Idiographic and Nomothetic Approaches

Idiographic vs Nomothetic Approach

The nomothetic approach describes the study of people as a total population and uses quantitative research methods. In contrast, the idiographic approach describes the study of the individual and uses qualitative methods. The nomothetic approach studies large groups to formulate laws and generalise behaviour to the population. The idiographic approach does not formulate laws or generalise findings.

• Research methods used in the nomothetic approach include experiments, correlations, and meta-analyses.
• Research methods used in the idiographic approach include unstructured interviews, case studies, and thematic analysis.

The idiographic approach focuses on individual perceptions and feelings and collects qualitative data to obtain in-depth and unique details about individuals instead of numerical data.

The Difference Between the Idiographic and Nomothetic Approach

The idiographic approach emphasises the uniqueness of the individual through their emotions, behaviour, and experiences. It aims to gather in-depth information about a person. On the other hand, the nomothetic approach aims to find the commonalities among people and tries to generalise behaviour through laws that apply to all.

Cognitive psychology approaches combine both methods. They use a nomothetic approach to establish general laws of cognitive process and apply an idiographic approach to work on case studies.

Idiographic and Nomothetic Approach: Examples

Here are some examples of idiographic and nomothetic approaches to get a good grip on the topic at hand.

The Biological Approach: Nomothetic

The biological approach is an example of a nomothetic approach in psychology.

The theories proposed by the biological approach are often ascribed to everyone afterwards and can thus be considered nomothetic.

Classical and Operant Conditioning: Nomothetic

Operant conditioning of behaviour is an excellent example of a nomothetic approach. When Pavlov and Skinner conducted their research with rats, dogs, and pigeons to test learning behaviours, they developed general laws of learning classical and operant conditioning.

Watson also generalised these laws and applied them to humans. They are still used in behavioural therapies for phobias, systematic desensitisation, and other problems.

Conformity, Obedience, and Situational Factors: Nomothetic

Social psychologists Asch and Milgram argue that situational factors are another nomothetic approach. When they conducted research to understand the situational factors involved in social behaviour, they concluded that situational factors could influence the degree of conformity and obedience to anyone because they apply a general law.

Humanistic and Psychodynamic Approach: Idiographic

Humanistic psychology and the psychodynamic approach are good examples of idiographic methodology. Humanistic psychology applies a person-centred approach. Therefore, it is considered idiographic because it promotes a focus exclusively on subjective experience. It is usually used in a clinical setting because it focuses on the individual.

The psychodynamic approach also has nomothetic components, as seen in Freud's discussion on the stages of development everyone goes through. However, the case studies Freud used show the idiographic aspects of his theories.

Fig. 2 - The psychodynamic approach has nomothetic and idiographic aspects.

Little Hans: Oedipus Complex

Freud's (1909) case study of Little Hans is an example of an idiographic approach. Freud conducted meticulous research on his patients' cases to understand their psychological problems better. The case study of Little Hans is about a five-year-old boy who was afraid of horses.

Freud collected detailed data that spanned over one hundred and fifty pages and months of work. He concluded that Little Hans behaved this way out of jealousy of his father because Freud believed that Little Hans was going through the Oedipus complex.

Nomothetic and Idiographic Approaches to Psychology

Let’s take a look at the study of personality through the lens of the nomothetic and idiographic approaches. A nomothetic approach would understand personality in terms of a few basic traits that can be generalised and applied to everyone.

An idiographic approach understands personality through the lens of every individual’s unique experiences and history. As you can imagine, this creates an endless number of possible personality traits. As such, it is impossible to measure these qualities through standardized testing.

Idiographic and Nomothetic Approach: Evaluation

This section will compare and contrast the idiographic to the nomothetic approach to show the strengths and weaknesses.

Advantages of a Nomothetic Approach

Using the nomothetic approach, large samples of individuals can be used to obtain representative results. It also uses a scientific methodology to make experiments replicable and reliable. Laboratory experiments are controlled and scientifically robust, usually.

Since this approach is scientific, it can be used to predict behaviour and provide treatment plans based on biological abnormalities.

Disadvantages of a Nomothetic Approach

However, the nomothetic approach lacks awareness of individual and unique perspectives because it assumes that universal laws of behaviour apply to everyone. Likewise, cultural and gender differences may not be considered in nomothetic methods.

Most experiments are conducted in a laboratory. Therefore, results may lack realism and ecological validity; these studies may not apply to real-world circumstances.

Advantages of an Idiographic Approach

The idiographic approach focuses on individuals and can explain behaviour more deeply. Humanistic psychologists argue that we can only predict their actions at a given moment if we know the person. The results are a source of ideas or hypotheses for the studies.

Case studies can help develop nomothetic laws by providing more information.

Disadvantages of an Idiographic Approach

Idiographic methods lack scientific evidence. Since fewer people are studied, no general laws or predictions can be made. Because of this, it is often seen as a narrow and limited approach.

Modern scientific standards often dismiss Freud's theories for methodology issues and a lack of scientific basis.