What is the process to apply for the Right to Asylum in the UK?

To apply for the right to asylum in the UK, you must be in the country and apply to the UK Border Agency. You will undergo a screening process, then have an asylum interview about your situation. The Home Office will then decide your application, which could take up to six months.

What legal protections are included in the Right to Asylum in the UK?

The Right to Asylum in the UK includes legal protections such as safeguarding the refugee from any form of harm in their home country, right to fair and efficient asylum process, access to public funds if in financial hardship, and the right to work under certain circumstances.

How does the UK government determine eligibility for the Right to Asylum?

The UK Government determines eligibility for the Right to Asylum based on the 1951 United Nations Refugee Convention. Applicants must demonstrate that they are unable to live safely in their home country due to fear of persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political belief, or membership of a particular social group.

Can the Right to Asylum be revoked once it has been granted in the UK?

Yes, the UK can revoke an individual's right to asylum if conditions in the person's home country improve significantly, if they commit a serious crime, or if they were found to have secured protection through deception.

What is the basis for rejecting a Right to Asylum application in the UK?

The UK may reject a Right to Asylum application based on various factors including if the applicant is considered a security risk, committed a serious crime, passed through a 'safe' third country, or if their claims of persecution or harm lack credibility or evidence.

From which legislative document did the Right to Asylum originate?

The 1951 Refugee Convention and the subsequent 1967 Protocol are the foundational documents from where the Right to Asylum originated.

How does Sweden accommodate asylum seekers during their application review process?

In Sweden, asylum seekers can live in accommodations provided by the Swedish Migration Agency, have access to healthcare, and work if their procedure takes longer. It sets Sweden apart from many other countries.

What is the main difference between asylum seekers and refugees in the context of US law?

The main difference lies in where they apply from: asylum seekers apply from within the US or at a port of entry, while refugees make their applications for protection from outside of the US.

What does the Right to Asylum denote?

The Right to Asylum refers to the right of individuals fleeing from their home country due to severe threats to be recognised as a refugee and receive protection from a foreign state.

What does the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) state about the right to seek asylum in the US?

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) states that any foreign national present in the US or at its borders has the right to apply for asylum.

Right to Asylum: US Law & Human Rights

Right to Asylum

Delve into the right to asylum, a critical component of international law, with this comprehensive guide. This vital human rights concept is explored from its roots, offering clarity of definition and concrete examples. You'll further your understanding through a detailed analysis of the right to seek asylum in the context of US law, and a comparative study involving different global contexts will unveil its broader application. Whether you're a law student, an activist, or just an interested individual, here's a chance to expand your knowledge about the right to asylum.

Get started

Understanding the Right to Asylum

Asylum is a protection given by a country to individuals who have fleeing from their home country due to severe threats or the fear of such. In the realm of law, this is called the Right to Asylum.

Severe threats often imply instances of persecution, serious harm, or human rights violations.

Right to Asylum: Its Root in Human Rights Law

The Right to Asylum is deeply rooted in international human rights law. Let's take a closer look.

It originates from the 1951 Refugee Convention and the subsequent 1967 Protocol
Countries signatory to these documents are obliged to respect the Right to Asylum

The 1951 Refugee Convention and the 1967 Protocol are two pivotal instruments of refugee law that set out the basic rights of those who are forcibly displaced.

The principle of non-refoulement in these documents, which forbids the return of a refugee to a place where they face serious threats to life or freedom, underpins the Right to Asylum.

Exploring the Right to Asylum Definition

So, what exactly is the Right to Asylum? Let's define this crucial concept.

The Right to Asylum is the right to be recognised as a refugee and receive protection from a foreign state. This typically includes protection from forcible return and access to basic human rights (e.g., healthcare, education).

Various elements come into play when discussing this right.

Non-refoulement	Prohibition against sending a person back to a location where they could face severe harm
Refugee Determination Process	Precise process to verify if a person seeking asylum fulfils the criteria defined in the Refugee Convention or regional criteria

Illustrative Right to Asylum Examples

Let's take a look at some illustrative examples to better understand the Right to Asylum.

Imagine Tom, a political activist from a dictatorship country where he was threatened with imprisonment for expressing opposing views. To escape this threat, Tom moves to a democratic nation and seeks asylum. Once he has provided sufficient evidence of his situation, Tom's Right to Asylum would be recognised, and he would be entitled to remain in the country and access basic services.

As you can see, the Right to Asylum acts as a crucial safety net for those facing serious harm in their home country.

Right to Seek Asylum in the Framework of US Law

Within the domain of US Law, the Right to Asylum plays a vital role. It's not just an aspect of international human rights law observed by the US, but is expressly recognised in US federal law.

Right to Seek Asylum US Law: An Analysis

The privilege to seek asylum within the US is, principally, governed by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), in essence, says that any foreign national present in the US or at its borders has the right to apply for asylum.

However, it's somewhat complicated to comprehend the finer details without having an understanding of some key terminologies and provisions.

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) is the primary statue that governs immigration law in the US.

Two essential categories are recognised under US law:

Asylum Seekers
Refugees

While both categories refer to individuals who are seeking protection from persecution, the crucial difference lies in where they are applying from.

Asylum Seekers	These are people already in the US or at a port of entry who are seeking protection
Refugees	These are people still outside of the US, typically in a foreign land, when they make their application for protection

Some requirements an asylum seeker would need to prove include:

They have a fear of persecution
Their fear is well-founded
The persecution is due to their race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group

Constitutional Right to Seek Asylum: What it entails?

When we talk about the constitutional Right to Seek Asylum in the US, it's not about a specific amendment that underscores this right. Instead, it's about how the principles of due process and equal protection, deeply embedded in the US Constitution, apply to asylum seekers.

Due process is a principle enshrined in the US Constitution that safeguards against the arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by the Government. Equal protection implies that individuals in similar conditions must be treated equally by the law.

Using these principles, the Supreme Court of the US has stated that the constitution's guarantee of due process applies to all people within the US, including asylum seekers.

For instance, in the case of Zadvydas v. Davis, the Supreme Court established that even aliens who have entered the US unlawfully are entitled to due process. This encompasses asylum seekers, emphasising that their applications must be processed fairly.

Further, the Supreme Court has also made it clear that the constitutional requirement of equal protection applies to everyone, including non-citizens. Thus, this prevents the government from making migration decisions based purely on race or nationality.

The Right to Asylum in Different Global Contexts

While the fundamental tenets of the Right to Asylum are universally understood, the application and interpretation can significantly differ from one jurisdiction to another. This freedom of interpretation is due in part to the discretionary wiggle room left by the key international treaties governing the right, particularly the 1951 Refugee Convention.

Right to Asylum in Other Countries from Persecution

The Right to Asylum is widely recognised around the world as a crucial aspect of human rights protection. However, the procedures, scope, and interpretation of this right can substantially vary from country to country.

Let's delve deep into how the Right to Asylum from persecution operates across different countries.

South Africa, for instance, is known for its progressive asylum legislation. The South African Refugees Act does not limit the rights granted to refugees under the 1951 Refugee Convention. Further, it considers 'events seriously disturbing or disrupting public order' as grounds for granting asylum — a much broader criterion than that stated in the Convention.

Meanwhile, Australia has received attention due to its controversial approach. It uses offshore detention centres for asylum seekers who arrive by boat, creating a process outside the mainland's legal framework.

Offshore detention refers to the practice of detaining asylum seekers who arrive either by boat or intercepted at sea, at facilities located on islands or in other countries, away from the mainland.

In comparison, Germany, after the Syrian crisis, became one of the most welcoming countries for refugees in Europe, recognising the need for strong asylum laws to safeguard those fleeing conflict and persecution.

Comparative Analysis: Right to asylum in various jurisdictions

Given the variance in asylum laws and practices across the world, a comparative analysis can help you better grasp the intricacies of the Right to Asylum.

Country	Procedure	Scope
South Africa	Asylum seekers can live and work in South Africa during their application review	Recognition of events disrupting public order as grounds for asylum
Australia	Offshore detention centres used for asylum seekers reaching by boat	A strict approach, barred arrivals by boat from ever settling in Australia
Germany	Asylum seekers receive 'toleration' status during their application review, given access to basic amenities	Broad interpretation, fair percentage of positive decisions on applications

Let's focus on an illustrative example involving Sweden. Suppose Farah, a student activist from a war-torn country, manages to flee to Sweden due to severe threats she was facing for her political activism at home. Her claim for asylum would be examined by the Swedish Migration Agency. During this process, Farah would be entitled to live in accommodations provided by the Migration Agency, have access to healthcare and, if her procedure takes longer, even have the right to work. These humane provisions differentiate Sweden from many other countries.

Remember, the Right to Asylum is not absolute. Ultimately, it's the individual states that interpret and apply it within their legal frameworks, leading to this wide array of practices and procedures.

Right to Asylum - Key takeaways

Asylum is a protection provided by a country to individuals who have fled from their home country due to severe threats.
The right to Asylum, deeply rooted in international human rights law, originates from the 1951 Refugee Convention and the subsequent 1967 Protocol.
The right to Asylum is the right to be recognised as a refugee and receive protection from a foreign state, including protection from forcible return and access to basic human rights such as healthcare and education.
The principle of non-refoulement, which forbids the return of a refugee to a place where they face serious threats to life or freedom, is fundamental to the right to Asylum.
The Right to Asylum acts as a crucial safety net for individuals facing serious harm in their home country, for instance, political activists fleeing from threats of imprisonment in their home countries.
In the context of US law, the right to Asylum is governed by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) which allows any foreign national present in the US or at its borders to apply for asylum.
The application of the Right to Asylum varies across different global contexts, with variances in procedures, scope, and interpretation in different countries.
The constitutional Right to Seek Asylum in the US is not about a specific amendment but instead revolves around how the principles of due process and equal protection apply to asylum seekers. Such principles prevent the government from making migration decisions based on race or nationality.
Offshore detention, such as implemented by Australia, refers to the practice of detaining asylum seekers who arrive either by boat or intercepted at sea, at facilities located on islands or in other countries, away from the mainland.
An example in a global context is South Africa's progressive asylum legislation that recognises 'events seriously disturbing or disrupting public order' as grounds for granting asylum, which is a broader criterion than that stated in the Convention.

Right to Asylum

StudySmarter Editorial Team

Understanding the Right to Asylum