What is the significance of 'Young 2007' in the field of psychology?

'Young 2007' is significant in psychology as it introduced the concept of Online Disinhibition Effect. This underlines the distinct behavioural changes individuals exhibit when communicating online versus in-person, including lowered inhibitions and increased self-disclosure.

How has 'Young 2007' influenced modern psychological research and treatment methods?

'Young 2007' has significantly influenced modern psychological research and treatment methods by introducing the concept of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for internet addiction. It has highlighted the importance of addressing internet addiction in clinical practice and altered the approach to treating behavioural addictions.

What are the main findings and conclusions of the 'Young 2007' study in psychology?

The 'Young 2007' study concluded that internet addiction can be categorised as an impulse control disorder. It found that individuals with internet addiction exhibited signs of preoccupation, withdrawal symptoms, and unsuccessful attempts to control use. This dependency led to significant issues in everyday functioning.

What psychological theories or models were proposed or supported by the 'Young 2007' research?

The 'Young 2007' research proposed and supported the Cognitive-Behavioural Model of pathological Internet use, which is also known as Internet addiction.

What methods of research were utilised in the 'Young 2007' study in psychology?

The 'Young 2007' study in psychology utilised a mixed method research approach, including both quantitative methods, such as the use of surveys and structured interviews, and qualitative methods, like unstructured interviews and direct observation.

What was the main focus of Young's 2007 study in the field of psychology?

Young's 2007 study was focused on investigating how social context, involving interactions with peers, societal norms, and familial expectations, influence individual behaviour.

What are societal norms according to Young 2007's study in psychology?

Societal norms refer to explicit or implicit rules established by a group that outline acceptable behaviours, values, and beliefs for its members.

Young 2007: Psychology Study & Procedure

Young 2007

Dive into the realm of psychology by understanding 'Young 2007', an influential study shaping modern psychological theories and methodologies. Unravel the historical background, key contributors, and detailed procedure of Young's seminal research. With further exploration of its findings, interpretation, and real-life implications, you'll gain a thorough grasp on this cornerstone of psychology. This insightful journey into 'Young 2007' is essential for anyone seeking in-depth knowledge about the world of psychology.

Get started

Understanding Young 2007 in the Social Context of Behaviour

The field of psychology provides a kaleidoscope of insights into human behaviour, illuminating patterns, motivations and reactions that are distinctive, innate and learned. A key study that advanced our understanding of this complex field is by Young in 2007, which put a spotlight on the social context of behaviour.

Historical Background: Exploring Young Psychology Research 2007

Young 2007 provides a vital link in the historical chain of psychological research, marking a significant path of inquiry into the social context of behaviour. It represents an important juncture in the field, particularly in social psychology and behavioural studies.

Social context refers to the immediate physical and social setting in which people live or in which something happens or develops. It includes the culture that the individual was educated or lives in, and the people and institutions with whom they interact.

Studying human behaviour in the social context means examining more than individuals' actions; it means exploring how social structures, roles, and expectations affect and shape those behaviours. The Young 2007 research delves into these dimensions, making it a landmark study in the field.

Key Contributors to Young 2007 Study

Young, as the principal investigator, is the primary contributor to the 2007 study. However, a research project of this magnitude often involves a team of researchers and collaborators.

Additional researchers that contributed significantly to the study remain anonymous in the research. Their contributions were invaluable to the rich insights that the Young 2007 study offers.

Deconstructing the Young 2007 Procedure

Understanding the Young 2007 procedure requires decoding the series of rigorous steps and methodologies employed in the study. The process is a testament to the scientific thoroughness and ethical standards characteristic of the field of psychology.

Steps and Methodology in Young 2007 Research

Young's 2007 research was a series of systematic steps designed to investigate behaviour within social contexts. The goal was to underline key factors and highlight the dominant motivations and patterns that shape human responses in such situations.

Selection of the sample: A diverse and representative sample of individuals was selected.
Application of measures: Measuring instruments developed and validated by previous research were used.
Statistical analysis: Rigorous statistical techniques were applied to interpret the data.

For instance, Young may have used a mix of qualitative and quantitative research methods, including interviews and questionnaires to gather data, followed by intricate statistical analyses to interpret it. The findings were then framed within the context of existing theories and research in psychology.

Theoretical Underpinnings of Young 2007 Procedure

The Young 2007 research procedure has strong theoretical roots. It is based on established principles of social and behavioural psychology and is influenced by various theories. Exploring these theoretical underpinnings is crucial to understanding the study's objectives and outcomes.

Theoretical underpinning refers to the theories that form the basis for a method or procedure. It is like a foundation on which the entire structure (the study, in this case) is built.

Table 1: Theories informing the Young 2007 study:

Theory	Description
Social Role Theory	Explores how the social roles that individuals occupy shape their behaviour.
Social Identity Theory	Examines how individuals' identities in social groups affect their behaviours and attitudes.
Behavioural Theory	Focuses on how behaviours are learned through interactions with the environment.

The exploration of these theoretical bases gives richness to the Young 2007 study and enhances its applicability and relevance in understanding human behaviour in social contexts.

Breaking Down Young 2007 Findings

Young's 2007 study is monumental in the field of psychology, presenting a detailed examination of behaviour within the social context. To truly comprehend the extent of its contribution, it's vital to unlock and interpret its key findings.

Interpretation of Young 2007 Findings

The findings of Young 2007 drew a vivid picture of the interplay between behaviour and social context. They provided a comprehensive understanding of how social structures, roles, and expectations impinge upon, mould, and guide individuals' behaviour. These results have subsequently informed a wide range of disciplines, from clinical psychology to sociology, education, and beyond.

Interpreting findings in psychological research often involves translating raw data into meaningful conclusions. It necessitates cross-referencing with already established theories, recognising patterns, and explaining anomalies.

Compiling findings from the research, Young 2007 underscored the prominent role of social factors as determinants of behaviour. Interactions with peers, societal norms, familial expectations, all were identified as significantly shaping individuals' behavioural responses. These findings elucidated the complex interaction of individual tendencies and societal influences, providing a holistic perspective on behaviour within the social context.

Critiques and Responses to Young 2007 Findings

Though Young 2007 bridge significant gaps in our understanding of social behaviours, it invited varied responses from the academic community, leading to a rich tapestry of critiques, endorsements, and further questions.

Some praised the study for its comprehensive approach to social behaviour, noting that it addressed previously overlooked factors.
Others felt that the research could be limited by varying cultural understandings of social contexts.
Some argued that individual psychological factors were overshadowed and needed more attention within the study.

Nonetheless, these critiques have helped to refine the area of research, shining a light on areas for further exploration, and strengthening the robustness of understanding in the social context of behaviour.

For instance, a critique raised could lead to a subsequent study that investigates how individual factors such as personality traits interact with societal influences in shaping behaviour.

What is Young 2007: A Simplified Overview

Engaging with complex studies like Young 2007 can be daunting. To make the content accessible to a broader audience, a simplified overview is necessary. In this section, we'll stream-line the concepts and findings of Young 2007, for you.

Here, at its core, Young 2007 is about understanding why people act the way they do in different social settings. The study observed people’s behaviour and noted how external elements like surrounding people, societal norms, and cultural expectations influenced their actions.

If you imagine yourself as a part of this study, researchers would look at how you behave during a family gathering, at work, or even when you’re out shopping. They wouldn't just record what you do but would try to see if there are any patterns and if these patterns are influenced by the people and expectations around you.

In a nutshell, Young 2007 brought into focus the impact of society on our behaviour. It zoomed in on the invisible threads of norms, roles, and expectations tying us all, guiding our actions, sometimes subtly and other times profoundly.

societal norms refer to the implicit or explicit rules a group has established for the acceptable behaviours, values, and beliefs of its members.

Remember, psychology isn’t just about what is happening inside your head. It’s also about what’s happening around you, and Young 2007 helped us understand just that.

Examples of Young 2007 in Real Life

Understanding the practical applications of psychological studies deepens our appreciation for their value. Young 2007 is far from being a mere academic exercise. Its findings have tangible real-life implications, influencing how we analyse day-to-day human behaviour. Let's delve into a few examples of Young 2007 in real life.

Case Analysis: Young 2007 Study in Practice

A case analysis takes the theory from a research study and applies it to a specific situation or example, providing practical perspective on the theoretical findings.

Consider the daily commute. Individuals display a range of behaviours as they navigate their way to work, school, or other destinations. These behaviours largely vary depending on the social context. Let's spotlight two scenarios for this case analysis: using public transport and driving a car.

When using public transport, the dynamics of this social context require individuals to adjust their behaviour according to the norms and expectations of this setting. They queue patiently to board, offer their seat to elderly passengers, avoid loud personal conversations, and keep their belongings organised.

In contrast, when driving their own car, individuals’ behaviour can differ greatly. Singing along to the radio and making personal phone calls (hands-free and within legal limits, of course) are not behaviours that are typically endorsed in a public transport context, but are considered quite normal in the personal space of one's car.

The insights derived from Young 2007 shed light on these behavioural adaptations to different social contexts. Through this lens, the morning commute goes beyond mere travel from one location to another; it unravels as a rich intermix of behavioural responses to shifting social environments.

Implications of Young 2007 Findings in Current Day Psychology

The findings from Young 2007 have far-reaching implications, shaping various fronts of current-day psychological research and practice.

Implications in research refer to the likely effects of a given study’s findings on future research, in turn influencing practical applications within the respective field.

Clinical psychology: Young 2007 findings can help clinicians better understand their patient's behaviour in the light of social contexts and norms.
Organisational behaviour: In organisations, the study's inputs can streamline policies around group dynamics, team behaviour, and employee engagement.
Education: For educators, being cognisant of the social contexts affecting student behaviour could help shape more enriched, context-responsive teaching methods.

Table 1: Impact of Young 2007 findings on various psychology subfields:

Subfield	Impact
Clinical Psychology	Enhances understanding of clients' social context impacting their behaviour, enabling better diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Organisational Behaviour	Improves management techniques by considering employee behaviour in the light of their social backgrounds and networks.
Education	Shapes curriculum and teaching strategies by taking students' social context into account.

By studying the legacy of Young 2007 in contemporary psychology, we underscore its enduring relevance and pinnacle role in the academy and beyond. Young's expedition into the social context of human behaviour continues to mould our understanding and intrigues our curiosity today, making it a benchmark study in the psychology archives.

Interestingly, the implications of Young 2007 are not confined to psychology but are being explored in other disciplines like sociology, anthropology, and even in facets of marketing and organisational development, marking its truly interdisciplinary contribution.

Young 2007 - Key takeaways

'Young 2007' is an influential study in psychology focusing on the social context of behaviour, shedding light on how social structures, roles, and expectations shape human behaviour.
Key steps in the Young 2007 procedure involved the selection of diverse sample, application of measures using previous research, and the use of rigorous statistical techniques for data interpretation.
The study was based on several theories including Social Role Theory, Social Identity Theory and Behavioral Theory; these theoretical underpinnings form the basis of its methodologies and outcomes.
Findings from Young 2007 highlighted the significant role of social factors as determinants of behaviour, including interactions with peers, societal norms, and familial expectations.
Young 2007 has wide-reaching implications in various fields including clinical psychology, organizational behavior, and education, aiding in understanding and shaping behavior in respective social contexts.

Young 2007

StudySmarter Editorial Team

Understanding Young 2007 in the Social Context of Behaviour