To improve your competency in solving problems on the coefficient of friction, here are a few more examples.
A block of mass \(10\, \text{kg}\) is placed on a table and fitted on opposite sides by two springs attached to a \(5\, \text{kg}\) and \(12\, \text{kg}\) mass respectively. If blocks and tables have a standard coefficient of friction of \(0.4\), find the acceleration and tension in the springs.
Solution:
Make a diagram to have a clearer picture of what the question is saying.
Fig. 9. Determining the tension on springs using coefficient of friction.
Now, you need to determine the forces acting on the object on the table and indicate them with a diagram. Here you need to be very careful, note that because the \(12\, \text{kg}\) would pull more force than that of the \(5\, \text{kg}\) mass, thus the object is more likely to move towards the right.
However, this hypothesis of yours depends on if the force is greater than the frictional force, otherwise, the object would remain static on the table.
Hence, the frictional force is acting towards the right to prevent the tension pulled by the \(12\, \text{kg}\) mass.
Fig. 10. An Illustration of forces acting on a body pulled by springs attached to masses.
From the above diagram, you shall understand what happens at each point.
Don't fret, just start from the extreme ends, either left or right, and keep analysing the action of forces till you get to the opposite end.
From the extreme left, we see that the \(5\, \text{kg}\) mass applies a downward force, \(49\, N\), but the system above it causes tension, \(T_2\), which tends to move the mass upwards with an acceleration \(a\). This can thus be expressed as
\[T_2-49\, \text{N}=5\, \text{kg}\times a\]
This is because, in the end, the \(5\, \text{kg}\) mass is pulled up to move to an acceleration, \(a\).
Now, regarding the object on the table, you would observe that the tension, \(T_2\), tends to draw the object towards the left. Also, the frictional force acts towards the left since it tries to obstruct the rightward movement caused by the tension, \(T_1\), acting towards the right. This is expressed as
\[T_1-T_2-F=10\, \text{kg}\times a\]
This is because after the two leftward forces (i.e. \(T_2\) and \(F\) ) have tried to overcome the rightward force \(T_1\) and failed, it is expected that the object of mass \(10\, \text{kg}\) would move towards the right with an acceleration, \(a\).
When you look at the third mass at the left extreme, you would notice that the mass applies a downward force \(117.6\, \text{N}\), and it is being resisted by the upward tension on the spring, \(T_1\). Therefore, this can be expressed as
\[117.6\, \text{N}-T_1=12\, \text{kg}\times a\]
Due to the expectation that the downward force applied by the \(117.6\, \text{N}\) is meant to overpower that of the tension \(T_1\), then, the mass \(12\, \text{kg}\) should supposedly move with an acceleration, \(a\).
Now, we have three equations from the above explained.
These three equations are:
\[T_2-49\, \text{N}=5\, \text{kg}\times a\]
\[T_1-T_2-F=10\, \text{kg}\times a\]
\[117.6\, \text{N}-T_1=12\, \text{kg}\times a\]
Sum up all 3 equations, hence, \[T_2-49\, \text{N}+T_1-T_2-F+117.6\, \text{N}-T_1=5a+10a+12a\] which gives
\[68.6\, \text{N}-F=27a\]
Note that
\[F=µR\]
with
\[µ=0.4\]
and
\[R=W=98\, \text{N}\]
then,
\[F=0.4\times 98\, \text{N}\]
\[F=39.2\, \text{N}\]
Therefore, substitute the value of \(F\) into the equation and arrive at
\[68.6\, \text{N}-39.2\, \text{N}=27\times a\]
which is
\[27a=29.4\, \text{N}\]
Divide both sides by 27 to find the acceleration, \(a\), as
\[a=1.09\, \text{ms}^{-2}\]
To determine the tensions on the springs, \(T_1\) and \(T_2\), we substitute the earlier outlined equations.
Recall that
\[T_2-49\, \text{N}=5\, \text{kg} \times a\]
Therefore,
\[T_2-49\, \text{N}=5\, \text{kg}\times 1.09\, \text{ms}^{-2}\]
this gives
\[T_2-49\text{ N}=5.45\, \text{N}\]
Add \(49\, \text{N}\) to both sides of the equation to get our tension, \(T_2\), as
\[T_2=54.45\, \text{N}\]
Recall that
\[T_1-T_2-F=10\text{ kg} \times a\]
and \(F\) is \(39.2\, \text{N}\), \(a\) is \(1.09\, \text{ms}^{-2}\) and \(T_2\) is \(54.45\, \text{N}\).
Hence, substitute into the equation
\[T_1-54.45\, \text{N}-39.2\, \text{N}=10\, \text{kg}\times 1.09\, \text{ms}^{-2}\]
which gives
\[T_1-93.65\, \text{N}=10.9\, \text{N}\]
Add \(93.65\, \text{N}\) to both sides of the equation to get our tension, \(T_1\), as
\[T_1=104.55\, \text{N}\]
An individual stands immobile on the slope of a mountain and the coefficient of friction between the sole of his feet and the mountain surface is \(0.26\). If in the following year, there was a volcanic eruption that increased the coefficient of friction between the sole of his foot and the mountain by \(0.34\), by what angle has the slope of the mountain increased or decreased?
Solution:
To determine the angle made by the slope of the mountain, we recall that \[µ=\tan\theta\]
Hence the current slope of the mountain has an angle of
\[0.26=\tan\theta\]
Take the inverse to find \(\theta\)
\[\theta=\tan^{-1}(0.26)\]
Hence, the current slope of the mountain has an angle \[\theta=14.57°\]
However, the year after, the mountain experienced an eruption that increased the coefficient of friction by \(0.34\). Thus, the new coefficient of friction is
\[µ_{new}=0.26+0.34\]
which gives
\[µ_{new}=0.6\]
We need to determine the new angle of the slope of the mountain using
\[µ_{new}=\tan\theta\]
Thus,
\[0.6=\tan\theta\]
Take the inverse to find \(\theta\)
\[\theta=\tan^{-1}(0.6)\]
Hence, the new slope of the mountain has an angle
\[\theta=30.96°\]
The mountain slope had a previous angle of \(14.57°\), but upon the eruption it increased to \(30.96°\) by
\[30.96°-14.57°=16.39°\]
Therefore, the eruption increased the angle between the mountain slope by \(16.39°\).