Explanations 
Flashcards 
StudySmarter AI 
Notes 
Study Plans 
Study Sets 
Exams 
Magazine 
Find a job 
Mobile App 
Jump to a key chapter
Understanding Prohibition of Discrimination in Labour Law
The prohibition of discrimination is a fundamental principle in labour law and human rights worldwide. Knowledge of this concept is crucial for any student planning to delve into the sphere of law or human resources—or indeed, any field where fair treatment is paramount.
Explanation of Prohibition of Discrimination Concept
Before we delve into the intricate details of this concept, let's formally define it:
The prohibition of discrimination means that every person shall receive equal treatment in similar circumstances, especially in terms of employment rights. This prohibition forbids discrimination based on characteristics such as race, gender, age, disability, religion, or sexual orientation.
This principle ensures that all individuals have equal prospects and Securing this right is paramount to maintaining a fair and just society.
- It upholds the principle of fairness: All individuals deserve an equal opportunity to succeed.
- It helps foster diversity and inclusion: By eliminating discrimination, we allow for a more diverse and enriched societal makeup.
- It promotes economic growth: Equality can contribute to economic development by utilising the full potential of the workforce.
There are also various types of discrimination that are prohibited in labour law, including:
| Direct Discrimination | Occurs when someone is treated less favourably because of a characteristic protected by law. |
| Indirect Discrimination | Occurs when an apparently neutral provision, criterion or practice would put a certain group at a disadvantage compared with other persons, unless it is objectively justified. |
| Harassment | Unwanted conduct related to a protected characteristic that violates a person’s dignity or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment. |
| Victimisation | Occurs when an individual is treated badly as a reaction to a complaint about discrimination. |
The definition and importance of Prohibition of Discrimination
Prohibition of discrimination is not just a principle but a necessity, in the context of employment and various aspects of society.
Prohibition of discrimination ensures everyone is given equal opportunities to succeed without being hindered or preferred due to their personal characteristics.
For example, if two equally qualified individuals apply for a promotion, and one is chosen over the other purely because of their gender, it directly conflicts with the prohibition of discrimination. In such a scenario, both applicants should have had an equal chance of securing the promotion, based solely on their qualifications and capabilities. The gender of the candidates should have not influenced the decision.
Historical perspective of Prohibition of Discrimination in Labour Law
The idea of prohibiting discrimination has been around for many centuries, but it truly took root in the 20th century. The most significant developments took place post World War II, with declarations and conventions at the United Nations and European Union levels.
The non-discrimination principle was further deepened with the adoption of different laws in the civil rights movement in the United States and other countries around the world.
Today, prohibition of discrimination is a mainstay of labour laws across the globe, working towards a fair and equitable society.
A notable case is the "Brown v. Board of Education" Supreme Court decision in the United States, in 1954. This case challenged and overturned the principle of "separate but equal," a significant blow to legally-sanctioned racial discrimination at the time. It set the precedent for future anti-discrimination laws.
Types of Discrimination Prohibited by Federal Law
While many countries mandate the prohibition of discrimination, some enforce it more rigorously than others. In particular, federal laws in countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom have outlined specific types of discrimination that are considered illegal. Understanding these types is crucial for enforcing the principle of equal rights and opportunities for all. Let's dive into these different kinds of discrimination.
Exploring the different kinds of discrimination banned by law
A variety of specific types of discrimination are explicitly banned under federal law in many countries. Here is a list of some of the most commonly encountered ones:
- Age discrimination: Involves treating an applicant or employee less favourably because of their age.
- Disability discrimination: Involves treating a qualified individual with a disability who is an employee or applicant unfavourably because of their disability.
- Gender discrimination: Involves treating someone unfavourably because of that person's sex.
- Racial discrimination: Occurs when individuals are treated unfavourably because of their race or personal characteristics associated with their race.
- Religious discrimination: Involves treating a person unfavourably because of their religious beliefs.
While it's important to note these specific categories, federal law generally prohibits any discrimination that involves treating someone less favourably based on personal characteristics covered by law.
Explanation of specific kinds of discrimination
Now that you have a brief overview of the types of discrimination, let's explore each one in more depth. Understanding the details can help us to recognise discriminatory situations and work towards mitigating them.
Age discrimination often arises in situations such as hiring, firing, pay, job assignments, promotions, layoff, training, and benefits. It is noteworthy that it is not illegal for an employer to favour an older worker over a younger one, even if both workers are age 40 or older.
Disability discrimination can occur when an employer covers the disabled employee or applicant unfavourably. Importantly, the law requires an employer to provide a 'reasonable accommodation' to an employee or job applicant with a disability, unless doing so would cause significant difficulty.
Gender discrimination involves treating someone unfavourably because of their sex, and can also extend to sexual harassment and pregnancy discrimination. It's noteworthy that this law doesn't just protect females, but anyone who's discriminated against because of their sex.
Notably, in the landmark case of 'Obergefell v. Hodges', the definition of sex discrimination was broadened by the U.S. Supreme Court to include discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, providing security and equality to the LGBTQ+ community.
Overview of discriminatory practices at workplace
In a workplace setting, many discriminatory practices can occur that violate federal law. From the hiring process right through to termination or retirement, each stage has potential for undesirable discriminatory actions to occur.
An employer might be in violation if they decide to hire a less qualified candidate over a more qualified one on the basis of a characteristic protected by law. The same applies in the case of promotions, where personal characteristics rather than job performance or experience dictate the advancement. Discrimination can also surface in the allocation of workplace benefits, or in a boss or co-worker creating a hostile work environment through unwelcome comments or behaviour.
Understanding these various forms of workplace discrimination can equip us to recognise and challenge such practices, ensuring a fairer, more inclusive professional environment for all.
The Civil Rights Act of 1866 and Discrimination
One of the most significant pieces of legislation in the history of the prohibition of discrimination is the United States Civil Rights Act of 1866. Not only did this act serve as a turning point in American history, but it has also played a crucial role in shaping anti-discrimination law as we know it today.
How the Civil Rights Act of 1866 Prohibits Discrimination
The Civil Rights Act of 1866 was initially enacted to protect the rights of newly freed slaves after the end of the American Civil War. However, this legislation's significance extends beyond its historical context, offering a broader impact on discrimination and equality.
The main provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 states that "all persons shall have the same rights... to make and enforce contracts... as is enjoyed by white citizens". This provision, codified as 42 U.S.C. § 1981, provides a powerful tool to combat discrimination.
This act, therefore, fundamentally prohibits racial discrimination in the making and enforcement of contracts. It applies to all contracts, including those related to employment.
On face value, § 1981 seems to only prohibit racial discrimination. However, courts have interpreted this to also include discrimination on the basis of:
- Ethnicity: Discrimination due to a person's ethnic characteristics
- Alienage: Discrimination due to a person's foreign-born status, or their connections with a particular country
It's important to mention a landmark case related to § 1981: 'Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji'. The U.S. Supreme Court held that the Civil Rights Act of 1866 covers discrimination on the basis of ethnicity, whether or not it's also connected to race. This broadened the protection offered by the law, marking a pivotal development in its interpretation.
The effect of the Civil Rights Act on employment discrimination
As you might appreciate, the Civil Rights Act of 1866 has had substantial effects on reducing employment discrimination.
With its prohibition of discrimination in contract-making, it directly impacts recruitment, promotions, terminations, and other employment-related contracts. This prevents employers from establishing practices that could disproportionately disadvantage individuals of certain races or ethnicities.
Take for instance an employment contract. The Act outlaws any discrimination in the contract's terms and conditions based on the employee’s race or ethnicity. If an employer denies employment to a qualified individual based solely on their race, they would be in direct violation of § 1981. Thus, making a significant step in the direction of equality in the workplace.
Shifts in legislation's interpretation over time
The Civil Rights Act of 1866 remains a cornerstone of anti-discrimination law, even though its interpretation has shifted over time.
In its early years, the Act's main function was to protect the rights of former slaves and ensure their equal treatment post-Emancipation. Over time, its most significant shift took place in the 20th century, when its reach was expanded to cover all racial and ethnic discrimination across all private workplaces.
One such development was the ruling in 'Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.' In this landmark case from 1968, the Supreme Court ruled that § 1981 prohibits racial discrimination in all private sales and rentals of property, not just state or public transactions. This substantially broadened the scope of the Act and cemented its role in combating discrimination.
In more recent times, while the Act still functions as a robust anti-discrimination tool, challenges have arisen. The courts have grappled with defining the exact bounds of its protections, examining issues such as whether the Act should be held to cover new categories of identity, like sexual orientation and gender identity.
Regardless of these challenges, the Civil Rights Act of 1866 remains a vital component in the toolkit used to combat discrimination in the United States and continues to shape equality law and discourse.
The OSH Act's Stance on Discrimination
In the pursuit of prohibiting discrimination at the workplace, the United States Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act plays a significant role. The OSH Act, enacted in 1970, primarily focuses on assuring safe and healthful working conditions for employees. However, it also includes provisions that prevent businesses from discriminating against workers.
Understanding which section of the OSH Act prohibits employers from discriminating
The OSH Act has a dedicated section that specifically prohibits any form of discrimination against employees—Section 11(c).
Section 11(c) of the OSH Act prohibits employers from discriminating against employees for exercising their rights under the Act. This includes various employee activities, such as lodging complaints about safety and health conditions, seeking an OSHA inspection, participating in an OSHA inspection, participating in proceedings related to an OSHA inspection, or reporting a work-related injury.
Typically, the discrimination guarded against by Section 11(c) often manifests in the form of:
- Retaliation for reporting workplace hazards
- Retaliation for filing complaints with OSHA
- Retaliatory termination
- Demotion or decrease in salary or hours
- Reassignment to a less desirable position
Unpacking the specific sections of the OSH Act against discrimination
For a more in-depth understanding of the OSH Act’s stance on discrimination, particularly under Section 11(c), it is essential to explore its specifics.
Under Section 11(c), if an employer is found guilty of discrimination, the employer can be subjected to penalties, including reinstatement of the employee to his or her old position, payment of back wages, and restoration of benefits. Any employee who believes that he or she was the subject of discrimination due to protected activity can file a complaint with OSHA within 30 days of the alleged reprisal.
For instance, suppose an employee, witnessing unsafe working conditions, reports this situation to OSHA. If the employer then retaliates by decreasing the employee's wage or unfavourably reassigning them, they are in direct violation of Section 11(c). The employee, in this case, has the right to file a complaint within 30 days of this action. If the employer is found guilty after an investigation, they could be ordered to reinstate the employee's original wage or position, or provide back pay, reaffirming the law's stance against discrimination.
How the OSH Act safeguards employee rights
The OSH Act brings forth crucial protections and safeguards for employee rights, primarily through anti-discrimination provisions like Section 11(c). However, such provisions are not the Act’s only tools for promoting safer, fairer work environments.
The OSH Act also establishes the right of employees to request an inspection if they believe that their workplace is not in compliance with OSHA standards or if there are serious hazards. Furthermore, employees can also participate (anonymously, if they choose) in OSHA workplace inspections
No aspect of Section 11(c) prevents employees from seeking protection or compensation for damages elsewhere. It's worth noting that even if the Secretary of Labor decides not to file suit under Section 11(c), the worker can still pursue private legal remedies, depending on the circumstances and the state's laws.
The OSH Act, particularly with Section 11(c), creates a safety net that stands against discrimination, promoting a culture of safety, fairness, and respect in workplaces throughout the United States.
Disparate Treatment vs Disparate Impact and Non-discrimination Law
Two significant concepts relating to the prohibition of discrimination are disparate treatment and disparate impact. Grasping these terms can help you better understand how anti-discrimination laws operate and how they aim to create a fair and equitable society.
Distinguishing between disparate treatment and disparate impact
Distinguishing between disparate treatment and disparate impact is key in understanding the full scope of non-discrimination law. Both refer to unlawful forms of discrimination, but they occur in different scenarios and are proven in different ways.
Disparate treatment occurs when an individual of a protected class is intentionally treated differently from others based on their protected characteristic. It boils down to intentional discrimination.
Disparate impact, on the other hand, refers to practices that may appear neutral but disproportionately affect individuals of a protected class compared to other individuals. In this case, the discrimination might not be overtly intentional, but is still unlawful due to the unfair impact it creates.
Principles of disparate treatment
The principles of disparate treatment are essential to the question of active, intention-fuelled discrimination in the workplace.
Disparate treatment often involves direct discrimination, where an employee is treated less favourably due to their race, gender, nationality, or any other protected characteristic. This could occur at any stage—hiring, pay decisions, promotions, or terminations.
For example, if a female job applicant is refused employment only because the employer deems the position 'more suitable for a man', it's a clear case of disparate treatment based on gender. The employer is directly discriminating against the applicant due to her protected characteristic of sex.
Understand how disparate impact operates
Disparate impact operates slightly differently from disparate treatment as it usually involves unintentional discrimination. It refers to seemingly neutral and non-discriminatory practices which, in reality, have a discriminatory effect on a protected group.
Despite the protectected group's members not being explicitly singled out, if they are disproportionately affected by a certain policy or practice, it could be a case of disparate impact.
Consider a hiring requirement involving a physical fitness test. Suppose the average pass rate for female applicants is significantly lower than for male applicants, despite the test having no crucial relevance to the job role. In this case, the fitness test may establish a disparate impact against women, as it disproportionately excludes them from employment opportunities, despite appearing neutral on the surface.
The Principles of Non-discrimination Law
Non-discrimination law operates on certain principles that aim to ensure equality and justice, prohibit discrimination, and institute affirmative action where necessary.
Establishing and understanding non-discrimination law principles
There are several key principles that form the basis of non-discrimination law. These principles govern how non-discrimination laws are interpreted and applied:
- Equality: The law should ensure that all individuals enjoy the same rights and opportunities.
- Proportionality: Any discrimination can only be justified if it is proportionate—meaning the least harmful means possible—to achieving a legitimate aim.
- Reasonable accommodation: Reasonable adjustments should be made to ensure that people with disabilities can participate fully and equally in society.
The practice and implementation of non-discrimination laws in the workplace
Non-discrimination laws are not just theoretical constructs—they must be actively practised and implemented in the workplace.
This implementation involves being conscious of and active in eliminating both disparate treatment and disparate impact. Practices or rules that discriminate intentionally or result in discrimination inadvertently need to be reviewed and restructured to ensure fair and equal treatment.
For instance, employers should avoid using a person’s age, race, gender, or other protected characteristics to make decisions on hiring, firing, promotions, and other work-related aspects. Additionally, they should regularly evaluate their policies and practices to ensure they don’t disproportionately disadvantage certain groups, which could constitute disparate impact.
All in all, a thorough understanding of non-discrimination law, including disparate treatment and disparate impact, can guide both employers and employees towards maintaining a fair and equitable professional environment.
Prohibition of discrimination - Key takeaways
- Brown v. Board of Education: a paramount case in U.S. law that challenged the principle of "separate but equal", thereby setting the precedent for future anti-discrimination laws.
- Discrimination types prohibited by federal law: Age discrimination, Disability discrimination, Gender discrimination, Racial discrimination, and Religious discrimination.
- The Civil Rights Act of 1866: a significant U.S. legislation which initially protected the rights of newly freed slaves after the Civil War. The main provision prohibits racial discrimination in contracts, including employment, and courts have interpreted it to cover discrimination on the basis of ethnicity and alienage as well.
- The OSH (Occupational Safety and Health) Act: enacted in 1970 to ensure safe working conditions and includes provisions that prevent businesses from discriminating against workers. Particularly, Section 11(c) prohibits employers from discriminating against employees for exercising their rights under the Act.
- Disparate Treatment vs Disparate Impact: Two crucial legal concepts related to discrimination. Disparate treatment refers to intentional discriminatory practices, while disparate impact can result from policies that appear neutral but have a discriminatory effect.
Learn faster with the 15 flashcards about Prohibition of discrimination
Sign up for free to gain access to all our flashcards.
Frequently Asked Questions about Prohibition of discrimination
About StudySmarter
StudySmarter is a globally recognized educational technology company, offering a holistic learning platform designed for students of all ages and educational levels. Our platform provides learning support for a wide range of subjects, including STEM, Social Sciences, and Languages and also helps students to successfully master various tests and exams worldwide, such as GCSE, A Level, SAT, ACT, Abitur, and more. We offer an extensive library of learning materials, including interactive flashcards, comprehensive textbook solutions, and detailed explanations. The cutting-edge technology and tools we provide help students create their own learning materials. StudySmarter’s content is not only expert-verified but also regularly updated to ensure accuracy and relevance.
Learn more