meet
the people who work hard to deliver fact based content as well as making sure it is verified.
Content Creation Process:
Lily Hulatt is a Digital Content Specialist with over three years of experience in content strategy and curriculum design. She gained her PhD in English Literature from Durham University in 2022, taught in Durham University’s English Studies Department, and has contributed to a number of publications. Lily specialises in English Literature, English Language, History, and Philosophy.
Get to know Lily
Content Quality Monitored by:
Gabriel Freitas is an AI Engineer with a solid experience in software development, machine learning algorithms, and generative AI, including large language models’ (LLMs) applications. Graduated in Electrical Engineering at the University of São Paulo, he is currently pursuing an MSc in Computer Engineering at the University of Campinas, specializing in machine learning topics. Gabriel has a strong background in software engineering and has worked on projects involving computer vision, embedded AI, and LLM applications.
Get to know Gabriel