Anarcho-Capitalism

Anarchism and anarcho-capitalism

Anarchism, as we know, is a political ideology that rejects all forms of coercive authority and hierarchy, in favour of the organisation of society through voluntary participation. The rejection of the state lies at the centre of the anarchist tradition and all anarchists seek to abolish the state, which is seen as the principle form of coercive authority.

Beyond this, anarchists disagree on what organising system should be implemented. The answer to this question depends largely on which aspect or consequence of state power is seen as harmful, and for whom, as well as how one understands human nature.

Fig. 2 Yellow and black flag of anarcho-capitalism

The collectivist anarchist objection to the state, for example, is its nurturing of the capitalist system, which results in workers having to sell their labour in order to survive. As a result, collectivist anarchists' vision of a stateless society is one where labour has the capacity to be a liberating endeavour. Solutions tend to be cooperative and inclusive, with every member of society contributing to - and benefiting from - economic activity.

Individualist anarchists take quite a different view - their main objection to the state is that it restricts individual rights and liberties, including the right to private property and personal autonomy. Individualists view the free market as the ultimate expression of individuals working in concert, promoting the efficient exchange of goods, commodities and services. Individualists are not concerned with ensuring that all working members of society receive equal access to goods and services, believing instead that the free market offers all individuals the opportunity to access what they want or need.

Anarcho-capitalism, therefore, is an individualists form of anarchism. By promoting market equilibrium as the best alternative to state coercion, it denies the efficacy of communism, syndicalism, or any other form of collectivised social organisation, believing that they simply add new barriers to the flourishing of individuals.

Anarcho-capitalism ideology

Murray Rothbard, an American economist, first coined the term anarcho-capitalism in the mid-20th century. For Rothbard, anarcho-capitalism is the logical conclusion of the Non-Aggression Principle (NAP). The NAP is a libertarian principle that argues that every human is granted natural and inalienable rights, including the right to life, liberty and property. Any form of "aggression" against an individual or their property rights is fundamentally unacceptable, and as a result, the coercive state can have no place in a free world.

Rothbard argued that all functions of the state - including defence, law enforcement, and infrastructure - should be taken over by private companies operating within an unregulated free market. Competition between companies means that prices would be kept low, and the opportunity to earn profit would provide incentives for economic sectors to grow, as well as encourage technological innovation. Vulnerable groups, such as the elderly, would have their needs met by private charities rather than by state welfare systems.

Rothbard's argument that an unregulated free market is capable of meeting all of society's needs is based on assumptions about human nature which are also present in individualist anarchist thought. Individualism is based on the idea that human beings are fundamentally autonomous and rational, which means that - when freed from the constraints of a state system - they are capable of making sensible decisions about the course of their own lives.

Fig. 3 Murray Rothbard vector and signature

Rothbard elaborated on these ideas, arguing that the principle of autonomy could be understood as 'self-ownership'. Each individual 'owns' their own body, life and all its contents as one might own a house or piece of land. Rothbart also argued that self-interest is a natural part of the human condition, and came about through evolution as a way to ensure that human beings met their basic needs for food, shelter and warmth. It is this innate self-interest, Rothbard argues, that makes capitalism the most desirable form of social organisation.

What would an anarcho-capitalist society look like?

A society run according to anarcho-capitalist principles would be one based on the equilibrium of the free market. This equilibrium would emerge as individuals have an obvious self-interest in avoiding disaster or instability. Rothbard envisaged a society that would function according to a mutually-agreed legal code which would acknowledge private contracts between individuals, the right to private property and the principle of self-ownership in line with the Non-Aggression Principle.

All interactions would be governed by contracts, replacing the need for any form of state authority. In an anarcho-capitalist society, voluntary agreement via contracts is fundamental to the exercise of liberty, and there is no coercion from any authority beyond the scope of contracts agreed by individuals.

Complete de-regulation, therefore, would have a profound impact on society. Essential services would be provided by private companies with individuals purchasing their services from their own resources. Private property would be protected by insurance companies, who would act as the police and courts, enforcing property rights by force if necessary. Infrastructure would also be privatised, and subject to competition on the free market, with consumers offered a choice of which roads, trains or buses to use.

Anarcho-capitalism criticism

Anarcho-capitalism has been criticised by other anarchists, many of whom believe it isn't a form of anarchism at all. This criticism stems from anarcho-capitalism's acceptance of free-market capitalism, which most anarchists seek to overthrow, together with the state. As noted above, collectivist anarchists reject the idea that capitalism and anarchism are reconcilable ideologies. They argue that, within the anarcho-capitalist vision, the oppressive structures of the state are simply replicated.

Many anarchists, then, would actually view anarcho-capitalism as a form of libertarianism. Most libertarians accept that some minimal form of state control needs to exist, however, to maintain order in society. This model of the state was developed by John Locke, who labelled the ideal as a 'Night Watchman', which only intervenes in order to protect its citizens theft, deprivation of property, or physical harm. For libertarian critics of anarcho-capitalism, the removal of the 'Night Watchman' paves the way for a whole range of horrific practices to become possible within the context of an unregulated free market.

For instance, an individual could sell themselves or another person into slavery out of desperation or in a moment of mental incapacity. Provided both parties had signed a contract, the seller would be unable to reverse their decision, and the buyer would be able to enforce it. In this scenario, there is no impartial third party to represent the interests of the enslaved person, since the only law enforcement agencies are private enterprises paid to represent the interests of their client.

Anarcho-Capitalism books

Anarcho-capitalist theory has been influenced by many intellectuals and their most famous books, particularly throughout the 20th century.

Murray Rothbard, Anatomy of the State

In his book Anatomy of the State (1974), Rothbard launches a critique of the state in order to develop an argument for the establishment of a stateless free market system. For Rothbard, the state fundamentally undermines the ability of individuals to achieve sustained prosperity. Rothbard's ideas are comprised of an amalgamation of individual anarchist thought and free-market economics.

David Friedman, The Machinery of Freedom

Published in 1971, American economist David Friedman's book The Machinery of Freedom outlines his version of an anarcho-capitalist society. Friedman's vision of an anarcho-capitalist society is one in which all services would be provided through the free market system, and in this text he heavily critiques the US judicial system, as well as the welfare state.

The way to achieve anarcho-capitalism, according to Friedman, is through an increase in the privatisation of sectors. Unlike the philosophical libertarian Rothbard, Friedman's promotion of an anarcho-capitalist society rests on a cost-benefit analysis of an anarcho-capitalist society as opposed to the assumption that it is the natural right of an individual to be without state coercion.

Albert Jay Nock, Our Enemy, the State

Taking formation as a collection of lectures delivered by Albert Nock, Our Enemy, the State was published in 1935. In it, Nock critiques the federal government of the US arguing that the government seeks to accumulate more power and wealth at the expense of individuals at every possible opportunity. Nock's criticism of state power is influenced heavily by the emergence of the New Deal which, according to Nock, was merely a way for the government to further tighten its grip on society and the economy. Whilst Nock is viewed as an influential libertarian thinker, his writings over time became increasingly anti-Semitic which has caused him to be looked on unfavourably by subsequent generations of critics and theorists.