What is the relationship between supervenience and reductionism?

Supervenience and reductionism are related but distinct concepts. Supervenience describes a dependency relationship where changes in higher-level properties correspond to changes in lower-level properties, without implying reducibility. Reductionism, on the other hand, suggests that higher-level properties can be fully explained by or reduced to lower-level properties. Thus, while supervenience indicates dependence, reductionism implies reducibility.

How does supervenience relate to mental states and physical states?

Supervenience in philosophy describes how mental states depend on physical states. If two situations are identical in all physical aspects, they must be identical in their mental aspects. This implies that any change in mental states necessitates a change in the underlying physical states. It doesn't, however, specify how the two are connected causally.

What are the different types of supervenience?

The different types of supervenience include:1. **Weak Supervenience**: A set of properties A weakly supervenes on a set B if any two objects that are identical in B-properties are identical in A-properties, within a possible world.2. **Strong Supervenience**: Strong supervenience requires that if two objects have the same B-properties in any possible world, they must have the same A-properties in that world and all possible worlds.3. **Global Supervenience**: This involves the idea that any two worlds that are identical in B-properties are identical in A-properties.

What is the difference between supervenience and emergence?

Supervenience describes a dependence relation where higher-level properties rely on lower-level properties without any causal influence, meaning no change in the higher-level without a change in the lower-level. Emergence involves higher-level properties arising from lower-level interactions, often possessing causal powers or features not evident in the base properties.

How does supervenience influence debates on moral realism?

Supervenience influences debates on moral realism by suggesting that moral properties depend on, but are not reducible to, non-moral properties. This framework supports moral realism by maintaining that objective moral truths exist and are determined by underlying physical or psychological states, ensuring a consistent connection between moral and non-moral worlds.

What is Jaegwon Kim's main contribution to philosophy?

Development of quantum mechanics theories.

What is a key feature of supervenience in philosophy?

It necessitates causality between separate domains.

How does Humean Supervenience view scientific laws?

As necessities determined by metaphysical entities.

What is Humean Supervenience primarily concerned with?

The inevitability of metaphysical entities as fundamental structures.

According to Humean Supervenience, what is invariant across possible worlds?

Philosophical doctrines on determinism.

What is the causal exclusion argument proposed by Kim?

Suggests physical states need mental triggers to form causal chains.

Supervenience: Definition & Theory

supervenience

Supervenience is a philosophical concept that describes a relationship between sets of properties, where one set, typically higher-level properties (such as mental states), depends on another set of lower-level properties (like physical states) in such a way that any change in the higher-level properties necessitates a change in the lower-level ones. This relationship is crucial in debates about mind-body interaction, where the mental properties supervene on physical properties without being reducible to them, highlighting the dependence but not the identity between different kinds of properties. Understanding supervenience helps clarify discussions in metaphysics, epistemology, and the philosophy of mind, emphasizing the importance of the dependence relationship in maintaining consistency within interconnected systems.

Get started

Supervenience Definition

Supervenience is a fundamental concept in metaphysics and philosophy that addresses the relationship between sets of properties or facts. When one set of properties supervenes on another set, any change in the supervenient properties must be accompanied by a change in the subvenient properties.

Philosophical Analysis of Supervenience

Supervenience is a term frequently discussed in philosophical contexts as it provides a multifaceted way to explore relationships between phenomena. A core idea in its philosophical application is that higher-level properties depend on, but are not reducible to, lower-level properties. For example, the mental states of a person might supervene on their physical brain states. This relationship suggests that two individuals with identical brain states must have identical mental states.

Some crucial characteristics of supervenience include:

It focuses on dependency but not reducibility.
It requires covariance between supervenient and subvenient properties.
It can apply to various domains such as ethics, mind, and science.

To better understand this, consider the analogy: changes in the surface pattern (paint) of a canvas depend on the canvas itself but understanding the pattern does not explain how the canvas is formed. Philosophically, supervenience helps in exploring questions of how things could be different (modalities) and how things are related across different levels of analysis (analysis of properties).

Supervenience: A metaphysical concept describing the dependency relationship between different sets of properties, where supervenient properties depend on subvenient properties, such that any change in the supervenient properties mandates a change in the subvenient properties.

Supervenience is used to show connections between the non-physical and physical without reducing one to the other.

Supervenience Theory

The theory of supervenience is pivotal to philosophy as it provides a framework for various analyses, especially concerning emergent phenomena and property relations. In simple terms, the theory suggests that if two worlds are identical concerning their physical properties, they will be identical concerning their supervenient properties, which can be non-physical like moral or aesthetic properties.

Different types of supervenience have been identified:

Weak Supervenience: A relationship that holds within possible worlds but not necessarily across different possible worlds.
Global Supervenience: A stronger claim where a change in at least one subvenient property leads to a change at the level of sets of properties, often at the scale of a possible world.
Strong Supervenience: Similar to weak supervenience but requires the property relations to hold across possible worlds.

Each version of supervenience helps philosophers examine different aspects of different debates such as the mind-body problem, determinism, and ethical objectivity.

An example of supervenience in ethics: consider moral properties, which are often thought to supervene on actions and events. If an action is morally wrong, this moral status is assumed to rest upon the particular physical aspects of the action. Thus, two actions with asphyxiatingly similar physical traits must correspondingly share moral judgments.

A fascinating dimension about supervenience relates to its application in psychology and philosophy of mind. Philosophers utilize the concept of supervenience to explore how mental phenomena could arise from physical processes without reducing consciousness purely to neural events. This exploration allows for a non-reductive explanation of consciousness, giving room for the mental to be more than just the physical, yet grounded in it.

Moreover, supervenience serves in cross-philosophical discussions, such as the laws of nature, where the idea suggests that lawful regularities in macro-events supervene on micro-events. Thus, while laws of nature may arise from the modal character of micro-events, they need not be reduced to them, preserving both unity and diversity among the phenomena.

Mind Body Supervenience

The concept of mind-body supervenience is essential in the philosophy of mind as it explores the dependency relations between mental and physical states. In this framework, the mental states of individuals, like beliefs and desires, are seen as dependent on and correlated to physical states, such as neural configurations.

Understanding Mind Body Supervenience

Mind-body supervenience addresses the relationship between our physical forms and our conscious experiences. When discussing this in philosophical terms, supervenience is used to explain how changes in physical states invariably lead to changes in mental states, but not necessarily vice versa. This asymmetrical relationship is crucial for understanding how the mind is linked to the body without asserting that mental states are merely physical ones.

Key ideas in mind-body supervenience often include:

The dependency of mental states on physical states.
No separate existence of the mind independent of the body.
Correlational rather than causal relations between brain and mind.

This concept is fundamental in determining how cognitive processes can be compatible with physicalism, the doctrine that all that exists is ultimately physical.

An example illustrating mind-body supervenience: consider two individuals in identical physical scenarios within identical environments. If one's pain experiences are different due to different brain configurations, then this suggests that the mental state of feeling pain supervenes on the individual’s particular brain state, affirming that pain cannot change without an alteration in the physical substrate.

Mind-body supervenience does not imply mind-body identity; rather, it highlights a dependency without asserting equivalence.

A deep dive into mind-body supervenience reveals profound implications for fields such as psychology, cognitive science, and artificial intelligence. By understanding mental states through the lens of supervenience, researchers can model how neurological phenomena give rise to complex mental processes without simplifying them merely to physical terms. This approach aids in deciphering consciousness, challenging the realms of dualism and encouraging a unified vision of human experience that accommodates the complexities of the mental world.

Mind-body supervenience also engages in dialogues with emergentism, arguing that mental events emerge from but are not reducible to brain functions. This dialogue is crucial for advancements in neuroscience and philosophical inquiries into the nature of consciousness.

Humean Supervenience

Humean supervenience is a critical idea in metaphysics, particularly in discussions involving the nature of reality and modal properties. This concept often relates to the broadly Humean view that all facts about the world, including laws of nature and metaphysical modalities, supervene on the actual distribution of particular events.

Framework of Humean Supervenience

Humean supervenience asserts that all there is to the world are particular matters of factual distribution, such as individual events or entities. Higher-order facts about laws or modalities are said to emerge from these base-level distributions. According to this principle, two universes that share the same history of particular matters of fact cannot differ in laws of nature or modal characteristics.

Key characteristics include:

Dependence of complex facts on simple ones.
The idea that the world consists entirely of local qualities.
Invariance of laws and modalities across possible worlds with the same distribution of particulars.

Humean supervenience often informs debates on the implications of determinism, as it suggests that what we perceive as universal laws are simply descriptive regularities of the arrangement of specific facts.

Humean Supervenience: The philosophical doctrine asserting that all facts, including laws of nature and modal facts, depend simply on the spatiotemporal distribution of local qualitative facts.

An example demonstrating Humean supervenience might involve considering two worlds with identical configurations of particles. In both worlds, despite potential differences in theoretical laws posited by observers, the laws must supervene on the same basic facts about particle locations and trajectories, making the worlds identical concerning laws.

Humean supervenience challenges the necessity of intrinsic laws by emphasizing descriptive, rather than prescriptive, nature.

Exploring deeper into Humean supervenience reveals fascinating implications for our understanding of scientific laws. Many debates center on whether laws of nature are intrinsic features or merely emergent descriptions. A Humean perspective suggests that laws are mere summaries of patterns found in particular events, removing any need for “spooky” metaphysical entities.

This view also impacts the understanding of modality, or the study of possibility and necessity. By claiming that modal facts supervene on factual distributions, Humean supervenience implies that possibilities are not independent realities but rather reflect potential configurations of facts.

Jaegwon Kim Supervenience

Jaegwon Kim is a prominent philosopher known for his work on the concept of supervenience, particularly in the context of the mind-body problem. His contributions to the field have been significant in framing how mental states relate to physical states.

Kim's Contribution to Supervenience

Jaegwon Kim has been instrumental in elaborating the idea of supervenience, especially focusing on its implications for the philosophy of mind. Kim's exploration of supervenience clarifies how it can be used to describe the dependence of mental properties on physical properties without implying a reduction of the mental to the physical. He introduces refined concepts of strong supervenience and weak supervenience, which help in differentiating the depth of dependency in relation to inter-world and intra-world scenarios.

According to Kim, the mental depends on the physical for its existence but maintains its ontological distinctiveness. This insight has profound implications for understanding consciousness and legitimizing non-reductive physicalism.

Strong Supervenience: A type of supervenience that requires that for any two objects (in all possible worlds) that are physically identical, they must be identical in their mental properties as well.

Kim's concept of supervenience can be illustrated with a simple example of color perception. Suppose two different apples with identical physical properties reflect light in the same manner. According to strong supervenience, individuals with normal vision observing these apples in identical conditions will perceive similar color sensations.

Kim's analysis often involves the use of philosophical thought experiments and logical reasoning to elucidate how supervenience functions in metaphysical discussions. By insisting on the necessary co-variation of properties across possible worlds, Kim opens the door to understanding how different forms of properties can coexist and relate.

Additionally, Kim challenges reductive approaches while promoting a view where mental properties, though dependent on the physical, are not just a mere byproduct but possess causal powers of their own. This nuance is mirrored in scenarios involving human behavior analysis: physical descriptions of brain activity must align with mental state experiences.

Diving deeper into Kim’s work unveils complex arguments surrounding mental causation and its relation to supervenience. One of Kim's key contentions is the exclusion principle, suggesting that if a physical state is sufficient to cause another physical state, there is no need for a separate mental cause. This raises intriguing discussions about how genuinely irreducible mental properties interact with a causally closed physical domain.

Kim introduces what is termed the ‘causal exclusion argument’, posing challenges to those who argue for mental causation in a non-reductive framework. This has catalyzed further dialogue in contemporary philosophy about the potential roles and powers of mental properties against physicalist paradigms.

supervenience - Key takeaways

Supervenience Definition: A metaphysical concept that describes the dependency relationship between supervenient properties and subvenient properties, requiring changes in the former to mandate changes in the latter.
Philosophical Analysis of Supervenience: Addresses how higher-level properties depend on but are not reducible to lower-level properties, important in exploring mind-body relations and other philosophical debates.
Mind-Body Supervenience: Discusses the dependency of mental states on physical states, highlighting correlational rather than causal relations between brain and mind without asserting identity.
Humean Supervenience: A doctrine asserting that all facts, including laws of nature, depend on the spatiotemporal distribution of local qualitative facts, emphasizing descriptive regularities.
Jaegwon Kim Supervenience: Kim's contribution focuses on strong and weak supervenience, explaining mental-physical dependency while preserving mental states' causal power.
Supervenience Theory: Provides a framework for analyzing emergent phenomena and property relations, suggesting identical physical worlds must have identical supervenient properties.

supervenience

StudySmarter Editorial Team