Social Stratification

Social stratification in sociology

There are many dimensions to social stratification. We will first clarify what we mean by "social stratification". Then, we will summarise:

• Sociological views on social stratification
• Different forms of social stratification
• Social stratification and class
• Social mobility
• Wealth distribution in the UK
• Poverty
• The welfare state
• Power relationships

Social stratification: meaning

Imagine a pyramid that represents society. The most powerful social groups are at the top of the pyramid, while the least powerful are at the bottom.

Stratification is based on several factors, including income, wealth, social status and power. It can have wide-ranging impacts on all aspects of a person's life - their access to wealth and resources, education, career, life chances, etc. Let's see what the different branches of sociology have to say about social stratification.

Stratification involves social hierarchies.

Sociological views of social stratification

Let's study views of social stratification from three primary sociological approaches.

The functionalist view of social stratification

Functionalist sociologists such as Davis and Moore (1945) believe that social stratification not only occurs in every society but is necessary to its functioning. Some essential positions in society require higher levels of skill, talent, and sacrifice and therefore come with high incomes and more social status than "less important" social roles.

Therefore, functionalists argue that some social inequality is inevitable because people will always be treated differently according to their merits and what they contribute to society.

The Marxist view of social stratification

Karl Marx and subsequent Marxists suggest that, rather than being functional, social stratification is based on class exploitation. It results from the bourgeoisie (the ruling class) accumulating wealth and economic power at the expense of the proletariat (the working class) and is not inevitable or necessary.

The Weberian view of social stratification

Unlike Marx, Max Weber argued that social stratification is based not only on class but also on social status and political power. This meant that people's status and level of political influence could differ from their class/economic position and they could face inequality and stratification in multiple areas of society.

Forms of social stratification

In modern times, several forms of stratification are recognised based on factors other than those highlighted above. Let's look at social stratification based on gender, ethnicity and age.

Stratification by gender

Sociologists believe that gender socialisation - bringing up and treating girls and boys differently - is the main way people learn to "do" gender, rather than due to innate biological differences.

Feminist sociologists argue that society is patriarchal - it is structured to benefit men at the expense of women because men tend to have more economic, political and social power. Despite considerable advances, gender inequality can be still be observed in many areas of society:

• Gender-segregated "feminine" and "masculine" industries (such as nursing and engineering respectively)
• Women are paid less than men - the gender pay gap
• Women have lower chances of promotion and advancement
• Women do most domestic work/childcare

Stratification by ethnicity

Modern Western societies are characterised by multiculturalism and filled with people of many different ethnic backgrounds. This can also be a site of social stratification, with ethnic minority groups facing unequal positions in the social hierarchy, especially if class, gender, disability, sexuality etc. are factored in.

Sociologists recognise and study racism, stratification and prejudice based on ethnicity faced by ethnic minorities in several fields, such as:

• High levels of unemployment and underemployment
• Reduced chances of getting high paid positions and being promoted
• Underrepresentation in all levels of politics
• Being unfairly targeted by law enforcement

Stratification by age

Age can be understood as both a biological and chronological category (e.g. "I am 15 years old") and a social category (e.g. "I am a teenager/young person"). Sociologists are interested in age as a social category and how various ages are perceived.

People face different challenges at different ages throughout their lives, which can be exacerbated by factors such as class, gender, ethnicity, sexuality, disability, etc. Let's take a look at the experiences of young and elderly people.

Youth

Teenagers and young adults alike can face stratification and inequality in several ways.

• Young people may be unable to live independently and have to depend on their parents/live at home.
• They may suffer high levels of unemployment due to personal and economic uncertainty.
• Also, they may be unable to access higher education and well-paying jobs based on their income or social class.

Old age

We may think of older people as experienced and secure, but they can also face age discrimination and inequality.

• For example, getting older is viewed negatively in the UK and is considered something to be avoided.
• Older people can be disregarded for certain jobs and roles (although this is now illegal).
• Some older people also don't have substantial pensions saved up and so struggle to get by once they retire.

Social stratification: caste and class

One of the primary ways people face stratification in society, regardless of other circumstances, is through their social class background.

Measuring social class

Social class is often based on occupation because an individual's occupation is usually closely linked to their income, social status and life chances.

Originally, social class in the UK was recorded and measured through the Registrar General's Social Class (RGSC) scale. However, this was then replaced by the National Statistics Socio-economic Scale (NS-SEC) due to problems with the RGSC, such as disregarding unemployed people and married women.

Life chances

An important aspect of social stratification is its impact on life chances.

Life chances are impacted greatly by social class because upper and middle-class people have better access to many institutions/services that improve quality of life, e.g. good healthcare, than working-class people.

Social class inequality can impact people's life chances.

Studies of social class

There are two prominent studies on social class undertaken on the theory that the working class is becoming more "middle-class" in culture and norms. Let's examine them.

Goldthorpe

John H. Goldthorpe conducted the "affluent worker" study in Luton in the 1960s, interviewing well-paid car plant workers to understand if their newfound wealth affected their values and behaviours. He found that they were not, in fact, becoming more "bourgeois" but argued that they made up a "new", self-interested working class.

Devine

Fiona Devine conducted research on Luton workers in 1992, following up on Goldthorpe's study. She discovered that working-class values and lifestyles hadn't actually changed as much as Goldthorpe suggested.

Significance of social class

There are many ongoing debates about whether social class is as significant in people's lives as it used to be. Some believe that class identity has declined, while others argue that class is still incredibly important in shaping lives and experiences.

Social mobility and stratification

The level of social mobility in society is important to keep track of. High levels of mobility - lots of people changing their social status - can reveal if the society in question is meritocratic, for example.

Upward social mobility can technically be achieved through routes such as high educational attainment, marrying into a well-off family, etc. However, working-class people in the UK have lower chances of moving up the social ladder as they may lack the privileges and connections of the middle class.

Difference between social stratification and social mobility

Social mobility should not be confused with social stratification. Social stratification refers to the hierarchising of different social classes, and social mobility is when people move between these classes.

Wealth distribution and social stratification in the UK

A person's income refers to a flow of money that they receive through work, investments, or benefits. They may also have wealth - assets that are of value, such as property, land and shares. Income and wealth are both distributed very unevenly in the UK.

However, wealth is distributed even more unequally - the wealthiest 10% of British households owned almost half of all wealth between 2012-14.

Sociologists argue that this is exacerbated due to the emergence of a new "overclass" of ultra-rich and powerful individuals, e.g. millionaire CEOs, who hoard wealth and exploit the poor.

Poverty and social stratification

Poverty can be defined in several ways, the most prominent of which are as follows.

1. Absolute poverty is when people cannot afford to meet their basic needs on their income level.
2. Relative poverty is when basic needs are met, but people cannot afford the average standard of living in their society.

In the UK, relative poverty is more common than absolute poverty. Certain social groups, such as older people, those with disabilities, some ethnic minorities and lone-parent families, are more at risk of poverty.

Sociological examinations of poverty

Sociologists have looked at poverty through two lenses: a culture of poverty and a cycle of deprivation. The first angle views poverty as an individual failure, the result of absorbing values and subcultures that encourage staying in poverty.

The second suggests that poverty is cyclical and passed down through generations, making it very difficult to break out of.

Sociological explanations of poverty

There are a number of explanations, sociological and otherwise, of how poverty arises and is maintained.

Functionalism

Functionalists believe that poverty serves a positive function for some groups in industrial society as poor people are easy to exploit, do the "undesirable" jobs and represent social evils e.g. "laziness".

Marxism

The Marxist approach argues that poverty is an outcome of capitalism, which creates and thrives off class inequalities by enriching the ruling class at the expense of the working class.

Feminism

Feminists highlight that women are more likely to experience poverty than men for a range of reasons, including the gender pay gap, unequal divisions of labour and absorbing the worst effects of deprivation to protect their families.

New Right

The New Right believes that an overly generous welfare state creates welfare dependency and an "underclass" of people who remain in poverty because they would rather live off benefits than work.

Other approaches

Alternative explanations for poverty are the effects of unemployment, an inadequate welfare system, economic insecurity and globalisation.

Sociologists have different views on poverty.

The welfare state and social stratification

We've mentioned the welfare state as a potential cause of poverty. But what is the welfare state?

Power and social stratification

A very important dimension of social stratification and inequality is power.

Weber, power and authority

Max Weber theorised that power comes from either coercion (forcing someone to do something) or authority (when one person willingly obeys another).

Weber identified three forms of authority:

• Traditional: Based on traditions and customs
• Rational/legal: Based on laws and rules
• Charismatic: Based on an influential leader/figure

Other sociological views on power

Marxists believe that power is based on unequal and exploitative class relationships, where the bourgeoisie exerts power over the working class.

On the other hand, feminists such as Sylvia Walby (1990) argue that power is patriarchal and is used by men to subjugate and exploit women.

Power and politics

The government is possibly the most direct source of power in society.

People have differing views on the role of the state and how it exercises its power. Pluralists, for example, argue that power is divided between many different groups and interests. However, Marxists and conflict theorists assert that power is concentrated in the hands of a privileged few.