Explanations 
Flashcards 
StudySmarter AI 
Notes 
Study Plans 
Study Sets 
Exams 
Magazine 
Find a job 
Mobile App 
Jump to a key chapter
Understanding Ethical Decision-Making Models in Forensic Psychology
In the fascinating field of forensic psychology, ethical decision-making models play a vital role. These models guide professionals through challenging dilemmas, ensuring their choices not only uphold professional standards but also benefit individuals and society. In this complex field where law and psychology intersect, the significance of ethical decision-making cannot be understated.
Definition: Ethical Decision Making Model
An ethical decision-making model is a structured method used by individuals or teams to make decisions based on ethical reasoning. These models provide a logical and step-wise approach to navigate through ethical dilemmas, enabling considerations of moral issues along with practical aspects of decision making.
In forensic psychology, these models hold a paramount position as they guide professionals in balancing the demanding and at times competing interests of the legal system, professional ethics, and patient welfare. Understanding these models can enhance ethical awareness, promote sound judgement, and foster optimal professional conduct.
- Identify the issue or problem
- Collect information and evaluate options
- Consider ethical principles and professional code of conduct
- Make a decision and take action
- Review the decision and its outcome
It is worth noting that these models are not fool-proof. While they offer a structured approach to decision making, the outcomes are still reliant upon the integrity, wisdom, and competence of the practitioners employing them.
Ethical Decision Making Model Example in Forensic Psychology
Here's an illustrative scenario: A forensic psychologist is called upon to assess the credibility of abuse allegations in a contentious child custody case. On one hand, the psychologist's responsibility towards the court demands an unvarnished evaluation. On the other, the welfare of the child and ethical duties to minimize any potential harm from assessment processes necessitate a delicate navigation of the situation.
This quandary would initiate the ethical decision-making model:
| Identification of the Dilemma | Objective assessment vs. Child's welfare |
| Information Gathering | Details about the case, standards of assessment processes, potential repercussions on the child |
| Evaluation of Options | Consultation with peers/supervisors, alternative assessment methods |
| Application of Ethical Principles | Non-maleficence, Fairness, Professional Competency |
| Action and Review | Perform assessment, seek supervision, review decision and outcome |
By following such a model, a forensic psychologist can hope to reconcile the intricate, often competing demands of this profession, fostering decisions that are ethically sound, legally compliant, and most importantly, in the interests of individuals and society.
Four Component Model of Ethical Decision Making: A Deep Dive
An in-depth examination of the Four Component Model of Ethical Decision Making is quite revealing. This model, developed by James Rest, is favoured in many professional fields, including forensic psychology, due to its comprehensive structure. It does not merely prescribe a linear process for decision making, but it also encapsulates the psyche's deeper layers, explaining the role of an individual’s moral sensitivity, judgement, character, and courage in making ethical decisions.
Understanding the Four Component Model of Ethical Decision Making in Detail
Moral Sensitivity (Recognition): The Four Component Model initiates its decision-making pathway with moral sensitivity. It is an individual's ability to recognise that a problem exists and that this problem has moral implications. It's the genesis, the awareness stage, where professionals recognise the potential for ethical consequences emerging from the situation at hand.
Moral Judgement (Reasoning): The next step, moral judgement, arrives once an ethical issue is identified. Here, reasoning comes into play as professionals must consider all possible options and their potential outcomes. They contemplate, weigh, and evaluate these choices using their moral understanding and ethical codes of conduct.
Moral Motivation (Prioritisation): With potential options evaluated, the person is now faced with the challenge of prioritising. They must decide which aspects hold the greatest weight. Is it regulations, client welfare, personal values, or societal norms? Moral motivation is the driving force that prioritises ethical duties above other professional and personal motives.
Moral Character (Action): The final step in this model involves action. The professional, armed with sensitivity, judgement, and motivation, now acts upon the chosen decision. This step requires not just a firm decision but also the strength and courage to withstand opposition and difficulties that might arise.
Examples of Four Component Model of Ethical Decision Making in Practice
Four Component Model in Action: Here's a scenario to bring this theoretical model to life. A psychologist is evaluating a high-profile criminal charged with a violent crime. The criminal demonstrates clear signs of a personality disorder, but the psychologist is under significant pressure from a public desire for harsh punishment.
| Moral Sensitivity | Realising the ethical implications surrounding the prognosis of a personality disorder in a high-profile case. |
| Moral Judgement | Evaluating options such as referring to another expert, adhering strictly to professional guidelines, or succumbing to societal pressure. |
| Moral Motivation | Deciding to uphold professional responsibility and making the priority to report accurate professional findings, irrespective of public opinion. |
| Moral Character | Executing the decision with courage, reporting the evaluation results based purely on professional findings and the individual’s mental health condition. |
Such an example provides practical insight into how this model can work in real-life scenarios, making it possible to navigate complex ethical dilemmas in a structured, reasoned and principled manner.
Fisher's Ethical Decision Making Model Explained
When it comes to the field of psychology and making ethical decisions, Fisher's Ethical Decision Making Model holds a prime position. This model, created by renowned psychologist Celia B. Fisher, provides valuable guidance to practitioners to navigate multifaceted ethical dilemmas.
Overview: Fisher's Ethical Decision Making Model
Fisher's Ethical Decision Making Model is based on the principle that ethical decision-making in psychology isn’t just a cognitive process, but it's also about active engagement. Fisher’s model grounds itself on seven crucial steps which are more than just a list; they are a series of investigative and analytical processes that embody the dynamism of real-world scenarios.
- Recognise that the situation contains ethical components.
- Identifying what elements of the scenario hold ethical implications.
- Formulating an ethical course of action by consulting established professional standards.
- Deliberating and weighing foreseeable risks and benefits of potential actions.
- Choosing the course of action that minimises harm and maximises benefits, while being mindful of the ethical standards.
- Implementing the selected action.
- Reflecting on the outcome, reassessing the situation and adjusting the course of action if necessary.
In Fisher’s ethical decision-making model, the individual or group making the decisions calls upon their knowledge, experience, values system, and professional codes, drawing them together into a constructive solution. Its potency lies in its adaptability and applicability to diverse and complex ethical issues.
Fisher's Ethical Decision Making Model: Real-World Applications in Psychology
Fisher's model comes alive when applied to real-world scenarios within psychology. Its structured yet sensitive path serves psychologists navigating through the labyrinth of human sufferings, behavioural unpredictabilities, and societal demands.
Imagine a clinical psychologist working in a war zone where they are dealing with cases of severe trauma. Simultaneously, they must negotiate various limitations – from lack of resources to cultural barriers. To add to the complexity, a non-governmental organisation funding the operations has requested for data from patients for research purposes.
This conundrum involves multiple ethical dimensions – from client welfare to confidentiality to professional boundaries – making it an excellent candidate for Fisher's model:
| Recognition of Ethical Issues | Identifying the ethical turbulence triggered by patient data sharing. |
| Identification of Ethical Elements | Recognising issues such as informed consent, confidentiality, and balancing roles. |
| Formulation of Ethical Routes | Exploring options like rejecting data sharing, anonymising data, or soliciting informed consent. |
| Deliberation of Benefits and Risks | Assessing risks versus benefits for the client, psychologist, NGO, and research objectives. |
| Selection of Ethical Action | Choosing to adopt a transparent approach, discuss with patients and use anonymised data if consent is granted. |
| Action Implementation | Executing the decision by engaging clients in discussions and obtaining written consents. |
| Reflection | Reviewing the action, its outcome, and making adaptations if necessary. |
The takeaway from this model is its practicality and adaptability, readily embracing the complex nature and unpredictable circumstances that psychology professionals grapple with. It empowers them with a decision-making strategy that respects both the complexity of ethical issues and the need for clear professional accountability.
Principles of Ethical Decision Making in Psychology
Psychology, as a field dealing with human behaviour and mental processes, often encounters intricate ethical dilemmas that require judicious decision-making. These decisions are guided by certain foundational principles. These principles help ensure that psychologists' actions remain within the bounds of professional ethics while ensuring the welfare of their clients and society.
The Core Principles of Ethical Decision Making in Psychology
In the practice of psychology, ethical decision-making revolves around five core principles. These bedrock principles form the foundation of all ethical guidelines and models followed by psychologists.
- Beneficence and Non-maleficence: Based on the universal ethical maxim, "Do good and do no harm,", these twin principles emphasise the psychologist's responsibility for promoting the wellbeing of clients and preventing any harm to them. Every decision made, from clinical treatment to research design, must prioritise the welfare and minimise harm to the individual and society.
- Fidelity and Responsibility: With knowledge comes responsibility. Psychologists are responsible for establishing and maintaining trust with their clients and society. Stewardship of their skills, knowledge, and trust given to them is paramount. They must cultivate professional and responsible behaviour, respect professional ethical guidelines, and aim for personal growth and development.
- Integrity: Honesty, transparency, and truthfulness form the backbone of this principle. Deception, unless necessary and with proper consents, is considered a breach of this principle. It becomes crucial that psychologists strive to promote accuracy, honesty, and truthfulness in the science, teaching, and practice of psychology.
- Justice: This principle upholds the tenet of fairness and justice — psychologists must strive to ensure that all individuals are given equal quality and standards of services, irrespective of their background. It also involves the fair distribution of resources and benefits, ensuring nobody gets deprived of deserved advantages or unjustly burdened.
- Respect for People's Rights and Dignity: Respect for the fundamental rights, dignity, and worth of all people is at the core of this principle. Psychologists are expected to respect the autonomy of their clients and uphold their rights to privacy and confidentiality. Special respect must be given to the rights of populations that are vulnerable or dependent.
To sum up, these principles establish the moral compass that guides psychologists through the labyrinth of ethical dilemmas in their practice, ensuring their actions contribute positively to individuals and society while adhering to professional standards.
Practical Applications of Principles of Ethical Decision Making in Psychology
These principles are not nebulous moral guidelines but practical tenets that psychologists apply in their work. To illustrate, let's delve into real-world applications of these principles:
Beneficence and Non-maleficence: A therapist dealing with a child with behavioural issues uses only ethically approved therapeutic interventions, avoiding any methods that might cause harm. When deciding treatments, the therapist prioritises those that have proven benefits and minimal negative side effects.
Fidelity and Responsibility: A forensic psychologist, while testifying in court, makes sure her testimony is evidence-based, and she actively prevents any personal biases from affecting her judgement. This reflects the principle of responsibility, where the psychologist understands and acts upon their duty towards the legal system.
Integrity: A researcher conducting a study on addiction ensures that the participants are fully informed of all aspects of the study. No deception is employed, and results are reported accurately without any manipulation, exemplifying the principle of integrity in action.
Justice: A school counselor, serving in a multicultural school, takes extra efforts to provide equal quality of counseling to all students, regardless of their cultural or economic background. This is a clear application of the justice principle, promoting fairness and equality in psychological services.
Respect for People's Rights and Dignity: In a mental health clinic serving elderly clients, psychologists ensure that they obtain informed consent before any assessments or treatments. They respect the autonomy and privacy rights of the elderly and handle sensitive information with utmost confidentiality, thereby upholding the principle of respect for people's rights and dignity.
These examples illustrate how the principles of ethical decision making hold practical relevance in the everyday practice of psychology. They guide psychologists in their professional journeys, helping them navigate ethical dilemmas, make sound decisions, and foster a positive impact on their clients and society.
Ethical Decision-Making Models - Key takeaways
- Ethical Decision-Making Models provide a logical, step-by-step approach to navigate ethical dilemmas, combining moral issues with practical decision making aspects.
- Forensic psychology particularly benefits from these models, as they aid in balancing competing interests of legal system, professional ethics, and patient welfare.
- The Ethical Decision Making Model generally consists of five steps: identifying the problem, collecting information, considering ethical principles and professional conduct, making a decision, and reviewing the decision and its outcome.
- The Four Component Model of Ethical Decision Making, developed by James Rest, includes four aspects: moral sensitivity, moral judgement, moral motivation, and moral character.
- Fisher's Ethical Decision Making Model, developed by psychologist Celia B. Fisher, emphasizes that ethical decision-making in psychology isn’t only a cognitive process but also requires active engagement. This model follows seven crucial steps, starting from recognising ethical components of a situation to reflecting on the outcome and readjusting if necessary.
- The Five Core Principles of Ethical Decision Making in Psychology are Beneficence and Non-maleficence, Fidelity and Responsibility, Integrity, Justice, and Respect for People's Rights and Dignity.
Learn faster with the 12 flashcards about Ethical Decision-Making Models
Sign up for free to gain access to all our flashcards.
Frequently Asked Questions about Ethical Decision-Making Models
About StudySmarter
StudySmarter is a globally recognized educational technology company, offering a holistic learning platform designed for students of all ages and educational levels. Our platform provides learning support for a wide range of subjects, including STEM, Social Sciences, and Languages and also helps students to successfully master various tests and exams worldwide, such as GCSE, A Level, SAT, ACT, Abitur, and more. We offer an extensive library of learning materials, including interactive flashcards, comprehensive textbook solutions, and detailed explanations. The cutting-edge technology and tools we provide help students create their own learning materials. StudySmarter’s content is not only expert-verified but also regularly updated to ensure accuracy and relevance.
Learn more