Learning Materials
Features
Discover
To encourage national industrial recovery, to foster fair competition, and to provide for the construction of certain useful public works, and for other purposes."
Millions of flashcards designed to help you ace your studies
Sign up for freeTitle II created which New Deal Program?
True or False:NIRA allowed industries to self regulate.
NIRA offered what protections to workers?
NIRA illegalized child labor in which industry?
True or False:NIRA remained incredibly popular during its two year run.
True or False:Unions were and still are protected because of NIRA.
Title II created which New Deal Program?
True or False:NIRA allowed industries to self regulate.
NIRA offered what protections to workers?
NIRA illegalized child labor in which industry?
True or False:NIRA remained incredibly popular during its two year run.
True or False:Unions were and still are protected because of NIRA.
Achieve better grades quicker with Premium
Geld-zurück-Garantie, wenn du durch die Prüfung fällst
Review generated flashcards
Start learning or create your own AI flashcards
Team National Industrial Recovery Act Teachers
-National Recovery Act of 19331
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt passed the National Recovery Act during his first hundred days in office. The act addressed the issues that arose during the Great Depression. It was meant to create jobs and regulate the labor industry. In reality, it didn't achieve the Roosevelt Administration's goals. Let's take a closer look at the National Industrial Recovery Act.
Before we can look at the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA), let's take a few steps back. In 1929, the Stock Market crashed, which caused the Great Depression. There are more factors at play here, but the important takeaway is that The Great Depression began in 1929. Franklin Delano Roosevelt became President in 1933 with ambitious goals to end the depression.
Roosevelt wasted no time and almost immediately acted. The president passed many acts in his first hundred days in office, including the National Recovery Act of 1933.
Fig 1: Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the President during the New Deal era. The National Industrial Recovery Act was passed within his first year as President!
In 1933, many theories were about the cause of the Great Depression. The Roosevelt Administration, like everyone else, was unsure of what exactly caused the depression, so they didn't have a definite solution for the issue. The administration appointed experts to write out the NIRA. The act was to accomplish what its title said, help American industries recover.
Just like there were many theories about the cause of the depression, there were many alternative solutions. Some believed the federal government needed to withdraw further from the economy, but the Roosevelt Administration disagreed. NIRA was supposed to regulate industries, raise wages, standardize the workweek, and protect the right to unionize.
Fig 2: NIRA Blue Eagle. The phrase "We Do Our Part" targeted the American patriotic spirit.
Roosevelt used an executive order to establish a department to oversee NIRA called the National Recovery Administration. Hugh S. Johnson was responsible for the administration. To make the NRA more popular, the Roosevelt Administration launched a campaign to popularize the act. Flyers praised it, while businesses that followed NIRA were encouraged to display a blue eagle. The blue eagle represented NRA.
Titles are different sections of an act, and NIRA had three. The graph below shows a brief breakdown of each title. The section below will go into more detail about the different sections of NIRA!
| Title | Explanation |
| Title I | Created codes for fair production that were meant to centralize the economy |
| Title II | Created the Public Work Administration |
| Title III | Made minor adjustments to previous New Deal Acts |
Title 1 of NIRA was about industrial regulation. People in business were required to create fair codes that would apply to the entire industry. These codes allowed American industries to self-regulate.
Unionization was a protected right under section 7A of Title I. Union status couldn't affect an employee's or future employment status. An employer couldn't fire employees if they joined unions or refused to join corporate unions. Employers were unable to pay employees less than minimum wage. Lastly, employees could only work 30 hours a week.
The workweek was limited to thirty hours, so employers had to hire multiple people to fill one role. For example, John was a miner who initially worked 12-hour shifts six days a week. John worked 72 hours a week. When the NIRA limited the workweek to 30 hours, John's boss had to hire two more workers to fulfill the amount of work that John initially filled.
Fig 2: Miners in Idaho
Title II of NIRA designated 3.3 billion dollars to public works projects. This created the Public Works Administration (PWA) headed by Secretary of the Interior Harold L. Ickes. This program awarded funds to different states. The states then hired private contractors to fulfill public work projects. The PWA built schools, homes, bridges, and more!
Public Work Administration and Race
The Great Depression hit African Americans the hardest. Unlike the Civilian Conservation Corps, the PWA made an active effort to employ people of color. Ickes supported civil rights and ensured that African Americans received some of the benefits of the PWA. 28 of the 60 federal housing projects conducted by the PWA were in African American communities.
Ickes spent around thirty million dollars on African American communities. The PWA also made sure that African Americans were employed through them. While many New Deal programs excluded African Americas, the PWA didn't. The New Deal was good for America but could've been better for African Americans.
Title III made minor adjustments to existing acts like the Emergency Relief Act and the Construction Act of 1932.
NIRA started incredibly popular. People were excited to unionize and have a minimum wage. Mismanagement made enthusiasm around the NIRA fade. The National Industrial Recovery Act had unforeseen consequences. The people in business in charge of creating the codes wanted incentives. They wanted guarantees that their companies would benefit from self-regulation. In the end, these codes caused prices to rise while production decreased.
Employers overlooked laws that protected unions or simply found workarounds. Unions found little to no success when they tried to fight for their rights. The National Industrial Recovery Act was unpopular among Conservatives and Liberals because it didn't meet either's expectations.
In 1935, the Supreme Court ruled that the National Industrial Recovery Act was unconstitutional in Schechter Poultry Corp. Versus the United States. The act was two years old and had two more hours before its renewal. The Roosevelt Administration didn't believe the show had enough time to develop fully, but the Supreme Court disagreed.
The National Industrial Recovery Act wasn't a complete failure. One of its most significant accomplishments, outside the other labor laws it created, was the illegalization of child labor in the textile industry. The textile industry was generally hazardous, but even more so for children. Small kids could reach areas that adults couldn't. They would send a child inside the broken machine to repair it. Many children lost fingers, hands, and other body parts. In the worst-case scenario, they lost their lives.
Fig 4: Copy of the opening page of the National Industrial Recovery Act
The National Industrial Recovery Act enacted labor laws that protected workers. While it wasn't perfect, it was a good start. The Public Work Administration continued after NIRA was voted unconstitutional. It continued to provide construction work that benefitted the nation, state, community, and individual.
Sign up for free to gain access to all our flashcards.
Is the National Industrial Recovery Act still around today?
The National Industrial Recovery Act was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in June 1935. The act is inactive today.
Was the National Industrial Recovery Act successful?
The National Industrial Recovery Act has mixed reviews. While some consider it successful because it ended child labor in the textile industry, others disagree. The act was meant to protect unions, but it didn't. It also caused a rise in prices during the Great Depression. While the act ended child labor in one industry, it was unsuccessful because it didn't accomplish its goals.
What was the purpose of the National Industrial Recovery Act?
The National Industrial Recovery Act sought to correct the issues that were created during the Great Depression. As experts had differing opinions as to the cause of the depression, they also had differing solutions. This is reflected in the act itself.
When was the National Industrial Recovery Act created?
The National Industrial Recovery Act was enacted in June 1933 and ended in 1935.
What did the National Industrial Recovery Act do?
The National Industrial Recovery Act established the Public Work Administration, gave the federal government more power over the nation's economy, and ended child labor in the textile industry. It also raised prices, making life more difficult for the average person during the Great Depression.
At StudySmarter, we have created a learning platform that serves millions of students. Meet the people who work hard to deliver fact based content as well as making sure it is verified.
Lily Hulatt is a Digital Content Specialist with over three years of experience in content strategy and curriculum design. She gained her PhD in English Literature from Durham University in 2022, taught in Durham University’s English Studies Department, and has contributed to a number of publications. Lily specialises in English Literature, English Language, History, and Philosophy.
Get to know Lily
Gabriel Freitas is an AI Engineer with a solid experience in software development, machine learning algorithms, and generative AI, including large language models’ (LLMs) applications. Graduated in Electrical Engineering at the University of São Paulo, he is currently pursuing an MSc in Computer Engineering at the University of Campinas, specializing in machine learning topics. Gabriel has a strong background in software engineering and has worked on projects involving computer vision, embedded AI, and LLM applications.
Get to know Gabriel
Explanations 
Flashcards 
StudySmarter AI 
Notes 
Study Plans 
Study Sets 
Exams 
Magazine 
Find a job 
Mobile App