The Nuremberg Trials

World War II ended in 1945, but the world was coming to realize the atrocities committed by the leaders and members of the German Nazi party. The Allied powers, consisting of the US, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union, decided that the leaders of Nazi Germany had to be held accountable for their actions during the War. 

Get started

Millions of flashcards designed to help you ace your studies

Sign up for free

Achieve better grades quicker with Premium

PREMIUM
Karteikarten Spaced Repetition Lernsets AI-Tools Probeklausuren Lernplan Erklärungen Karteikarten Spaced Repetition Lernsets AI-Tools Probeklausuren Lernplan Erklärungen
Kostenlos testen

Geld-zurück-Garantie, wenn du durch die Prüfung fällst

Review generated flashcards

Sign up for free
You have reached the daily AI limit

Start learning or create your own AI flashcards

StudySmarter Editorial Team

Team The Nuremberg Trials Teachers

  • 9 minutes reading time
  • Checked by StudySmarter Editorial Team
Save Article Save Article
Contents
Contents

Jump to a key chapter

    The Allied created a specific court system in which German leaders accused of war crimes were to be tried in a court of law. Between 1945 and 1949, a series of trials headed by an international group formed by the Allied powers of the US, Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union, aimed to hold German leaders accountable for their actions. These became known as the Nuremberg Trials.

    The Nuremberg Trials Definition

    The Nuremberg Trials took place between 1945 to 1949. The Trails were led by the Allied powers of France, Great Britain, the Soviet Union, and the US, who each appointed a representative to the prosecuting team.

    The defendants of the Nuremberg Trials were the leaders of Nazi Germany and those who carried out war crimes during World War II. Many of those on trial were directly involved with the Holocaust.

    The Nuremberg Trials Overview

    The celebration of the end of World War II on May 8, 1945, came with the atrocities of the Nazi reign in Germany coming to light, including genocide and persecution of the Jewish people, which became known as the Holocaust.

    The Allied powers turned their attention to the future of the Axis powers, mainly Germany, whose actions had culminated in mass destruction and genocide. Shortly after, Allied leaders from the US, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union convened at the Potsdam Conference on July 17, 1945. Here they decided that the war crimes committed by Nazi leaders could not go unpunished, and any reference to the party should be removed. They called this process denazification,

    genocide

    the systematic murder of a specific group of people; the term was first used to describe the Holocaust during World War II

    denazification

    the Allied attempt to rid Germany of the Nazi party after the War ended

    Before this, there were no concrete processes for international courts to try leaders of another country in a court of law for war crimes. The Allied powers came to agreements to set up the International Military Tribunal to guide the trials and guidelines on how to proceed with a fair trial of the Germans.

    The Trials are generally agreed to have two rounds: the first one being led by the International Military Tribunal and the second one being led by the American Military Tribunal.

    Nuremberg, a city in the German state of Bavaria, was chosen not only for its convenient Palace of Justice, which had withstood the violence of the War. The town had been known for holding Nazi propaganda rallies before the War. Holding the trials in the city would be symbolic of the end of the reign of Nazi Germany.

    The Nuremberg Trials The Palace of Justice StudySmarterThe Palace of Justice in Nuremberg.

    The Nuremberg Trials summary

    Before the first of the Nuremberg Trials began, the Allied leaders had to do a lot of background work to organize international trials.

    Two years before, in 1943, the leaders of the Allied powers signed the Moscow Declaration of German Atrocities, stating that when the War ended, the leaders of Nazi Germany would be tried for their crimes. The Moscow Declaration was implemented in August 1945 when the Allied forces forged and signed the London Charter and Agreement, which created a new branch of their alliance called the International Military Tribunal (IMT).

    Each country, the US, Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union, appointed a representative to the IMT. The London Charter and Agreement set up a format for the trials, as well as outlining three crimes the majority of defendants would be accused of:

    • crimes against peace
    • war crimes
    • crimes against humanity

    The Nuremberg Trials. German defendants on trial in November 1945 StudySmarterGerman defendants were on trial in November 1945.

    Trial of Major War Criminals

    The Trail of Major War Criminals began on November 20, 1945, and ended on October 1, 1946. The Allies elected British Justice Geoffrey Lawrence to preside over the trials of 22 German officials.

    The officials being tried were considered Major War Criminals, as they were leaders within the Nazi party. They were considered Major War Criminals because their crimes were not specific to a particular place and affected the vast population instead of a particular group or person.

    During the Major War Criminal trials, crimes against humanity were also used in a court of law for the first time.

    Crimes against humanity

    is defined by the International Military Tribunal as: "murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation...persecutions on political racial or religious grounds."

    The Trials stretched on for almost a year, and the jurists reviewed an incredible amount of evidence. Twelve defendants were sentenced to death, three were sentenced to life in prison, and four were sent to prison. Three were found not guilty.

    Several leaders of Nazi Germany committed suicide before they could stand trial for their actions. Others fled the country, settling in countries such as Argentina.

    American Role in the Nuremberg Trials

    After the Trial of Major Criminals came to a close, the control of the Nuremberg Trials was left to American jurisdiction. The last trial was a joint effort with the IMT in December 1946. While the decisions were in the hands of the Americans, the trials were still held in the Palace of Justice in Germany. There they had twelve more trials of Nazi Germany leaders accused of war crimes. These Trials were known as the Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings.

    Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings

    The Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings were led by Associate Supreme Court Justice Robert H Jackson, who was also the leader of the making of the London Charter. Other American judges during the Trials were: Francis Biddle, John J Parker, and Edward Francis Carter.

    The Nuremberg Trials American administrators from the US Army organizing evidence for the Nuremberg Trials StudySmarterAmerican administrators from the US Army organizing evidence for the Nuremberg Trials.

    The 12 American-led trials began on December 9, 1946. These trials differed from the Trials of Major War Criminals because they mainly focused on crimes committed against a specific individual or group of people. The Subsequent Nuremberg Proceedings included, but were not limited to:

    • Trials for 23 Doctors who committed medical crimes against prisoners
    • Trials of German businesses, like IG-Farben, who had used slave labor from concentration camps to produce goods
    • Hostages Trials, where German military leaders committed war crimes during occupation of other countries

    Nuremberg Trials Controversy

    Many felt that the Nuremberg trials were unfair and even referred to as the "lynching party" by Supreme Court Justice Harlan Stone. They were against the trials because those on trial were accused of crimes that technically did not exist as laws before the War. The German prisoners complained that their sentencing and imprisonment were an application of ex-post facto law.

    While the US Supreme Court ceded that they did not have official jurisdiction over Germany, they solidified the sentences. However, in 1951, the American High Commissioner for Occupied Germany (HICOG), John McCloy, decided to commute the sentences of those sentenced in the US-led trials.

    Ex-post facto

    when a law is applied to a crime that was legal or not explicitly illegal when it was committed

    Commute

    to reduce the amount of time a person spends in jail serving time for a crime

    The Nuremberg Trials Significance

    The Nuremberg Trials were the first time multiple countries came together in a court of law and set an important precedent for future international statutes and relationships. Before Nuremberg, it was not assumed that leaders in the military or government could be individually held accountable for their actions.

    There was a need for instantaneous translation since representatives from many countries attended the trials. Everything in the trials was translated into English, French, German, and Russian.

    American in the Nuremberg Trials / The Signing of the Geneva Convention / StudySmarterThe signing of the Geneva Convention.1

    The trials set a precedent that civilians would be protected by international law, and no one, not even leaders of countries, is exempt from being convicted of crimes against humanity. Both military and political leaders could be put on trial and held accountable for their actions during wartime.

    While the trials were groundbreaking, they paved the way for the United Nations Genocide Convention of 1948 and the Geneva Convention on the Laws and Customs of War in 1949. The attempt to bring German Nazi war criminals continued into the 21st century.

    Beyond the direct implications of World War II, the laws put into place during the Nuremberg Trials were applied to other events in the 20th century, such as the genocide in Rwanda. The Trials changed the way the world viewed the effects of War.

    America in the Nuremberg Trials - Key takeaways

    • The Nuremberg Trials were split into two phases: the IMT in charge of the first and the US taking control of the second.
    • The Allied powers created the International Military Tribunal: the US, Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union.
    • The trials were controversial because they were seen as an ex-post facto law application.
    • The Nuremberg Trials outlined the long-lasting, impactful idea of international laws that governed War.

    References

    1. Geneva Conventions - signing in 1949 (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geneva_Conventions_-_signing_in_1949.jpg) by British Red Cross (https://www.flickr.com/people/28884294@N04) is licensed by CC BY 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en)
    Learn faster with the 0 flashcards about The Nuremberg Trials

    Sign up for free to gain access to all our flashcards.

    The Nuremberg Trials
    Frequently Asked Questions about The Nuremberg Trials

    Why did the US stop the Nuremberg trials?

    The US stopped the Nuremberg Trials after they completed trying those they knew had committed crimes. Other reasons may include turning their attention to the burgeoning Cold War.

    Who were the main people in the Nuremberg trials?

    The main players in the Nuremberg Trials were the representatives chosen from each Allied country, and the defendants from defeated Germany.

    Who were the defendants at the Nuremberg trials?

    The defendants of the Nuremberg trials were German war officials.

    Who represented the US at the Nuremberg trials?

    The US was represented by Associate Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson.


    Save Article

    Discover learning materials with the free StudySmarter app

    Sign up for free
    1
    About StudySmarter

    StudySmarter is a globally recognized educational technology company, offering a holistic learning platform designed for students of all ages and educational levels. Our platform provides learning support for a wide range of subjects, including STEM, Social Sciences, and Languages and also helps students to successfully master various tests and exams worldwide, such as GCSE, A Level, SAT, ACT, Abitur, and more. We offer an extensive library of learning materials, including interactive flashcards, comprehensive textbook solutions, and detailed explanations. The cutting-edge technology and tools we provide help students create their own learning materials. StudySmarter’s content is not only expert-verified but also regularly updated to ensure accuracy and relevance.

    Learn more
    StudySmarter Editorial Team

    Team History Teachers

    • 9 minutes reading time
    • Checked by StudySmarter Editorial Team
    Save Explanation Save Explanation

    Study anywhere. Anytime.Across all devices.

    Sign-up for free

    Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.

    Join over 22 million students in learning with our StudySmarter App

    The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place

    • Flashcards & Quizzes
    • AI Study Assistant
    • Study Planner
    • Mock-Exams
    • Smart Note-Taking
    Join over 22 million students in learning with our StudySmarter App
    Sign up with Email