Who introduced the Gettier problem and when?

The Gettier problem was introduced by Edmund Gettier in 1963.

What is the significance of the Gettier problem in epistemology?

The Gettier problem's significance in epistemology lies in its challenge to the traditional definition of knowledge as justified true belief. It demonstrates that having justified true belief does not necessarily entail knowledge, prompting reevaluation and refinement of epistemological theories about the nature and conditions of knowledge.

What are some common solutions proposed for the Gettier problem?

Common solutions proposed for the Gettier problem include refining the definition of knowledge to include a "no false lemmas" condition, proposing a causal theory of knowledge, and utilizing modal conditions like "safety" and "sensitivity" conditions to prevent justified true beliefs from being considered knowledge if they rely on luck.

What are some examples of Gettier cases?

Gettier cases often involve scenarios where an individual holds a justified true belief that isn't knowledge. A classic example is Smith and the job: Smith believes Jones will get the job and has ten coins; unknowingly, Smith, who also has ten coins, gets the job. Another is a stopped clock, showing the correct time by chance.

Why is the Gettier problem challenging for the traditional definition of knowledge?

The Gettier problem challenges the traditional definition of knowledge as "justified true belief" by presenting scenarios where individuals have beliefs that are both justified and true, yet intuitively not knowledge. These examples show that the three conditions might be met without actually constituting genuine knowledge.

Who played a crucial role in the traditional concept of knowledge before Gettier?

Socrates challenged the traditional view of knowledge.

What does the Gettier Problem challenge in the field of epistemology?

It questions the validity of empirical evidence.

What does Reliabilism propose to address the Gettier Problem?

It excludes emotions and intuition from the knowledge process.

What are suggested modifications to address the Gettier Problem?

Increase the belief requirement to allow for contradictory propositions.

Gettier problem: Explained & Examples

Gettier problem

The Gettier problem, named after philosopher Edmund Gettier, challenges the traditional definition of knowledge as "justified true belief" by presenting scenarios where individuals have justified beliefs that are true but not considered knowledge due to a lack of a causal link. These thought experiments, introduced in Gettier's 1963 paper, highlight cases where the justification for a belief coincidentally aligns with truth, yet does so by luck rather than actual knowledge. Understanding the Gettier problem is essential for students studying epistemology, as it underscores the complexities involved in defining what constitutes true knowledge.

Get started

What is the Gettier Problem

The Gettier Problem is a fundamental question in the philosophy of knowledge that challenges the traditional definition of knowledge. It revolves around the idea that having a justified true belief does not necessarily amount to knowledge.

Background of the Gettier Problem

Before understanding the Gettier Problem, it's crucial to grasp the traditional concept of knowledge, which was largely influenced by the ancient Greek philosopher Plato. The traditional view posits that knowledge is a justified true belief. This can be broken down into three main components:

Belief – You must believe in the proposition.
Truth – The proposition must be true.
Justification – There must be evidence or reasons supporting the belief.

In 1963, Edmund Gettier published a short paper that brought new perspectives to this traditional view, demonstrating situations where individuals had justified true beliefs that still didn’t count as knowledge.

Example of a Gettier Case:Imagine you are in a windowless room and see a clock that reads 3 PM. You form the belief that the time is 3 PM. Unknown to you, the clock stopped exactly 12 hours ago, and by coincidence, it is indeed 3 PM. Although your belief is true and justified by the clock's reading, it is not knowledge according to the Gettier Problem.

Gettier’s paper, though brief, challenged the well-established belief that the justified true belief model was sufficient for knowledge. His insights opened up numerous discussions and prompted philosophers to re-examine the criteria for knowledge. Some have proposed additional requirements to overcome the Gettier Problem, including:

Adding a condition that rules out luck, ensuring the justification is reliable and not merely coincidental.
Introducing a fourth condition, like the No False Lemmas condition, suggesting that any reasoning from false premises cannot lead to knowledge.

These modifications have yet to be universally accepted, indicating the complexity and depth the Gettier Problem presents in the realm of philosophy.

Gettier Problem Philosophy

The Gettier Problem is a critical issue in the philosophy of knowledge, questioning the classical concept of what constitutes knowledge.

Understanding the Traditional View of Knowledge

The traditional view of knowledge, often attributed to ancient Greek philosophers, defines knowledge as a justified true belief. This definition holds that for someone to 'know' something, three conditions must be satisfied:

Belief – The person must believe in the proposition.
Truth – The proposition must actually be true.
Justification – There must be adequate evidence or reasons to support the belief.

However, this definition encounters challenges through the Gettier Problem.

Introduction of the Gettier Problem

In 1963, Edmund Gettier published a brief yet impactful paper that called into question the sufficiency of the justified true belief model. By presenting cases where justified true beliefs do not equate to knowledge, Gettier's examples created a philosophical conundrum that has yet to be universally resolved.

Gettier Case Example:Suppose you are in a countryside location and rely on a farmer to inform you that the family cow is in the barn. You see a cow-shaped object in the barn, confirming your belief. However, unknown to you, it's a cardboard cutout of a cow. The real cow is behind the barn. Your belief is justified and true, yet according to the Gettier Problem, it isn't knowledge.

Attempts to Resolve the Gettier Problem

In response to the Gettier Problem, philosophers have proposed several solutions to redefine knowledge:

Reliabilism – Suggests that belief should be formed through a reliable process.
No False Beliefs – Proposes removing any false assumptions or premises that lead to a conclusion.
Contextualism – Introduces varying standards of knowledge depending on context and standards.

Each proposal attempts to refine the criteria of knowledge to address situations where justified true belief falls short, but consensus remains elusive.

The Gettier Problem compellingly demonstrates that not all justified true beliefs qualify as knowledge, provoking ongoing philosophical debate.

Gettier Problem of Knowledge

The Gettier Problem presents a significant challenge to the conventional understanding of what it means to know something. It highlights scenarios where a person holds a belief that is both justified and true, yet surprisingly, does not constitute knowledge.

Foundational Background

The classical theory of knowledge, going back to ancient philosophy, posited knowledge as a justified true belief. This traditional model includes:

Belief - The individual must believe the proposition in question.
Truth - The proposition needs to be true in reality.
Justification - There should be adequate reasoning or evidence underpinning the belief.

Yet, this understanding faced significant challenges with the introduction of the Gettier Problem in 1963 by Edmund Gettier.

Gettier Problem Definition: A philosophical problem challenging the idea that a justified true belief is sufficient for knowledge by presenting cases where these conditions are met but still do not result in knowledge.

Illustrative Gettier Case:Picture an office where you see an object that seems to be an award on a colleague’s desk and believe they won it. Unknown to you, the original award was misplaced elsewhere, and what you saw was a perfectly replicated model someone placed there as a practical joke. Despite your belief being justified and accidentally true (since they indeed won the award), it isn't considered knowledge due to the deceptive context.

Philosophical responses to the Gettier Problem often explore expanding the concept of knowledge beyond justified true belief. Such attempts include:

No False Lemmas - Adding an extra condition to ensure no false premises contribute to the belief formation.
Reliabilism - Suggesting that the process of forming the belief must be reliable.
Defeasibility - Proposing that there must be no undermining evidence that, if known, would prevent the justification.

These approaches continue to foster debate, as no single solution has achieved universal acceptance, highlighting the complexity of truly defining knowledge.

Peter Klein's introduction of 'defeaters' has added a new layer to addressing the Gettier Problem, emphasizing the role of additional evidence in belief verification.

Gettier Problem Examples

The Gettier Problem provides intriguing scenarios where our understanding of knowledge is put to the test. It questions whether justified true belief is enough for knowledge by presenting cases where individuals seem to have justified true beliefs without possessing knowledge.

Gettier Problem Explained

Gettier Problem Definition: A philosophical conundrum that challenges the notion of knowledge being merely a justified true belief, by demonstrating situations where these conditions are fulfilled, yet knowledge is absent.

Understanding the Gettier Problem requires familiarity with the traditional tripartite theory of knowledge that defines it as justified true belief. Here’s a breakdown:

Belief - You must believe the proposition.
Truth - The proposition must correspond with reality.
Justification - There must be sufficient evidence or reasons for the belief.

In his 1963 paper, Edmund Gettier presented cases where these three conditions are satisfied yet still fail to constitute knowledge.

Example of a Gettier Case:A student believes the teacher is in the office because they see the teacher's coat hanging on the chair. Unknown to the student, the teacher left the coat there and is teaching a class elsewhere. Despite the justification and the truth (if the teacher returns to retrieve the coat), it does not constitute knowledge according to the Gettier Problem.

Gettier Problems show that accidental truths can mislead us into thinking we have knowledge when we do not.

Famous Gettier Cases

Several famous cases illustrate the Gettier Problem's scope and impact on philosophy. These scenarios involve circumstances where the justification leads to a true belief, yet knowledge is questionable.

Fake Barn County - A scenario where a person sees a real barn in an area filled with fake barns, leading to justified true belief but no knowledge.
Multiple Job Applicants - A case where a person believes a man with ten coins in his pocket will get a job, forming the belief based on reasonable evidence, but the person in question is not the actual recipient though the coins still indicate a correct assumption.

Gettier cases reveal profound insights into the nature of knowledge. Philosophers have been prompted to rethink and refine the conditions required for someone to truly 'know' something. This includes the exploration of the No False Lemmas approach, which proposes the exclusion of beliefs formed from false premises, and Reliabilism, which emphasizes the means of belief acquisition as a factor in defining knowledge.

No False Lemmas	Excludes false beliefs from the foundation of knowledge.
Reliabilism	Focuses on the reliability of the belief-forming process.

These concepts suggest that the Gettier Problem helps us understand the complexities and gray areas within epistemology that challenge long-held views.

Implications of the Gettier Problem in Philosophy

The implications of the Gettier Problem reach deeply into epistemology, prompting a re-evaluation of what constitutes knowledge. Its influence extends across several areas:

Epistemic Justification - Encourages deeper exploration into what it means for a belief to be adequately justified.
Philosophical Methodology - Affects how philosophical analyses and methodologies approach the concept of defining terms, particularly knowledge.
Analytical Philosophy - Helps refine and improve other theories such as context-dependence and defeasibility regarding knowledge.

The Gettier Problem encourages ongoing investigation and debate on the true nature of knowledge and its essential characteristics.

Solutions to the Gettier Problem

Many proposed solutions aim to resolve the issues posed by the Gettier Problem, suggesting additional criteria or alterations to the classic model of justified true belief:

Reliabilist Theories - These argue that a belief must not only be justified and true but must also be produced by a reliable method.
No False Grounds - Posits that knowledge must not be based on any false essential beliefs or assumptions.
Contextualism - Argues that the conditions for knowledge might vary depending on different contexts and social settings.

Each proposal presents a unique methodological approach, reflecting diverse philosophical perspectives about how to frame true knowledge beyond accidental truths or mere beliefs.

Example of a Proposed Solution:Reliabilist approaches suggest using methods like scientific experimentation, which relies on repeatable and reliable processes, to legitimize knowledge claims, minimizing issues similar to Gettier cases.

Gettier problem - Key takeaways

Gettier Problem: A challenge in philosophy that questions the classical definition of knowledge as justified true belief.
Traditional Knowledge Concept: Defined by Plato as needing belief, truth, and justification.
Gettier Cases: Examples where justified true beliefs do not equate to knowledge, such as seeing a stopped clock showing the correct time.
Philosophical Impact: Gettier's work prompted re-examinations of knowledge criteria, leading to ongoing debates in epistemology.
Proposed Solutions: Suggestions include adding conditions like No False Lemmas or using a reliable process for belief formation.
Philosophical Responses: Methods like Reliabilism and Contextualism are proposed to refine the understanding of knowledge.

Gettier problem

StudySmarter Editorial Team