Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Millions of flashcards designed to help you ace your studies
Sign up for freeReligion's basis is faith. True or false?
What did William Bainbridge argue?
Which of the following did Merton (1973) claim?
Which of these is the definition of universalism?
Finish the sentence: 'Anthony Giddens argues that science is becoming more and more significant in people's lives, but this is not because of the decline of religion. It is due to the decrease in...'
Religion's basis is faith. True or false?
What did William Bainbridge argue?
Which of the following did Merton (1973) claim?
Which of these is the definition of universalism?
Finish the sentence: 'Anthony Giddens argues that science is becoming more and more significant in people's lives, but this is not because of the decline of religion. It is due to the decrease in...'
Achieve better grades quicker with Premium
Geld-zurück-Garantie, wenn du durch die Prüfung fällst
Review generated flashcards
Start learning or create your own AI flashcards
Team Science and Religion Teachers
According to some beliefs, the two cannot coexist with each other, people choose either one or the other. There have, however, always been scientists who believed in God and religious individuals who supported the development of sciences. We will look at what sociologists hold of the two in relation to each other.
Some sociologists see a clear conflict between science and religion, while others believe in a more compatible relationship between science and religious belief. Karl Popper argues that science is an open belief system based on empirical data collection, continuous criticism and value freedom.
Traditional religions are usually closed belief systems with absolute truths based on God's words, recorded in ancient texts, rather than on experiments and questioning.
The table below displays the contrasting characteristics of science and religion, respectively.
Science | Religion |
The main concern of science is the physical, while religion focuses on the supernatural world. | |
|
|
Science is an open belief system, while religious beliefs represent a closed one. | |
|
|
The scientific knowledge system is ever-evolving, while religious belief is based on an absolute knowledge system. | |
|
|
Scientists aim to be objective and value-free, while religion is a highly subjective belief system. | |
|
|
Science tries to remain independent of government and state, while religions have historically been, and often still are, closely linked to the state. | |
Table 1 - Differences between science and religion.
Many sociologists, like William Bainbridge (1997), argue that the relationship between science and religion is complex and cannot be explained simply by stating that they stand in opposition to each other. There have been developments and changes in both areas that made them seem more compatible than before.
Religious pluralism and diversity: Some religious subgroups are not as strict about the scripture and dogmas of ancient texts any more. They are open to new ideas both from religion and science. Many changes have happened within traditional religions, which suggests that religions overall can evolve as well. Theology has always had different strands.
New religious movements and New Age movements are more compatible with science than conservative, fundamentalist religions.
Scientists such as Stephen Jay Gould (1999) claim that science and religion are compatible because they deal with different areas of life that do not overlap and can exist side by side.
Science aims to define the evolution and the laws of nature.
Religion is set to define the meaning of life and provide moral guidance and psychological relief.
Deism: According to deists, God created the universe, but then it evolved on its own. Scientists can discover what the workings and laws of this God-created universe are.
Some religions use science as a foundation for their theories.
Scientology, for example, developed the E-meter, which is said to track people’s spiritual progress. However, its validity is questioned.
The existence of scientific paradigms, like gravity, suggests that there are also fundamental, closed rules in science.
Fig. 1 - New Age movements are more compatible with science than traditional religions, according to some sociologists.
Though some theorists argue that science is open and critical, science historian Thomas Kuhn (1957) points out that scientific 'facts' proven in well-established fields, e.g. geology or physics, are based on shared assumptions - a paradigm.
The paradigm tells scientists about the nature of reality, what questions to answer, what is acceptable as evidence, etc. A scientist who challenges this paradigm may be ridiculed and even shunned by the scientific community. This is what makes science, argues Kuhn, in reality a closed system.
How do different sociological perspectives see science as a belief system? You can find the answer below.
Robert K. Merton (1973), a functionalist, claims that science only works when supported by other institutions and values, including religious ones. He defines four leading norms that guide scientists in their research under the acronym CUDOS:
Communism: scientific knowledge is the property of the people. Scientists must share their findings with other scientists so that science can evolve.
Universalism: the validity and reliability of scientific knowledge is judged by universal, objective criteria.
Disinterestedness: scientific knowledge must be pursued for its own sake.
Organised scepticism: all scientific findings are open to criticism and challenge.
Interpretive sociologists argue that all knowledge, including science, is socially constructed. They argue that rather than being objective truth, scientific facts are produced within a paradigm that tells practitioners what they should expect to see and what instruments they ought to use.
Both Marxist and feminist theorists are critical of science as a belief system. They view science as serving the interests of dominant groups and view scientific developments as being driven by the need for certain types of knowledge.
Modernist Anthony Giddens argues that science is becoming more and more significant in people's lives, but this is not because of the decline of religion. It is due to the decrease in traditionalism.
Theorists who follow the postmodernist tradition, such as Jean-Francois Lyotard (1984), argue that science is based on meta-narratives, which they - in general - reject. They claim that through the meta-narratives and the concept of absolute truth, science also plays a role in the domination and manipulation of the people, just like religion.
Protestant theologist and sociologist Peter L. Berger believes that even though religion's importance has fallen in many areas, science will not take its place. He argues that people need to rediscover the supernatural in everyday experiences, allowing religion to remain the dominant belief system in society.
Fig. 2 - There are differing perspectives on science and religion separately and as compatible belief systems.
Sign up for free to gain access to all our flashcards.
Do science and religion go hand in hand?
Some sociologists see a clear conflict between science and religion, while others argue for a more compatible relationship between science and religious belief.
Can science and religion coexist in secularism?
Many sociologists argue that the relationship between science and religion is complex and cannot be described simply by stating that they stand in opposition to each other. There have been developments and changes in both areas that made them seem more compatible than before.
What's the difference between science and religion?
Karl Popper argues that science is an open belief system based on empirical data collection, continuous criticism and value freedom. Traditional religions are usually closed belief systems with absolute truth based on God's words, recorded in ancient texts, rather than on experiments and questioning.
Where do science and religion meet?
Stephen Jay Gould argues that science and religion deal with different areas of life, which do not overlap or meet. Science is set out to define the evolution and the laws of nature. Religion is there to define the meaning of life and provide moral guidance and psychological relief.
Why is religion important in science?
Functionalists thought that religion provides scientists with norms to guide them in their scientific research. They believed that this was the only way that science could work, with the support of religion (and other institutions).
At StudySmarter, we have created a learning platform that serves millions of students. Meet the people who work hard to deliver fact based content as well as making sure it is verified.
Lily Hulatt is a Digital Content Specialist with over three years of experience in content strategy and curriculum design. She gained her PhD in English Literature from Durham University in 2022, taught in Durham University’s English Studies Department, and has contributed to a number of publications. Lily specialises in English Literature, English Language, History, and Philosophy.
Get to know Lily
Gabriel Freitas is an AI Engineer with a solid experience in software development, machine learning algorithms, and generative AI, including large language models’ (LLMs) applications. Graduated in Electrical Engineering at the University of São Paulo, he is currently pursuing an MSc in Computer Engineering at the University of Campinas, specializing in machine learning topics. Gabriel has a strong background in software engineering and has worked on projects involving computer vision, embedded AI, and LLM applications.
Get to know Gabriel
Explanations 
Flashcards 
StudySmarter AI 
Notes 
Study Plans 
Study Sets 
Exams 
Find a job 
Student Deals 
Magazine 
Mobile App 