Explanations 
Flashcards 
StudySmarter AI 
Notes 
Study Plans 
Study Sets 
Exams 
Magazine 
Find a job 
Mobile App 
Jump to a key chapter
Understanding Schengen Integration
The concept of Schengen Integration refers to an area where countries essentially abolish their internal borders, allowing free and unrestricted movement of people, goods, services, and capital. This common region is known as the Schengen Zone, and it currently comprises 26 European countries that have decided to relieve their mutual frontiers.
Schengen Integration: The process that led to the creation of Europe's Schengen Area, where internal border checks have largely been abolished. It is named after the 1985 Schengen Agreement signed in Schengen, Luxembourg.
The history of Schengen integration
The history of Schengen Integration is quite interesting and reflects the evolving unity among European countries after decades of conflict. It started as a bold initiative by five countries and has expanded over time, profoundly impacting how people live, work, and travel across Europe.
Early beginnings and the establishment of Schengen Zone
The seed of the Schengen Integration was sowed in 1985 when five EU member states - Belgium, Germany, France, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands - gathered in the tiny Luxembourg village of Schengen to sign a groundbreaking agreement. This Schengen Agreement, as it came to be known, aimed to gradually abolish checks at their shared borders and facilitate unrestricted movement of people.
For instance, a person residing in Luxembourg can freely travel to Germany for work, cross into Belgium for lunch, and go to France for a weekend sightseeing, all without requiring a passport or undergoing border checks. This is made possible because of these countries being part of the Schengen Zone.
Major milestones in the evolution of Schengen integration
Over the years, the Schengen Area has seen a number of major milestones that marked its continuous evolution. Firstly, the community grew in size as more countries progressively signed the Schengen Agreement and abolished their internal borders. Currently, the Schengen Area consists of 26 countries, including 22 out of the 27 EU member states plus four non-EU countries.
- 1990 - Implementation Convention: The detailed rules and regulations to implement the Schengen Agreement were adopted.
- 1995 - End of Internal Borders: The internal border checks between Belgium, Germany, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain were eliminated.
- 2007 - Schengen Information System II (SIS II) was introduced: This is a large-scale database supporting external border control and law enforcement cooperation in the Schengen Area.
An essential aspect of Schengen integration was the establishment of the Schengen Information System (SIS), which allows police forces and border guards from different Schengen countries to cooperatively manage security without internal border checks. SIS stores data such as stolen property, missing persons, and people who may need to be put under surveillance.
Countries Part of the Schengen Area
The Schengen Area, embracing the concept of unrestricted movement, encompasses a majority of European countries - a total of 26. This includes most of the EU countries, along with a handful of non-EU ones. Deepening your knowledge of these countries offers a real-world understanding of the vast scale and impact of the Schengen Integration.
Founding Members and Their Contribution to Schengen Integration
The founding members of the Schengen Area, known as the Schengen States, were five Western European countries: France, Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands. The contribution of these countries to the Schengen Integration goes beyond merely signing the initial agreement.
By boldly initiating the concept of abolishing internal barriers, they set the groundwork for a unique kind of integration that would redefine the way countries interact and cooperate. They recognized the potential of seamless travel for fostering stronger economic, social, and cultural connections, thus driving the overall development and unity of the region. Furthermore, they established the unprecedented principle of trust – agreeing to rely on one another's capabilities in managing external borders.
This innovative system started with these five countries but envisioning its effectiveness, many others joined arraying a broad network of interconnected nations functioning as a single unit in terms of border control and management.
Member States That Recently Joined the Schengen Area
The Schengen Area saw its most recent expansion in 2007 when nine new countries joined the existing group. These include Central and Eastern European countries such as Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, and Malta. Their inclusion signified a significant step towards integrating newer EU members into the free movement zone and marked the largest single enlargement of the Schengen Area.
| Poland | 2007 |
| Slovakia | 2007 |
| Hungary | 2007 |
| Slovenia | 2007 |
| Czech Republic | 2007 |
| Latvia | 2007 |
| Estonia | 2007 |
| Lithuania | 2007 |
| Malta | 2007 |
Future Prospects: Potential New Members
As of now, there are four EU member states that are not yet part of the Schengen Zone – Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, and Cyprus. These countries, however, are legally obliged to join the area in the future. Their accession would further expand the geographical reach of the Schengen Integration, thereby adding to the benefits and challenges it brings.
Upon their joining, the Schengen Area would encompass virtually all of the EU territory, further consolidating the EU's aspiration for a united Europe, where people can freely move without being hindered by internal borders. Also, their addition would enhance the collective responsibility, solidarity, and cooperation among Schengen members in managing the area's external borders.
However, the inclusion of these potential new members is contingent upon meeting certain requirements, mainly related to securing external borders, ensuring privacy and data protection standards, and implementing the Schengen rules effectively.
The Law and Schengen Integration
It is paramount to understand the legal side of Schengen integration, which is rooted in various agreements and guided by specified laws. These laws have shaped the functionalities of the Schengen Area. Moreover, several court cases have also influenced Schengen law, contributing to today's implementation of Schengen integration.
Legal Principles of Schengen Integration
The Schengen Integration, bringing together 26 different nations with their unique laws and regulations, functions based on shared legal principles that comprise the 'Schengen acquis'. The Schengen acquis is a set of rules and legislation, integrated into European Union law, that defines the operation of the Schengen Agreement.
Schengen acquis: The collection of laws, regulations, international agreements, and court decisions, which compose the legal basis of the Schengen Area.
For a transparent understanding, let's discuss these primary legal principles governing the Schengen Integration:
- Abolition of Internal Borders: The cornerstone of the Schengen Integration, this principle allows for the free movement of people within the Schengen Area without internal border checks.
- Common Visa Policy: This principle establishes uniform Schengen visas for short-stays, airport transit visas and transit visas for connections in the Schengen Area.
- Police and Judicial Cooperation: This principle ensures that law enforcement and judicial authorities work together across borders to maintain security and combat crime.
- Protection of External Borders: This principle states that Schengen member countries must apply strict controls at their external borders, following the shared Schengen Borders Code.
- Shared Responsibility: This principle imposes collective responsibility on Schengen countries to protect the Area's external borders and handle asylum applications.
The Common European Asylum System (CEAS), introduced as an element of the EU's policy, is also a significant aspect of the Schengen law. The CEAS sets out minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers, procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, and criteria for determining the Member State responsible for asylum seekers. Improvement of CEAS has been a recurring subject in the broader conversation about the future of Schengen integration.
Important Court Cases That Shaped the Schengen Law
A motley of court cases over the years have shaped Schengen law, providing critical interpretations and directions for its various aspects. Some landmark cases served as turning points for setting new legal precedents, thereby deeply influencing future implementations and interpretations of Schengen rules.
Among these, a significant precedent was set in the 2006 European Court of Justice case involving Parliament v. Council (Case C-540/03), which established that legal measures related to visas, asylum, immigration, and other policies affecting free movement of persons are part of the Schengen acquis. This decision was crucial in affirming the European Parliament's legislative role and ensuring enhanced democratic oversight in Schengen matters.
Current Legal Challenges to the Schengen Integration
The Schengen Integration faces several legal challenges that impact its operation and future expansion. These challenges are shaped by the evolving dynamics in the EU and broader global context. Recognising these issues is key to understanding the complexities surrounding the Schengen Integration.
One of the primary challenges is related to managing the Area's external borders. While the shared responsibility principle obliges all Schengen countries to secure these borders, their control and protection continue to pose issues, particularly due to variations in border management practices among countries.
For example, Greece has been heavily criticised for its management of the external borders. Its geographic location exposes it to significant pressure from irregular migration via the Mediterranean Sea, but its handling of the situation has raised concerns about its compliance with the Schengen Borders Code and its overall capacity to secure the area's external borders.
Another legal challenge revolves around the Schengen Area's response to the so-called refugee crisis. The integration is grappling with the conflicting demands of offering protection to those in need while maintaining its commitment to free movement.
At national levels, there have been increasing instances of Schengen countries reinstating temporary internal border checks in response to perceived threats, such as the movements of irregular migrants or security concerns. Such actions, though permitted under Schengen law under extraordinary circumstances, have attracted criticism for stifling the integration's spirit.
The Schengen Integration, while offering immense benefits, continues to face legal challenges that must be addressed to ensure its sustained viability and relevance.
Implementation of Schengen Area
Implementing the Schengen Area has been a substantial undertaking involving numerous steps and considerations. These have encompassed tangible actions, such as setting up infrastructure at border points, as well as administrative tasks like developing common policies and updating legislation to facilitate the operation of the Schengen Area.
Steps and Considerations in the Implementation of Schengen Area
The implementation of the Schengen Area has followed a structured process, guided by key considerations, to translate its principles into practice. Let's delve more deeply into this systematic approach.
One of the initial steps in implementing the Schengen Area was formulating the Schengen Agreement and the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement (CISA). These foundational legal texts provided the basis for eliminating internal border checks and establishing a common visa policy, among other things.
Next, member states had to adapt their national legislation to align with the Schengen acquis. This involved changes to their national laws regarding border controls, visas, immigration, and police and judicial cooperation.
Schengen acquis: The body of rules, legislation, and agreements that form the legal basis of the Schengen Area.
The place where the Schengen acquis hit the road was at the border points. Here, the member countries had to install infrastructure to facilitate the new border arrangements, including border crossing points at the external borders, equipped with the necessary facilities for carrying out border checks in line with the Schengen Borders Code.
Member countries also had to train their border guards in new procedures and carry out necessary modifications in their passport and visa-issuing processes.
A critical aspect of implementing the Schengen Area has been enforcing a common visa policy. This involved the introduction of the uniform Schengen visa, which allows non-EU nationals to travel freely within the whole area.
Finally, a considerable part of the Schengen implementation involved setting up systems to facilitate cooperation between law enforcement authorities in different countries. These systems include the Schengen Information System (SIS) and the Visa Information System (VIS).
The implementation of the Schengen Area is a dynamic process that involves continuous evaluation and adaptation. It regularly navigates new challenges, such as the integration of new member states, technological advancements, changing migration trends, and evolving security threats, among others.
Role of European Institutions in the Execution of Schengen Laws
European institutions play a pivotal role in the execution of Schengen laws, ensuring the proper functioning of the Schengen Area.
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union are involved in the legislative process. They adopt laws and regulations that form part of the Schengen acquis, which are then implemented by the member countries.
For instance, the Schengen Borders Code, a pivotal piece of legislation that provides the common rules governing the management of the external borders, was adopted by the Parliament and the Council.
The European Commission oversees the application of Schengen laws. It ensures that member countries comply with their obligations, checks that they correctly apply the Schengen rules, and can take infringement proceedings against states that fail to do so.
The European Court of Justice (ECJ), on the other hand, interprets Schengen laws and ensures their equal application across all member states. It can make binding rulings on disputes related to Schengen rules and delivers judgments in cases that can shape Schengen law.
In the previously mentioned case of Parliament v. Council (Case C-540/03), the ECJ affirmed the European Parliament’s co-decision power over legal acts concerning visas, asylum, immigration, and other policies connected to the free movement of persons. This landmark judgement was a significant step forward in the European integration process.
In addition to these bodies, various agencies also play a critical role in executing Schengen laws. These include Frontex, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, which helps member states in managing their external borders; and eu-LISA, which operates the large-scale IT systems used in the Schengen Area, such as the SIS.
Overall, the execution of Schengen laws relies heavily on the contributions of various European institutions, each playing its part to ensure the smooth functioning of the Schengen Area.
Impact of Schengen Integration on International Law
Undeniably, the Schengen Integration has far-reaching implications on international law beyond the borders of the Schengen Area. This extends not only to their immediate non-member neighbours but also holds a global significance as it influences international norms and procedures related to border controls, visas, and migration.
Ramifications of Schengen Law on Non-Member States
Despite being a regional arrangement, the Schengen Integration affects non-member states in various ways, particularly due to its common visa policy and shared external border control rules.
A major element in this regard is the introduction of the unified Schengen visa, which allows non-EU nationals to travel within all the member countries. While simplifying travel for visa holders, it places a responsibility on non-member countries to comply with the Schengen visa requirements.
Schengen visa: A short-stay visa that allows its holder to travel and stay in the Schengen Area for up to 90 days in any 180-day period.
For instance, if a non-member country's citizens want to travel to any of the Schengen countries, they must first meet the Schengen visa requirements, including having valid travel documents, justifying the purpose and conditions of the planned stay, and having sufficient financial means for their stay and return.
Secondarily, the Schengen Integration impacts non-member states through its shared external border controls. As these controls are based on common rules and standards – contained in the Schengen Borders Code – for regulating entry into the Schengen Area, they affect how third countries interact with Schengen member states at their shared borders.
One of the key elements of the Schengen Borders Code is the entry-exit system, which records exit and entry data for third-country nationals crossing the external borders of the Schengen states. Implemented in accordance with the Smart Borders Package, this system equips Schengen countries to better manage their borders, enhancing both migration and border control management.
Schengen Integration and Its Global Legal Influence
Beyond immediate interactions with non-member states, the Schengen Integration influences international law in broader, more subtle ways.
The Schengen Integration, as a unique and successful example of reciprocal interstate cooperation, sets a precedent for other regions considering similar collective arrangements. It offers a model of how countries can abolish internal borders, harmonise visa policies, and collaborate on border control and law enforcement, all within the context of respect for freedom, security, and justice.
A notable example of the Schengen Integration’s global legal influence is the creation of the CARICOM Single Market and Economy in the Caribbean region. Drawing inspiration from the EU and the Schengen Integration, CARICOM member states aim to facilitate the free movement of goods, services, people, and capital by implementing common economic and trade policies.
On a more systemic level, the Schengen Integration signifies an evolution in the concept of border security in international law. It challenges the traditional paradigm – where each nation-state individually guards its borders – and put forward a model of shared responsibility. This Schengen model has influenced discussions on border control and management at a global level.
Lastly, the collective authorising and enforcement mechanisms of the Schengen laws have led to the development of cross-border legal frameworks and prompted advances in legal cooperation between countries. This has added a new layer to the evolving jurisprudence in international law.
As such, while deeply grounded in European integration, the Schengen Area's legal ramifications extend globally, impacting international law and shaping global norms and practices.
Schengen integration - Key takeaways
- The founding members of the Schengen Area were France, Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands who initiated the concept of abolishing internal barriers and fostered stronger economic, social, and cultural connections.
- The Schengen Area saw its most recent expansion in 2007 when nine new countries including Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, and Malta joined. The inclusion of Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, and Cyprus in the future would encompass virtually all of the EU territory.
- The legal principles governing the Schengen Integration include abolition of internal borders, common visa policy, police and judicial cooperation, protection of external borders, and shared responsibility.
- Effective implementation of Schengen Area has encompassed formulating the Schengen Agreement and the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement (CISA), adaptation of national legislation to align with the Schengen acquis, and setting up infrastructure and systems to facilitate border arrangements and cooperation between law enforcement authorities.
- European institutions like the European Parliament, Council of the European Union, European Commission, and the European Court of Justice play major roles in execution of Schengen laws, ensuring the proper functioning of the Schengen Area.
Learn faster with the 15 flashcards about Schengen integration
Sign up for free to gain access to all our flashcards.
Frequently Asked Questions about Schengen integration
About StudySmarter
StudySmarter is a globally recognized educational technology company, offering a holistic learning platform designed for students of all ages and educational levels. Our platform provides learning support for a wide range of subjects, including STEM, Social Sciences, and Languages and also helps students to successfully master various tests and exams worldwide, such as GCSE, A Level, SAT, ACT, Abitur, and more. We offer an extensive library of learning materials, including interactive flashcards, comprehensive textbook solutions, and detailed explanations. The cutting-edge technology and tools we provide help students create their own learning materials. StudySmarter’s content is not only expert-verified but also regularly updated to ensure accuracy and relevance.
Learn more