Cultural Landscapes

Cultural Landscape Definition in Geography

"Cultural landscape" is a central concept in cultural geography.

Characteristics of the Cultural Landscape

Boundaries and characteristics of a landscape are subjective. One area can be designated as different types of cultural landscape.

There are nearly limitless ways to name, categorize, and delimit cultural landscapes. Below are some universal characteristics.

Area with Imprint of Human Culture

This can be almost anywhere, even if people don't live there.

Fig. 1 - Satellite photo shows the Grasberg Mine that has excavated a giant hole in New Guinea's tallest mountain, Puncak Jaya, a 16,024-foot peak sacred to Indigenous groups who struggled against Freeport McMoran, the company responsible for the damage

Because people inhabit most of the planet's land surface, what AREN'T cultural landscapes, in the broadest sense?

• Most of Antarctica, where permanent human presence has never been felt (though scientific base areas are cultural landscapes).

• Arctic areas: humans have inhabited, albeit sometimes intermittently, all places but ice sheets on Greenland and nearby islands, so few landscapes here are natural.

• Even the remotest parts of Siberia, the Sahara, the Australian deserts, and the Amazon bear imprints of human cultures, and nearly every remote oceanic island has a research station, weather station, military outpost, or former whaling or sealing camp.

Thus "cultural landscape" signifies ANY landscape on Earth outside Antarctica, as long as you recognize present or detectable past signs of humans there.

Detectable by Senses or Emotions

Human cultural artifacts can be detected by at least one of the five senses and/or subjective dimensions such as emotions (landscapes of fear or memory, for example). This is important! In previous times, landscapes were characterized solely as visual artifacts, a holdover from the 17th-century Dutch landschap paintings that are at the origin of the concept. Now, a cultural landscape may be recognizable by its smells, tastes, sounds, and tactile sensations, not just its visual aspects.

Location + People = Sense of Place

What we are getting at is this. Because all humans possess culture, the very act of dwelling in a location, whether for a season or permanently, turns that location into a place in a cultural landscape. It gives the location a sense of place. People create geographic meaning, whether by farming, building a shack, naming local landmarks, or telling stories about mountains that turn into the basis of their religion.

Cultural landscapes are networks comprised of places (locations with meanings) and the ways they interconnect (streets, paths, roads, etc.). Where people haven't been and haven't inhabited, whether ice caps or other planets, cultural landscapes don't exist. But on Earth, the essential human geographical activity is making places and landscapes.

Text and Palimpsest

Cultural landscapes, whether they are US suburbs or sacred groves in Benin, have meaning and therefore they can be "read" as what geographers call text. Meanings vary; a single landscape can be read in many different ways. A landscape read by someone who wishes to make a profit has a quite different interpretation than its reading as a place to be preserved in perpetuity, for example.

Fig. 2 - Galen's palimpsest, an 11th-century AD text written over a partially erased 9th-century text

Most cultural landscapes function as palimpsests. When a new occupier moves in, the erasure of previous meanings, whether intentional or not, is usually incomplete. Therefore, what you get is like those ancient manuscripts that were erased and written over, again and again. With special tools, historians can detect some of what was erased. In a cultural landscape, geographers can also find traces of those older cultural texts, even if these are buried in the ground (literally), or in place names, like the way the US is filled with Indigenous burial sites and toponyms in places where Indigenous people no longer live.

Importance of Cultural Landscape

Some cultural landscapes are more important than others, and many types of cultural landscapes are worth saving. After all, cultural landscapes are the imprint of human culture on the world. Geographers condone neither the destruction of cultural landscapes nor the creation of new, generic landscapes on top of older, more nuanced and important landscapes. Why is this?

Cultural landscapes are the cradle of human culture. All cultures, in a way, have their "sacred mountains," whether these are more like Notre Dame de Paris or Gettysburg Battlefield. Without a landscape to contain cultural memory, it can exist only in written or recorded texts.

Destroying a sacred or historical landscape, not to mention the living landscape of a vernacular culture, to make way for a shopping mall, replaces one landscape with another. It is hard to argue that a shopping mall is anything other than a commercial and generic creation that can be placed anywhere. Sacred, historic, and vernacular landscapes, however, are often irreplaceable.

Destroying cultural monuments and other signs of a current or past culture on purpose may be an attempt to remove evidence of culture and often happens in genocides, where the intent is to eliminate attachment, memory, and any claims to ownership on behalf of a persecuted culture. Sometimes, this is a necessary step, if the culture whose monuments are being destroyed was the persecutor (think: Nazi Germany), but in general, intentional erasure of cultural landscape happens because new occupiers devalue the imprint of previous inhabitants, unless these were their ancestors.

Categories of Cultural Landscapes

The US National Parks Service and the United Nations protect cultural landscapes. Their definitions are somewhat more narrow than those of cultural geographers, as they are not concerned with generic commercial landscapes such as those characterizing the Galactic City (for example). They are justifiably concerned with unique and outstanding places integral to cultural history, preservation, and connection to nature, whether at the level of a country or a local region or culture.

You may have heard of UNESCO World Heritage Sites, for example. For agencies like the NPS and UNESCO, the recognition of cultural landscapes has become increasingly important. The NPS lists Historic Designed Landscapes, Historic Sites, Historic Vernacular Landscapes, and Ethnographic Landscapes as its four types.²

Examples of Cultural Landscapes

Globalization = homogeneity: everywhere is starting to look like everywhere else! Corporations reproduce the same forms everywhere (A Burger King is a Burger King is a Burger King), and dominant cultures like the US are copied everywhere. So does this mean that eventually we will end up with a single global cultural landscape? Opinions differ.

The US Fast-Food Restaurant

For many, a McDonald's or Burger King is the ultimate generic, cookie-cutter landscape. It IS a cultural landscape, but is there only one? Arguably, there are actually many. While the McDonalds' across Ohio are all probably pretty similar, particularly those at the Interstate exits, what about the McDonalds' in Brazil...or Japan...or Nigeria? What you may see in these is familiar, but the culture of the people who give meaning to them is of course distinct from Ohio.

This is how all cultural forms change when they are in distinct locations. With thousands of cultures in the world, each one creating and maintaining distinct cultural landscapes, it is inevitable that even the most generic cultural forms, once they diffuse, will become heterogeneous.

The Pyramids of Giza

The meanings given by the builders to the Great Pyramid and its two neighbors were lost millennia ago. This has not stopped over 200 generations from assigning the pyramids their own meanings. We use this obvious example to point out how the past remains present as long as it is preserved and somehow visible or otherwise sense-able. Even when cultures evolve and pass away, their landscapes remain as part of the heritage of humanity.

The Amazon Rainforest...or Garden?

Only in recent years has the scope and density of human habitation in the Amazon River basin over the last 10,000 years been fully appreciated.

Fig. 3 - The Amazon Rainforest is largely in Brazil and comprises the NW part of the country: look how much of it is utilized as Indian territory; the rest may also be used, or has been in the past, and is thus also cultural landscape

The Amazon's vast forests were cast as "empty" by those who wanted to claim them, or who assumed, like the British in Australia, that early habitation had been inconsequential. It wasn't.

In the 16th century AD, Europeans who sailed the Amazon River did not see a vast forest. They saw towns and cities and vast agricultural land. As across most of the Americas, forests grew back after 90% or more of the human population died of disease. Those who remained continued to practice slash and burn agriculture, protecting certain plants and growing others on purpose. This, combined with the remaining forest gardens from the civilizations that had disappeared, meant that indeed, the Amazon was a type of garden, if extremely grown over.

Most of it, today, is the current or former cultural territory of an Indigenous group, whether they have legal rights to it or not. Where they do, it may not be used for farming except once every few decades, but is still part of their cultural landscape, used for fishing, hunting, and gathering.