Teapot Dome Scandal: Definition
The Teapot Dome scandal was an episode that occurred over the leasing of government-owned oil reserves to oil barons with ties to the Secretary of the Interior. Money changed hands within President Warren Harding’s administration, as secret deals were arranged between oil companies and the government. The scandal resulted in mass outrage and an investigation into the corruption by the United States Senate.
Teapot Dome Scandal: Summary
Fig.1 - Harry Sinclair
The Teapot Dome scandal was an instance of major United States governmental corruption in the early 1920s. The scandal involved a secret deal to lease government-owned naval oil reserves to two oil barons, Edward Doheny and Harry Sinclair. One of the reserves was the Teapot Dome oil reserve in Wyoming, for which the scandal was named.
The previous presidential administration, headed by Woodrow Wilson, had declined all requests for leases of these reserves. In 1921, after the oil industry lobbied to elect a Republican president, Warren G Harding, who would be sympathetic to their cause, Doheny and Sinclair worked with the new Secretary of the Interior, Albert Fall, to make the deal.
Fig.2 - Albert Fall
One of the first things Fall did was encourage President Warren G Harding to transfer authority over the oil reserves from the US Navy to the Department of the Interior. Fall had been hoping that he would eventually be given a lucrative job in the oil industry. This transfer of oversight allowed Fall to help Doheny and Sinclair secure leases to the naval oil reserves.
Fall had hoped to keep the deal from becoming public knowledge, but The Wall Street Journal published a front-page story in 1922, containing leaked information about Teapot Dome. There was immediate backlash as other oil companies expressed outrage over the lack of competitive bidding.
There was also anger among Congress, but President Harding insisted that he had seen Fall’s plan and supported it completely. The Senate opened an investigation into the scandal in 1922. Fall was fined and sentenced to a year in prison.
Sinclair refused to answer the Senate's questions, which resulted in the Supreme Court case of Sinclair vs the United States, to determine whether or not the Senate had the authority to conduct a full investigation. The Supreme Court found against Sinclair, and he spent over half a year in prison for contempt of court. Doheny was acquitted of bribery charges. President Harding died of a heart attack or stroke in 1923 before he could see the outcome of the investigation.
Teapot Dome Scandal: Dates
Date | Event |
1921 | Harding transferred oversight of naval oil reserve lands from the US Navy to the Department of the Interior |
1921-1922 | Interior Secretary Albert Bacon Fall secretly sold drilling rights for those sites to Harry Sinclair of Mammoth Oil and Edward Doheny of the Pan American Petroleum Company |
April 14, 1922 | The Wall Street Journal broke the story of the deal |
April 15, 1922 | Democratic Senator John Kendrick submitted a resolution to open an investigation by the Senate |
January, 1923 | Fall resigned as Interior Secretary |
August 2, 1923 | Warren Harding died, either of a heart attack or stroke |
October, 1923 | The Senate investigation into corruption began. |
1927 | The US government canceled Sinclair and Doheny’s leases to the land. |
1929 | The Greystone Murder-Suicide: Ned Doheny, jr., was shot and killed by Hugh Plunkett, who then killed himself. Historians suspect that this was due to a fear of legal retribution for their role in the scandal. |
October, 1929 | Fall was convicted by the Senate of accepting a bribe, and was fined $100,000, and sentenced to a year in prison. However, the fine was eventually waived as Fall had lost all his money, and his sentence was shortened due to his failing health. |
1929 | Sinclair vs United States determined that congress has the ability to conduct full investigations and require answers from defendants |
1929 | Sinclair spent 6.5 months in prison for contempt of the court |
1944 | Fall died of illness. |
Teapot Dome Scandal: Following the Money
Harding had received funding from oil companies to fuel his presidential campaign. Sinclair had donated $1,000,000 to that campaign. Upon his election, Doheny offered Hardy his luxury yacht to take on a personal cruise.
While it may raise questions of corporate influence, Harding’s cozy relationship with the oil barons wasn’t the focus of the Senate’s investigation. This is a trail of the bribes directly tied to the Teapot Dome scandal:
Item | Source | Recipient |
$100,000 interest-free unrepaid loan | Doheny, delivered in secret by his son Ned and Hugh Plunkett | Fall |
$1,000,000 | Sinclair | Denver Post, in exchange for refraining to publish the damning findings of their investigations into the scandal |
$300,000 in Liberty Bonds | Sinclair | Fall |
Large herd of cattle | Sinclair | Fall |
Teapot Dome Scandal President
Fig.3 - President Warren G. Harding
- Warren G. Harding was President of the United States from 1921 until his death in 1923
- Harding was a Republican, born in Ohio in 1865
- Harding campaigned for the President on the slogan: “Less government in business and more business in government”
- Harding had little success in college and attempted several vocations before buying a local paper in 1884
- He eventually married Florence Kling De Wolfe, who played a major role in transforming the paper into a successful business
This allowed him to enter Republican politics, and he was able to rise through the ranks
He is not considered to have been particularly intelligent, but his “presidential” good looks helped to make up for what he lacked
Teapot Dome Scandal: Significance
The oil reserves were ultimately returned to the US Navy, and the government recovered millions of dollars from both Doheny and Sinclair. Nonetheless, the scandal caused lasting distrust in the government. Citizens had concerns about the influence of corporations on government action and policy, and corporations had concerns about bribery and the preferential treatment of certain companies over others.
Corporate influence on democratic government remains a matter of public discourse today. Until it was largely eclipsed in the public memory by the Watergate scandal, the Teapot Dome Scandal was shorthand for government corruption and served as a demonstration of the need for government transparency.
Teapot Dome Scandal: Historiography
Teapot Dome was one of the largest corruption scandals in US history. Although it was the first, for instance the Grant administration was known for scandal, it became a benchmark for decades. Later events such as Watergate were compared to it. It's greatest similarity though may be to the Enron ordeal of the early 2000s.
Both situations involved the nexus of money, oil, and big government. The suicide of Enron executive Cliff Baxter was similar to that of Jess Smith, who was seen as a figure of corruption. He was in cahoots with the Attorney General in Harding's administration but was not an official government employee. This discrepancy gave rise to a multitude of conspiracy theories, as did the suicide of Baxter.
Tea Pot Dome Scandal - Key takeaways
The Teapot Dome scandal was a corrupt deal to lease government-owned oil reserves in Wyoming and California. The scandal is named for the Wyoming reserve.
In 1921, President Warren Harding's Secretary of the Minister, Albert Fall, encouraged Harding to transfer control of the naval reserves to the Department of the Interior.
Oil barons Edward Doheny and Harry Sinclair made a secret deal with Albert Fall to lease the reserves. Fall received bribes for the deal.
In 1922, The Wall Street Journal published an exposé on the deal, which led to a long investigation by the Senate.
How we ensure our content is accurate and trustworthy?
At StudySmarter, we have created a learning platform that serves millions of students. Meet
the people who work hard to deliver fact based content as well as making sure it is verified.
Content Creation Process:
Lily Hulatt is a Digital Content Specialist with over three years of experience in content strategy and curriculum design. She gained her PhD in English Literature from Durham University in 2022, taught in Durham University’s English Studies Department, and has contributed to a number of publications. Lily specialises in English Literature, English Language, History, and Philosophy.
Get to know Lily
Content Quality Monitored by:
Gabriel Freitas is an AI Engineer with a solid experience in software development, machine learning algorithms, and generative AI, including large language models’ (LLMs) applications. Graduated in Electrical Engineering at the University of São Paulo, he is currently pursuing an MSc in Computer Engineering at the University of Campinas, specializing in machine learning topics. Gabriel has a strong background in software engineering and has worked on projects involving computer vision, embedded AI, and LLM applications.
Get to know Gabriel